为糖尿病足溃疡干预措施评估研究制定核心结果集。

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1112
Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A Lavery, Joseph L Mills, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J G Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K Wukich, Robert J Hinchliffe
{"title":"为糖尿病足溃疡干预措施评估研究制定核心结果集。","authors":"Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A Lavery, Joseph L Mills, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J G Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K Wukich, Robert J Hinchliffe","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1958-1968"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A Lavery, Joseph L Mills, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J G Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K Wukich, Robert J Hinchliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-1112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1958-1968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全球有 5.37 亿人患有糖尿病,其中 34% 的人在一生中会出现足部溃疡。与糖尿病相关的足部溃疡给全球医疗系统造成了巨大压力,因此有必要提供高质量的证据来指导患者的治疗。鉴于报告结果的异质性,我们开发了一套核心结果集(COS),以规范糖尿病相关足部溃疡治疗方法评估研究的结果测量:研究设计与方法:COS 是采用疗效试验中的核心结果测量(COMET)方法制定的。在第一轮德尔菲调查中,患者和专家使用九点李克特量表(从1[不重要]到9[关键])对这些结果进行评分。根据预先确定的标准,未达成共识的结果将在第二轮德尔菲调查中重新排序。两轮德尔菲调查后,关键结果和未达成共识的结果在共识会议上进行讨论,并在会上批准了 COS:结果:系统回顾和患者访谈产生了 103 项候选结果。分别有 336 名和 176 名受访者完成了连续两轮德尔菲调查,第二轮总回复率为 52%。在共识会议讨论的 37 项结果中(22 项关键结果和 15 项第二轮后未达成共识的结果),有 8 项形成了 COS:伤口愈合、愈合时间、新发/复发溃疡、感染、大截肢、小截肢、与健康相关的生活质量和死亡率:针对糖尿病足溃疡治疗方法评估研究提出的 COS 是采用 COMET 方法制定的。研究界采用该方法将有助于评估当前和不断发展的干预措施的比较效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.

Objective: Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.

Research design and methods: The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.

Results: The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.

Conclusions: The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arterial Stiffness Is Related to Diabetes-Associated Microvascular Complications: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance. Flying With Type 1 Diabetes as Commercial Airline Pilots in the U.S.: The Sky Is the Limit for People With Type 1 Diabetes. Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry. Longitudinal Determination of Diabetes Complications and Other Clinical Variables as Risk Factors for Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1