{"title":"吸入式抗生素对呼吸机相关肺炎的预防作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 21 January 2024. Randomized controlled trials investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven randomized controlled trials, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74–1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 d; 95% CI, −0.91 to 1.1), and hospital (MD, 0.30 d; 95% CI, −1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation duration (MD, 0.45 d; 95% CI, −0.45 to 1.35) between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and mechanical ventilation duration was not statistically significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The preventive effect of inhaled antibiotic against ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 21 January 2024. Randomized controlled trials investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven randomized controlled trials, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74–1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 d; 95% CI, −0.91 to 1.1), and hospital (MD, 0.30 d; 95% CI, −1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation duration (MD, 0.45 d; 95% CI, −0.45 to 1.35) between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and mechanical ventilation duration was not statistically significant.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002401\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The preventive effect of inhaled antibiotic against ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) constitutes a considerable challenge for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and necessitates the development of effective preventive strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for preventing VAP.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 21 January 2024. Randomized controlled trials investigating the clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics for VAP prevention were included.
Results
Seven randomized controlled trials, involving 1465 patients, of whom 734 were classified as the study group receiving inhaled antibiotics and 731 as the control group receiving placebo were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the occurrence of VAP was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.92). However, there were no significant differences in mortality (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74–1.09), length of stay in ICU (mean difference [MD], 0.10 d; 95% CI, −0.91 to 1.1), and hospital (MD, 0.30 d; 95% CI, −1.82 to 2.43), and mechanical ventilation duration (MD, 0.45 d; 95% CI, −0.45 to 1.35) between groups.
Conclusions
Inhaled antibiotics hold promise for mitigating the risk of VAP among critically ill patients. However, their impact on mortality, length of stay in ICU and hospital, and mechanical ventilation duration was not statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.