全髋关节置换术中骨密度变化的长期随访:多孔钛结构外壳与多孔涂层外壳随机对照试验的比较分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06289-z
Michael Axenhus, Mats Salemyr, Sebastian Mukka, Martin Magnéli, Olof Sköldenberg
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中骨密度变化的长期随访:多孔钛结构外壳与多孔涂层外壳随机对照试验的比较分析。","authors":"Michael Axenhus, Mats Salemyr, Sebastian Mukka, Martin Magnéli, Olof Sköldenberg","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06289-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periacetabular bone loss poses a considerable challenge in the longevity and stability of acetabular implants used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Innovations in implant design, specifically the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) porous titanium constructs, might reduce bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to build upon our previous randomized controlled trial, which found no change in periacetabular bone loss between a 3D porous none-hydroxyapatite coated titanium cup and a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated cup over a two year follow-up period by extending the follow-up duration to ten years post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, long-term follow-up study conducted over a ten year period in patients who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing a 3D porous titanium construct shell (PTC group) with a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated titanium shell (PC-group). The primary outcome measured was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) within four specific periacetabular zones, alongside overall bone loss, which was assessed through BMD in the lumbar spine at two, six and ten years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 in the PTC and 20 in the PC group were analysed for the primary endpoint up to ten years. The mean bone mineral density in zones 1-4 was 3.7% higher in the PTC group than in the PC group at six years postoperatively and 12.0% higher at ten years. Clinical outcomes, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTC group displayed superior long-term bone preservation compared to the PC group while maintaining similar clinical outcomes up to ten years postoperatively. Although with a small sample size, our findings suggest that porous titanium cups have the potential to minimize BMD loss around the cup which could contribute to improving THA outcomes and implant durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term follow-up of bone density changes in total hip arthroplasty: comparative analysis from a randomized controlled trial of a porous titanium construct shell vs. a porous coated shell.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Axenhus, Mats Salemyr, Sebastian Mukka, Martin Magnéli, Olof Sköldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06289-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periacetabular bone loss poses a considerable challenge in the longevity and stability of acetabular implants used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Innovations in implant design, specifically the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) porous titanium constructs, might reduce bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to build upon our previous randomized controlled trial, which found no change in periacetabular bone loss between a 3D porous none-hydroxyapatite coated titanium cup and a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated cup over a two year follow-up period by extending the follow-up duration to ten years post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, long-term follow-up study conducted over a ten year period in patients who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing a 3D porous titanium construct shell (PTC group) with a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated titanium shell (PC-group). The primary outcome measured was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) within four specific periacetabular zones, alongside overall bone loss, which was assessed through BMD in the lumbar spine at two, six and ten years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 in the PTC and 20 in the PC group were analysed for the primary endpoint up to ten years. The mean bone mineral density in zones 1-4 was 3.7% higher in the PTC group than in the PC group at six years postoperatively and 12.0% higher at ten years. Clinical outcomes, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PTC group displayed superior long-term bone preservation compared to the PC group while maintaining similar clinical outcomes up to ten years postoperatively. Although with a small sample size, our findings suggest that porous titanium cups have the potential to minimize BMD loss around the cup which could contribute to improving THA outcomes and implant durability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06289-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06289-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髋臼周围骨质流失对全髋关节置换术(THA)中使用的髋臼植入物的寿命和稳定性构成了相当大的挑战。植入物设计的创新,特别是三维(3D)多孔钛结构的引入,可能会减少骨吸收。我们之前的随机对照试验发现,三维多孔非羟基磷灰石涂层钛髋臼杯和标准多孔羟基磷灰石涂层髋臼杯在两年的随访期内髋臼周围骨质流失没有变化,本研究的目的就是在此基础上,将随访时间延长至术后十年:这是一项为期十年的单中心长期随访研究,研究对象是曾参加过三维多孔钛构造外壳(PTC组)与标准多孔羟基磷灰石涂层钛外壳(PC组)比较随机对照试验的患者。测量的主要结果是四个特定髋臼周围区域内骨矿物质密度(BMD)的变化,以及总体骨质流失情况,后者通过术后两年、六年和十年的腰椎骨矿物质密度进行评估。次要结果包括临床结果测量:共对 PTC 组中的 18 人和 PC 组中的 20 人进行了长达 10 年的主要终点分析。术后六年时,PTC 组 1-4 区的平均骨矿密度比 PC 组高 3.7%,十年时高 12.0%。两组的临床结果和不良事件发生频率没有差异:结论:与 PC 组相比,PTC 组的长期骨保存效果更佳,同时术后十年的临床疗效与 PC 组相似。虽然样本量较小,但我们的研究结果表明,多孔钛杯有可能最大限度地减少钛杯周围的 BMD 损失,从而有助于改善 THA 的疗效和植入物的耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term follow-up of bone density changes in total hip arthroplasty: comparative analysis from a randomized controlled trial of a porous titanium construct shell vs. a porous coated shell.

Purpose: Periacetabular bone loss poses a considerable challenge in the longevity and stability of acetabular implants used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Innovations in implant design, specifically the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) porous titanium constructs, might reduce bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to build upon our previous randomized controlled trial, which found no change in periacetabular bone loss between a 3D porous none-hydroxyapatite coated titanium cup and a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated cup over a two year follow-up period by extending the follow-up duration to ten years post-surgery.

Methods: This was a single-centre, long-term follow-up study conducted over a ten year period in patients who had previously participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing a 3D porous titanium construct shell (PTC group) with a standard porous hydroxyapatite coated titanium shell (PC-group). The primary outcome measured was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) within four specific periacetabular zones, alongside overall bone loss, which was assessed through BMD in the lumbar spine at two, six and ten years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcome measures.

Results: In total, 18 in the PTC and 20 in the PC group were analysed for the primary endpoint up to ten years. The mean bone mineral density in zones 1-4 was 3.7% higher in the PTC group than in the PC group at six years postoperatively and 12.0% higher at ten years. Clinical outcomes, and the frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: The PTC group displayed superior long-term bone preservation compared to the PC group while maintaining similar clinical outcomes up to ten years postoperatively. Although with a small sample size, our findings suggest that porous titanium cups have the potential to minimize BMD loss around the cup which could contribute to improving THA outcomes and implant durability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1