Carissa van den Berk-Clark , Emily Duncan , Ian Galbreath , Andrew Marino , Elizabeth A. Baker
{"title":"将社会资本与提供药物治疗的政治经济联系起来：伊利诺伊州以康复为导向的护理系统案例。","authors":"Carissa van den Berk-Clark , Emily Duncan , Ian Galbreath , Andrew Marino , Elizabeth A. Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking social capital and the political economy of substance treatment delivery: The case of recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois\",\"authors\":\"Carissa van den Berk-Clark , Emily Duncan , Ian Galbreath , Andrew Marino , Elizabeth A. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002457\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Linking social capital and the political economy of substance treatment delivery: The case of recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois
Background
Recovery-oriented systems of care have been a widely supported approach to transforming existing substance treatment programs across different states through developing recovery programs and interagency networks. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers influencing their development and implementation.
Methods
Qualitative study of 5 different recovery-oriented systems of care in Illinois. Nineteen respondents completed individual interviews.
Results
A total of 124 codes and 2 themes were identified, reflecting constraints and opportunities. Theme 1 focused on how ROSC programs developed bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Theme 2 focused on the ROSC coordinator and lead agency's power and accountability.
Conclusions
The roles of lead agencies and ROSC coordinators were highlighted in the development and implementation of ROSCs. ROSC membership structures allow for bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Still, additional technical support is needed to improve accountability, reduce power differentials and turf battles, and ensure greater participation among more diverse stakeholders.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
