社论评论:肩部手术专家无法一致识别人工智能生成的科学摘要。

Mikalyn T DeFoor, Andrew J Sheean
{"title":"社论评论:肩部手术专家无法一致识别人工智能生成的科学摘要。","authors":"Mikalyn T DeFoor, Andrew J Sheean","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been exponential growth in the number of artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-related publications in recent years. For example, in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery, there was a 6-fold increase in the number of publications between 2018 and 2021. AI shows the potential to improve diagnostic precision, generate precise surgical templates, direct personalized treatment plans, and reduce administrative costs. However, although AI and ML technology has the ability to positively impact biomedical research, it should be closely monitored and used with extreme caution in the realm of research and scientific writing. Current large language models raise concerns regarding the veracity of AI-generated content, copyright and ownership infringement, fabricated references, lack of in-text citations, plagiarism, and questions of authorship. Recent research has shown that even the most experienced surgeons are unable to consistently detect AI-generated scientific writing. Of note, AI detection software is more adept in this role. AI should be used with caution in the development and production of scholarly work.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Commentary: Experts in Shoulder Surgery Do Not Consistently Detect Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Abstracts.\",\"authors\":\"Mikalyn T DeFoor, Andrew J Sheean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There has been exponential growth in the number of artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-related publications in recent years. For example, in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery, there was a 6-fold increase in the number of publications between 2018 and 2021. AI shows the potential to improve diagnostic precision, generate precise surgical templates, direct personalized treatment plans, and reduce administrative costs. However, although AI and ML technology has the ability to positively impact biomedical research, it should be closely monitored and used with extreme caution in the realm of research and scientific writing. Current large language models raise concerns regarding the veracity of AI-generated content, copyright and ownership infringement, fabricated references, lack of in-text citations, plagiarism, and questions of authorship. Recent research has shown that even the most experienced surgeons are unable to consistently detect AI-generated scientific writing. Of note, AI detection software is more adept in this role. AI should be used with caution in the development and production of scholarly work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.038\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)相关出版物的数量呈指数级增长。例如,在肩肘外科领域,2018 年至 2021 年间发表的论文数量增长了 6 倍。人工智能在提高诊断精确度、生成精确的手术模板、指导个性化治疗方案和降低管理成本方面显示出潜力。不过,虽然人工智能和 ML 技术有能力对生物医学研究产生积极影响,但在研究和科学写作领域,应密切关注并极为谨慎地使用。令人担忧的是,目前的大型语言模型会引发人工智能生成内容的真实性、版权和所有权侵权、编造参考文献、缺乏文中引用、剽窃和作者身份等问题。最近的研究表明,即使是最有经验的外科医生也无法始终如一地检测人工智能生成的科学写作。值得注意的是,人工智能检测软件在这方面更为擅长。在学术著作的开发和制作过程中,应谨慎使用人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial Commentary: Experts in Shoulder Surgery Do Not Consistently Detect Artificial Intelligence-Generated Scientific Abstracts.

There has been exponential growth in the number of artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-related publications in recent years. For example, in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery, there was a 6-fold increase in the number of publications between 2018 and 2021. AI shows the potential to improve diagnostic precision, generate precise surgical templates, direct personalized treatment plans, and reduce administrative costs. However, although AI and ML technology has the ability to positively impact biomedical research, it should be closely monitored and used with extreme caution in the realm of research and scientific writing. Current large language models raise concerns regarding the veracity of AI-generated content, copyright and ownership infringement, fabricated references, lack of in-text citations, plagiarism, and questions of authorship. Recent research has shown that even the most experienced surgeons are unable to consistently detect AI-generated scientific writing. Of note, AI detection software is more adept in this role. AI should be used with caution in the development and production of scholarly work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply to Editorial Comment "Autologous Minced Repair of Knee Cartilage Is Safely and Effectively Performed Using Arthroscopic Techniques". Culture Expansion Alters Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Production of Osteoarthritis-relevant Cytokines and Growth Factors. Steeper Slope of the Medial Tibial Plateau, Greater Varus Alignment, and Narrower Intercondylar Distance and Notch Width Increase Risk for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review. Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively. The Knee Anterolateral Ligament is Present in 82% of North American and 65% of European But Only in 46% of Asian Studies: A Systematic Review of Frequency and Anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1