"你也应该得到暴民的正义":非洲社交媒体上暴民(不)正义的话语理由

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Journal of Law Crime and Justice Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100697
Maame Efua Addadzi - Koom
{"title":"\"你也应该得到暴民的正义\":非洲社交媒体上暴民(不)正义的话语理由","authors":"Maame Efua Addadzi - Koom","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores how social media discourses justify mob justice to fuel its perpetration in Africa. It asks, <em>what discursive strategies and patterns rationalise mob justice in social media discussions?</em> It relies on 319 mob-justice-related tweets between 2018 and 2022 across seven African countries to identify five main discursive strategies: normative discourses, exception discourses, discourses of slow or failed criminal justice system, culture of violence discourses and banter discourses. The findings contribute to our understanding of the form mob justice discourses take on social media to incite traditional mob justice on the continent. It recommends appropriate state-centred legal responses to inciting mob justice on social media while respecting citizens’ freedom of expression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“You deserve mob justice too”: Discursive justifications of mob (In)Justice on social media in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Maame Efua Addadzi - Koom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper explores how social media discourses justify mob justice to fuel its perpetration in Africa. It asks, <em>what discursive strategies and patterns rationalise mob justice in social media discussions?</em> It relies on 319 mob-justice-related tweets between 2018 and 2022 across seven African countries to identify five main discursive strategies: normative discourses, exception discourses, discourses of slow or failed criminal justice system, culture of violence discourses and banter discourses. The findings contribute to our understanding of the form mob justice discourses take on social media to incite traditional mob justice on the continent. It recommends appropriate state-centred legal responses to inciting mob justice on social media while respecting citizens’ freedom of expression.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061624000491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061624000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了社交媒体话语如何为暴民正义辩护,从而助长其在非洲的实施。本文提出的问题是:在社交媒体讨论中,哪些话语策略和模式使暴民正义合理化?本文依据2018年至2022年间七个非洲国家319条与暴民司法相关的推文,确定了五种主要的话语策略:规范性话语、例外话语、刑事司法系统缓慢或失败的话语、暴力文化话语和戏谑话语。研究结果有助于我们了解暴民司法话语在社交媒体上煽动非洲大陆传统暴民司法的形式。研究建议在尊重公民言论自由的同时,针对在社交媒体上煽动暴民司法的行为采取以国家为中心的适当法律应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“You deserve mob justice too”: Discursive justifications of mob (In)Justice on social media in Africa

This paper explores how social media discourses justify mob justice to fuel its perpetration in Africa. It asks, what discursive strategies and patterns rationalise mob justice in social media discussions? It relies on 319 mob-justice-related tweets between 2018 and 2022 across seven African countries to identify five main discursive strategies: normative discourses, exception discourses, discourses of slow or failed criminal justice system, culture of violence discourses and banter discourses. The findings contribute to our understanding of the form mob justice discourses take on social media to incite traditional mob justice on the continent. It recommends appropriate state-centred legal responses to inciting mob justice on social media while respecting citizens’ freedom of expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to: ‘Male Rape Myths: Examining the role of Victim Empathy and Socio-demographics in a cross-sectional sample of UK Adults’ [Int. J. Law, Crime and Justice, 76, 100645] On the decision-making framework for policing: A proposal for improving police decision-making Does performance appraisal fairness alleviate police officers’ organizational silence? -Considering the moderating effect of trust- Criminal justice response in Cape Verde: Understanding punishment severity in case of gender-based violence against women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1