在理论与实践之间定位 TPACK XK:反思性实践、应用伦理和技术怀疑态度

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100204
Marie K. Heath , Stephanie Moore
{"title":"在理论与实践之间定位 TPACK XK:反思性实践、应用伦理和技术怀疑态度","authors":"Marie K. Heath ,&nbsp;Stephanie Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The problem of context, contextualization, and XK has stalked TPACK since its inception. We suggest that efforts in education technology to deepen the theory and scholarship around this domain of knowing have run up against the field's tendency toward discrete interpretations of TPACK, its continued reluctance to explore socio-cultural influences on education and technology, and the inherent tensions between abstracted theoretical models and the realities of practice they represent. Additionally, context raises important ethical considerations that are deeply embedded in educational technology selection and use. In an attempt to reject the binary of theory and practice and also extend the relationships between contextual and ethical knowledge in TPACK, we propose ways the field can extend both research and practice related to XK through reflective practice, professional ethics, and technoskeptical dispositions. Using examples from classroom practices, we have developed reflective and critical questions to elicit connections between TPACK, XK, and ethics which include hyper-local and narrow contexts as well as broader socio-cultural contexts. Intersecting ethics with TPACK helps educators situate the profession of education within society; consider the broad social implications of technology, pedagogy, and content separately and as TPACK; and work toward commitments for learning and social justice through the actions of the good enough.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000442/pdfft?md5=1cc284844bbb100f1dccdef64258f50a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000442-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locating TPACK XK between theory and practice: Reflective practice, applied ethics, and technoskeptical dispositions\",\"authors\":\"Marie K. Heath ,&nbsp;Stephanie Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The problem of context, contextualization, and XK has stalked TPACK since its inception. We suggest that efforts in education technology to deepen the theory and scholarship around this domain of knowing have run up against the field's tendency toward discrete interpretations of TPACK, its continued reluctance to explore socio-cultural influences on education and technology, and the inherent tensions between abstracted theoretical models and the realities of practice they represent. Additionally, context raises important ethical considerations that are deeply embedded in educational technology selection and use. In an attempt to reject the binary of theory and practice and also extend the relationships between contextual and ethical knowledge in TPACK, we propose ways the field can extend both research and practice related to XK through reflective practice, professional ethics, and technoskeptical dispositions. Using examples from classroom practices, we have developed reflective and critical questions to elicit connections between TPACK, XK, and ethics which include hyper-local and narrow contexts as well as broader socio-cultural contexts. Intersecting ethics with TPACK helps educators situate the profession of education within society; consider the broad social implications of technology, pedagogy, and content separately and as TPACK; and work toward commitments for learning and social justice through the actions of the good enough.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000442/pdfft?md5=1cc284844bbb100f1dccdef64258f50a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000442-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自TPACK诞生以来,情境、情境化和XK问题一直困扰着TPACK。我们认为,在教育技术领域,围绕这一知识领域深化理论和学术研究的努力遇到了以下问题:该领域倾向于对 TPACK 进行离散的解释,始终不愿探讨社会文化对教育和技术的影响,抽象的理论模型与它们所代表的实践现实之间存在固有的紧张关系。此外,情境还提出了深植于教育技术选择和使用中的重要伦理问题。为了摒弃理论与实践的二元对立,同时拓展 TPACK 中情境知识与伦理知识之间的关系,我们提出了本领域可以通过反思性实践、职业道德和技术怀疑态度来拓展与 XK 相关的研究与实践的方法。利用课堂实践中的实例,我们提出了反思性和批判性的问题,以引出 TPACK、XK 和伦理之间的联系,其中包括超本地和狭隘的背景以及更广泛的社会文化背景。将伦理与 TPACK 相结合,有助于教育工作者将教育职业置于社会之中;考虑技术、教学法和内容分别以及作为 TPACK 的广泛社会影响;并通过足够好的行动,努力实现对学习和社会正义的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Locating TPACK XK between theory and practice: Reflective practice, applied ethics, and technoskeptical dispositions

The problem of context, contextualization, and XK has stalked TPACK since its inception. We suggest that efforts in education technology to deepen the theory and scholarship around this domain of knowing have run up against the field's tendency toward discrete interpretations of TPACK, its continued reluctance to explore socio-cultural influences on education and technology, and the inherent tensions between abstracted theoretical models and the realities of practice they represent. Additionally, context raises important ethical considerations that are deeply embedded in educational technology selection and use. In an attempt to reject the binary of theory and practice and also extend the relationships between contextual and ethical knowledge in TPACK, we propose ways the field can extend both research and practice related to XK through reflective practice, professional ethics, and technoskeptical dispositions. Using examples from classroom practices, we have developed reflective and critical questions to elicit connections between TPACK, XK, and ethics which include hyper-local and narrow contexts as well as broader socio-cultural contexts. Intersecting ethics with TPACK helps educators situate the profession of education within society; consider the broad social implications of technology, pedagogy, and content separately and as TPACK; and work toward commitments for learning and social justice through the actions of the good enough.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1