有胰岛素和无胰岛素患者中未受控制的高血糖(2 型糖尿病)与心血管后遗症之间的关系

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102168
Sultan Alghadeer , Abdullah M. Mubarak , Bashayr Alsuwayni , Faisal Almurdhi , Hazim Almalki , Metib Alotaibi
{"title":"有胰岛素和无胰岛素患者中未受控制的高血糖(2 型糖尿病)与心血管后遗症之间的关系","authors":"Sultan Alghadeer ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Mubarak ,&nbsp;Bashayr Alsuwayni ,&nbsp;Faisal Almurdhi ,&nbsp;Hazim Almalki ,&nbsp;Metib Alotaibi","doi":"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the availability of new cardio-protective oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin is often recommended as an add-on therapy for type-2 diabetes with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) ≥ 9. Introducing insulin as a choice for patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia (HbA1C≥9) has been questionably associated with cardiovascular sequelae. This study aims to examine the association between insulin use and cardiovascular effects in type-2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to identify cardiovascular complications between the two groups (patients with HbA1C≥9% on insulin versus those with HbA1C≥9% without insulin) at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). Patients with type-2 diabetes whose HbA1C was ≥ 9 during the period from 2015 to 2018 and who were followed up within the hospital for at least 5 years until the end of 2022 were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 366 patients were included in the study; 286 patients were on insulin, while 80 patients were not. The median baseline HbA1C levels were comparable between the two groups (10.2 versus 9.8). After 5 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups (29.4 % of insulin users versus 18.8 % of non-insulin users; p = 0.065). However, the incidence of other diabetes complications, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, was significantly higher among patients who were on insulin compared to those not on insulin (50.7 % versus 27.5 %; p = 0.005). Additionally, the average of the last three HbA1C readings and the overall average HbA1C readings were significantly higher among patients who were on insulin (9.67 % versus 9.07 %; p = 0.001) compared to those not on insulin (9.64 % versus 9.11 %; p = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study did not find a significant association between the use of insulin and cardiovascular complications. The association between insulin therapy and the development of other diabetes complications warrants further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"32 10","pages":"Article 102168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002184/pdfft?md5=009719cf703073428eebbac1c5c4b243&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424002184-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between uncontrolled hyperglycemia (Type-2 Diabetes) and cardiovascular sequelae in patients with and without insulin\",\"authors\":\"Sultan Alghadeer ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Mubarak ,&nbsp;Bashayr Alsuwayni ,&nbsp;Faisal Almurdhi ,&nbsp;Hazim Almalki ,&nbsp;Metib Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the availability of new cardio-protective oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin is often recommended as an add-on therapy for type-2 diabetes with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) ≥ 9. Introducing insulin as a choice for patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia (HbA1C≥9) has been questionably associated with cardiovascular sequelae. This study aims to examine the association between insulin use and cardiovascular effects in type-2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to identify cardiovascular complications between the two groups (patients with HbA1C≥9% on insulin versus those with HbA1C≥9% without insulin) at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). Patients with type-2 diabetes whose HbA1C was ≥ 9 during the period from 2015 to 2018 and who were followed up within the hospital for at least 5 years until the end of 2022 were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 366 patients were included in the study; 286 patients were on insulin, while 80 patients were not. The median baseline HbA1C levels were comparable between the two groups (10.2 versus 9.8). After 5 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups (29.4 % of insulin users versus 18.8 % of non-insulin users; p = 0.065). However, the incidence of other diabetes complications, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, was significantly higher among patients who were on insulin compared to those not on insulin (50.7 % versus 27.5 %; p = 0.005). Additionally, the average of the last three HbA1C readings and the overall average HbA1C readings were significantly higher among patients who were on insulin (9.67 % versus 9.07 %; p = 0.001) compared to those not on insulin (9.64 % versus 9.11 %; p = 0.005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study did not find a significant association between the use of insulin and cardiovascular complications. The association between insulin therapy and the development of other diabetes complications warrants further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 102168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002184/pdfft?md5=009719cf703073428eebbac1c5c4b243&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424002184-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002184\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言尽管有了新的保护心脏的口服降糖药,胰岛素仍经常被推荐作为血红蛋白 A1C(HbA1C)≥ 9 的 2 型糖尿病的附加疗法。将胰岛素作为不受控制的高血糖(HbA1C≥9)患者的一种选择与心血管后遗症的关系一直备受质疑。本研究旨在探讨未控制高血糖的 2 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素与心血管影响之间的关联。方法 在沙特国王大学医疗城(KSUMC)开展了一项回顾性观察队列研究,以确定两组患者(使用胰岛素的 HbA1C≥9% 患者与未使用胰岛素的 HbA1C≥9% 患者)之间的心血管并发症。研究纳入了2015年至2018年期间HbA1C≥9的2型糖尿病患者,这些患者在医院接受了至少5年的随访,直至2022年底。结果研究共纳入366名患者,其中286名患者使用胰岛素,80名患者未使用胰岛素。两组患者的中位 HbA1C 基线水平相当(10.2 对 9.8)。随访 5 年后,两组之间没有明显差异(使用胰岛素的患者为 29.4%,未使用胰岛素的患者为 18.8%;P = 0.065)。但是,与未使用胰岛素的患者相比,使用胰岛素的患者发生视网膜病变、肾病和神经病变等其他糖尿病并发症的比例明显更高(50.7% 对 27.5%;P = 0.005)。此外,与未使用胰岛素的患者(9.64 % 对 9.11 %;p = 0.005)相比,使用胰岛素的患者最近三次 HbA1C 读数的平均值和总体 HbA1C 读数的平均值明显更高(9.67 % 对 9.07 %;p = 0.001)。胰岛素治疗与其他糖尿病并发症之间的关系值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between uncontrolled hyperglycemia (Type-2 Diabetes) and cardiovascular sequelae in patients with and without insulin

Introduction

Despite the availability of new cardio-protective oral hypoglycemic drugs, insulin is often recommended as an add-on therapy for type-2 diabetes with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) ≥ 9. Introducing insulin as a choice for patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia (HbA1C≥9) has been questionably associated with cardiovascular sequelae. This study aims to examine the association between insulin use and cardiovascular effects in type-2 diabetic patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia.

Methodology

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to identify cardiovascular complications between the two groups (patients with HbA1C≥9% on insulin versus those with HbA1C≥9% without insulin) at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). Patients with type-2 diabetes whose HbA1C was ≥ 9 during the period from 2015 to 2018 and who were followed up within the hospital for at least 5 years until the end of 2022 were included in the study.

Results

A total of 366 patients were included in the study; 286 patients were on insulin, while 80 patients were not. The median baseline HbA1C levels were comparable between the two groups (10.2 versus 9.8). After 5 years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the groups (29.4 % of insulin users versus 18.8 % of non-insulin users; p = 0.065). However, the incidence of other diabetes complications, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, was significantly higher among patients who were on insulin compared to those not on insulin (50.7 % versus 27.5 %; p = 0.005). Additionally, the average of the last three HbA1C readings and the overall average HbA1C readings were significantly higher among patients who were on insulin (9.67 % versus 9.07 %; p = 0.001) compared to those not on insulin (9.64 % versus 9.11 %; p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our study did not find a significant association between the use of insulin and cardiovascular complications. The association between insulin therapy and the development of other diabetes complications warrants further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Anabolic-androgenic steroid supplementation on female health and offspring: Mechanisms, side effects, and medical perspectives Bioadhesive hybrid system of niosomes and pH sensitive in situ gel for itraconazole ocular delivery: Dual approach for efficient treatment of fungal infections Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective Real-World safety and effectiveness of evolocumab in primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia in Saudi Arabia Inside Front Cover - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1