仅基于计算机断层扫描图像的原发性肺部病变和结节病放疗自切术

Stephen Skett , Tina Patel , Didier Duprez , Sunnia Gupta , Tucker Netherton , Christoph Trauernicht , Sarah Aldridge , David Eaton , Carlos Cardenas , Laurence E. Court , Daniel Smith , Ajay Aggarwal
{"title":"仅基于计算机断层扫描图像的原发性肺部病变和结节病放疗自切术","authors":"Stephen Skett ,&nbsp;Tina Patel ,&nbsp;Didier Duprez ,&nbsp;Sunnia Gupta ,&nbsp;Tucker Netherton ,&nbsp;Christoph Trauernicht ,&nbsp;Sarah Aldridge ,&nbsp;David Eaton ,&nbsp;Carlos Cardenas ,&nbsp;Laurence E. Court ,&nbsp;Daniel Smith ,&nbsp;Ajay Aggarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity &gt; 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076/pdfft?md5=66dee5a039c29412f0b49ae3be06dd45&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Skett ,&nbsp;Tina Patel ,&nbsp;Didier Duprez ,&nbsp;Sunnia Gupta ,&nbsp;Tucker Netherton ,&nbsp;Christoph Trauernicht ,&nbsp;Sarah Aldridge ,&nbsp;David Eaton ,&nbsp;Carlos Cardenas ,&nbsp;Laurence E. Court ,&nbsp;Daniel Smith ,&nbsp;Ajay Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity &gt; 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076/pdfft?md5=66dee5a039c29412f0b49ae3be06dd45&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001076-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在许多诊所,正电子发射断层扫描无法使用,临床医生的时间也极为有限。在此,我们介绍一种深度学习模型,该模型仅基于计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,为接受姑息性放疗的原发性肺部病变和/或肺门/纵隔结节疾病患者自动勾画大体病变轮廓。采用基于锚点的后处理方法去除无关的自动轮廓区域。两名肿瘤顾问根据体积相似性(Dice 相似性系数[DSC]、表面 Dice 系数、第 95 百分位数 Hausdorff 距离[HD95]和平均表面距离)对自动轮廓进行了定量评估,并对可用性进行了评分。结果锚点处理成功地从自动描绘的疾病中移除了所有错误区域,并确定了两个因 "遗漏 "疾病而被排除在进一步分析之外的病例。平均 DSC 和 HD95 分别为 0.8 ± 0.1 毫米和 10.5 ± 7.3 毫米。64%的病例的临床轮廓 "完全覆盖"(灵敏度为 0.99)。结论我们的自动轮廓绘制模型显示,仅根据 CT 就能为约三分之二的肺部放疗患者绘制出临床可用的疾病轮廓。在临床应用之前,还需要进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images

Background and purpose

In many clinics, positron-emission tomography is unavailable and clinician time extremely limited. Here we describe a deep-learning model for autocontouring gross disease for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for primary lung lesions and/or hilar/mediastinal nodal disease, based only on computed tomography (CT) images.

Materials and methods

An autocontouring model (nnU-Net) was trained to contour gross disease in 379 cases (352 training, 27 test); 11 further test cases from an external centre were also included. Anchor-point-based post-processing was applied to remove extraneous autocontoured regions. The autocontours were evaluated quantitatively in terms of volume similarity (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], surface Dice coefficient, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance [HD95], and mean surface distance), and scored for usability by two consultant oncologists. The magnitude of treatment margin needed to account for geometric discrepancies was also assessed.

Results

The anchor point process successfully removed all erroneous regions from the autocontoured disease, and identified two cases to be excluded from further analysis due to ‘missed’ disease. The average DSC and HD95 were 0.8 ± 0.1 and 10.5 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. A 10-mm uniform margin-distance applied to the autocontoured region was found to yield “full coverage” (sensitivity > 0.99) of the clinical contour for 64 % of cases. Ninety-seven percent of evaluated autocontours were scored by both clinicians as requiring no or minor edits.

Conclusions

Our autocontouring model was shown to produce clinically usable disease outlines, based on CT alone, for approximately two-thirds of patients undergoing lung radiotherapy. Further work is necessary to improve this before clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1