Amanda E Messerlie, Leslie M Guidotti Breting, John E Calamari, Jerry J Sweet, Elizabeth K Geary, Jenna Axelrod, Alec C Neale, Monika A Waszczuk
{"title":"基于任务的注意力控制:焦虑和年龄的作用","authors":"Amanda E Messerlie, Leslie M Guidotti Breting, John E Calamari, Jerry J Sweet, Elizabeth K Geary, Jenna Axelrod, Alec C Neale, Monika A Waszczuk","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attentional Control Theory (ACT) posits that anxiety impacts cognitive functioning through interference in working memory and processing efficiency, resulting in performance deficits in set-shifting and inhibition. Few studies have examined the effects of anxiety on set-shifting and inhibition in clinical samples or how these relationships might be affected by age. The current study tested whether increased age, elevated anxiety, and their interaction were associated with reduced performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Symptom and neuropsychological testing data were obtained from outpatient participants presenting at an academic medical center (N = 521; mean age = 50.39 years, SD = 22.35, range = 18-90; 47.4% female; 78.3% White). The Trail Making Test Difference score was used to assess set-shifting and the Stroop Color-Word Test Interference score was used to assess inhibition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for demographic variables, ADHD diagnosis, depression symptoms, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), both age and anxiety were significant predictors of set-shifting (β = 0.45 and β = 0.18, respectively, ps < 0.001) and inhibition (β = -0.37, p < 0.001 and β = -0.19, p = 0.001, respectively). No interaction was found between age and anxiety in the prediction of set-shifting or inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Congruent with ACT, anxiety was associated with worse performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition. Older age was an independent predictor of worse set-shifting and inhibition but did not moderate the relationship between anxiety and attentional control, suggesting that anxiety adversely affected working memory and processing efficiency equivalently across the adult lifespan. The results highlight the importance of anxiety assessment in neuropsychological evaluation in patients of all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda E Messerlie, Leslie M Guidotti Breting, John E Calamari, Jerry J Sweet, Elizabeth K Geary, Jenna Axelrod, Alec C Neale, Monika A Waszczuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attentional Control Theory (ACT) posits that anxiety impacts cognitive functioning through interference in working memory and processing efficiency, resulting in performance deficits in set-shifting and inhibition. Few studies have examined the effects of anxiety on set-shifting and inhibition in clinical samples or how these relationships might be affected by age. The current study tested whether increased age, elevated anxiety, and their interaction were associated with reduced performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Symptom and neuropsychological testing data were obtained from outpatient participants presenting at an academic medical center (N = 521; mean age = 50.39 years, SD = 22.35, range = 18-90; 47.4% female; 78.3% White). The Trail Making Test Difference score was used to assess set-shifting and the Stroop Color-Word Test Interference score was used to assess inhibition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for demographic variables, ADHD diagnosis, depression symptoms, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), both age and anxiety were significant predictors of set-shifting (β = 0.45 and β = 0.18, respectively, ps < 0.001) and inhibition (β = -0.37, p < 0.001 and β = -0.19, p = 0.001, respectively). No interaction was found between age and anxiety in the prediction of set-shifting or inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Congruent with ACT, anxiety was associated with worse performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition. Older age was an independent predictor of worse set-shifting and inhibition but did not moderate the relationship between anxiety and attentional control, suggesting that anxiety adversely affected working memory and processing efficiency equivalently across the adult lifespan. The results highlight the importance of anxiety assessment in neuropsychological evaluation in patients of all ages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age.
Objective: Attentional Control Theory (ACT) posits that anxiety impacts cognitive functioning through interference in working memory and processing efficiency, resulting in performance deficits in set-shifting and inhibition. Few studies have examined the effects of anxiety on set-shifting and inhibition in clinical samples or how these relationships might be affected by age. The current study tested whether increased age, elevated anxiety, and their interaction were associated with reduced performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition.
Method: Symptom and neuropsychological testing data were obtained from outpatient participants presenting at an academic medical center (N = 521; mean age = 50.39 years, SD = 22.35, range = 18-90; 47.4% female; 78.3% White). The Trail Making Test Difference score was used to assess set-shifting and the Stroop Color-Word Test Interference score was used to assess inhibition.
Results: After controlling for demographic variables, ADHD diagnosis, depression symptoms, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), both age and anxiety were significant predictors of set-shifting (β = 0.45 and β = 0.18, respectively, ps < 0.001) and inhibition (β = -0.37, p < 0.001 and β = -0.19, p = 0.001, respectively). No interaction was found between age and anxiety in the prediction of set-shifting or inhibition.
Conclusion: Congruent with ACT, anxiety was associated with worse performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition. Older age was an independent predictor of worse set-shifting and inhibition but did not moderate the relationship between anxiety and attentional control, suggesting that anxiety adversely affected working memory and processing efficiency equivalently across the adult lifespan. The results highlight the importance of anxiety assessment in neuropsychological evaluation in patients of all ages.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.