Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Shayan Arab, Poriya Minaee, SeyedMohammad Eazi, Sajjad Ahmadpour
{"title":"胶质瘤患者接种自体肿瘤裂解物树突状细胞疫苗的临床效用:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Shayan Arab, Poriya Minaee, SeyedMohammad Eazi, Sajjad Ahmadpour","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promise for glioma treatment, but optimal use remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined DC vaccine efficacy and safety for gliomas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. From the date of inception to October 23, 2023, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus have been thoroughly evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 12 studies with 998 patients and a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 56 years were included. Across 12 articles, DC vaccine 6-month overall survival (OS) was 100% [95% confidence interval {95%CI}: 100%–100%]. Respectively, 12-month OS reported 75% [95%CI: 65%–85%] but declined to 32% [95%CI: 20%–43%] for 24-month OS. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival reached 49% [95%CI: 21%–77%] and 19% [95%CI:8%–30%]. Studying radiological outcomes shows that complete response and partial response rates were 13% [95%CI: 17%–42%], and 26% [95%CI: 10%–42%], though stable disease reached 33% [95%CI: 15%–51%], suggesting predominant antineoplastic effects. The progressive disease rate also was 24% [95%CI: 9%–57%].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In gliomas, DC vaccinations show a temporary efficacy; stability is more prevalent than regression. Impacts favor decreased resistance to early disease. Enhancing efficacy remains critical. Early therapy can be enhanced by appropriate supplementary therapy integration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14110","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical utility of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination for patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjani, Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand, Pouria Delbari, Shayan Arab, Poriya Minaee, SeyedMohammad Eazi, Sajjad Ahmadpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promise for glioma treatment, but optimal use remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined DC vaccine efficacy and safety for gliomas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. From the date of inception to October 23, 2023, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus have been thoroughly evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 12 studies with 998 patients and a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 56 years were included. Across 12 articles, DC vaccine 6-month overall survival (OS) was 100% [95% confidence interval {95%CI}: 100%–100%]. Respectively, 12-month OS reported 75% [95%CI: 65%–85%] but declined to 32% [95%CI: 20%–43%] for 24-month OS. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival reached 49% [95%CI: 21%–77%] and 19% [95%CI:8%–30%]. Studying radiological outcomes shows that complete response and partial response rates were 13% [95%CI: 17%–42%], and 26% [95%CI: 10%–42%], though stable disease reached 33% [95%CI: 15%–51%], suggesting predominant antineoplastic effects. The progressive disease rate also was 24% [95%CI: 9%–57%].</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In gliomas, DC vaccinations show a temporary efficacy; stability is more prevalent than regression. Impacts favor decreased resistance to early disease. Enhancing efficacy remains critical. Early therapy can be enhanced by appropriate supplementary therapy integration.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14110\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The clinical utility of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination for patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines show promise for glioma treatment, but optimal use remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined DC vaccine efficacy and safety for gliomas.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. From the date of inception to October 23, 2023, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus have been thoroughly evaluated.
Results
A total of 12 studies with 998 patients and a mean age ranging from 40.2 to 56 years were included. Across 12 articles, DC vaccine 6-month overall survival (OS) was 100% [95% confidence interval {95%CI}: 100%–100%]. Respectively, 12-month OS reported 75% [95%CI: 65%–85%] but declined to 32% [95%CI: 20%–43%] for 24-month OS. 6- and 12-month progression-free survival reached 49% [95%CI: 21%–77%] and 19% [95%CI:8%–30%]. Studying radiological outcomes shows that complete response and partial response rates were 13% [95%CI: 17%–42%], and 26% [95%CI: 10%–42%], though stable disease reached 33% [95%CI: 15%–51%], suggesting predominant antineoplastic effects. The progressive disease rate also was 24% [95%CI: 9%–57%].
Conclusions
In gliomas, DC vaccinations show a temporary efficacy; stability is more prevalent than regression. Impacts favor decreased resistance to early disease. Enhancing efficacy remains critical. Early therapy can be enhanced by appropriate supplementary therapy integration.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.