髂胫束综合征保守治疗策略对跑步者疼痛和功能的影响:系统综述。

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456
Alberto Sanchez-Alvarado, Chaitrali Bokil, Michael Cassel, Tilman Engel
{"title":"髂胫束综合征保守治疗策略对跑步者疼痛和功能的影响:系统综述。","authors":"Alberto Sanchez-Alvarado, Chaitrali Bokil, Michael Cassel, Tilman Engel","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review summarizes the efficacy of conservative treatment strategies on pain and function in runners with iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), a prevalent running injury constituting about 10% of all running-related injuries. The multifactorial nature of ITBS necessitates diverse treatment approaches; yet, a consensus on an optimal conservative regimen remains unreported. This review seeks to update and expand upon existing literature with recent rehabilitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases, from inception to June 31, 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) reporting of conservative treatments for ITBS in adult runners and (2) pain and function defined as main outcome parameters. The methodological quality was evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen out of 616 records met the inclusion criteria (201 participants), including five randomized controlled trials, one case-control study, one pre-test post-test study, and six case studies. Different active and passive treatment strategies were applied as single (five studies) or combined (eight studies) treatments. The average methodological quality was deemed good. Large between-study heterogeneity was present, impeding a meta-analysis to be performed. Hip abductor strengthening (HAS) exercise emerged as a common strategy. The intervention effects on pain reduction ranged from 27% to 100%, and functional improvement from 10% to 57%, over 2 to 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A conservative treatment approach incorporating HAS exercises, possibly augmented by shockwave or manual therapy, is effective for mitigating pain and enhancing function in ITBS-afflicted runners. Finally, the potential of emerging strategies like gait retraining requires further exploration through rigorous trials and comprehensive evidence. Addressing these gaps could refine ITBS management, enhancing treatment outcomes and facilitating runners' return to sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Sanchez-Alvarado, Chaitrali Bokil, Michael Cassel, Tilman Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review summarizes the efficacy of conservative treatment strategies on pain and function in runners with iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), a prevalent running injury constituting about 10% of all running-related injuries. The multifactorial nature of ITBS necessitates diverse treatment approaches; yet, a consensus on an optimal conservative regimen remains unreported. This review seeks to update and expand upon existing literature with recent rehabilitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases, from inception to June 31, 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) reporting of conservative treatments for ITBS in adult runners and (2) pain and function defined as main outcome parameters. The methodological quality was evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen out of 616 records met the inclusion criteria (201 participants), including five randomized controlled trials, one case-control study, one pre-test post-test study, and six case studies. Different active and passive treatment strategies were applied as single (five studies) or combined (eight studies) treatments. The average methodological quality was deemed good. Large between-study heterogeneity was present, impeding a meta-analysis to be performed. Hip abductor strengthening (HAS) exercise emerged as a common strategy. The intervention effects on pain reduction ranged from 27% to 100%, and functional improvement from 10% to 57%, over 2 to 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A conservative treatment approach incorporating HAS exercises, possibly augmented by shockwave or manual therapy, is effective for mitigating pain and enhancing function in ITBS-afflicted runners. Finally, the potential of emerging strategies like gait retraining requires further exploration through rigorous trials and comprehensive evidence. Addressing these gaps could refine ITBS management, enhancing treatment outcomes and facilitating runners' return to sport.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377285/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1386456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:髂胫束综合征(ITBS)是一种常见的跑步损伤,约占所有跑步相关损伤的 10%,本系统综述总结了保守治疗策略对髂胫束综合征患者疼痛和功能的疗效。髂胫束综合征的多因素性质要求采用不同的治疗方法;然而,关于最佳保守治疗方案的共识仍未见报道。本综述旨在更新和扩充现有文献,介绍最新的康复方法:方法:在 Medline、Web of Science 和 CINHAL 数据库中进行了系统性检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 6 月 31 日。纳入标准为(1) 关于成年跑步者 ITBS 保守疗法的报告;(2) 将疼痛和功能定义为主要结果参数。研究方法的质量采用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具进行评估:在 616 份记录中,有 13 份符合纳入标准(201 名参与者),其中包括 5 项随机对照试验、1 项病例对照研究、1 项前测后测研究和 6 项病例研究。不同的主动和被动治疗策略被用作单一治疗(5 项研究)或综合治疗(8 项研究)。研究方法的平均质量被认为是良好的。研究之间存在较大的异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。髋关节内收肌强化(HAS)锻炼是一种常见的策略。在2至8周的时间内,干预对疼痛减轻的效果从27%到100%不等,对功能改善的效果从10%到57%不等:结论:对受 ITBS 影响的跑步者而言,结合 HAS 运动的保守治疗方法,并辅以冲击波或徒手疗法,可有效减轻疼痛并增强功能。最后,步态再训练等新兴策略的潜力需要通过严格的试验和全面的证据来进一步探索。弥补这些不足可以完善 ITBS 的管理,提高治疗效果,促进跑步者重返运动场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review.

Introduction: This systematic review summarizes the efficacy of conservative treatment strategies on pain and function in runners with iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), a prevalent running injury constituting about 10% of all running-related injuries. The multifactorial nature of ITBS necessitates diverse treatment approaches; yet, a consensus on an optimal conservative regimen remains unreported. This review seeks to update and expand upon existing literature with recent rehabilitative approaches.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, and CINHAL databases, from inception to June 31, 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) reporting of conservative treatments for ITBS in adult runners and (2) pain and function defined as main outcome parameters. The methodological quality was evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.

Results: Thirteen out of 616 records met the inclusion criteria (201 participants), including five randomized controlled trials, one case-control study, one pre-test post-test study, and six case studies. Different active and passive treatment strategies were applied as single (five studies) or combined (eight studies) treatments. The average methodological quality was deemed good. Large between-study heterogeneity was present, impeding a meta-analysis to be performed. Hip abductor strengthening (HAS) exercise emerged as a common strategy. The intervention effects on pain reduction ranged from 27% to 100%, and functional improvement from 10% to 57%, over 2 to 8 weeks.

Conclusion: A conservative treatment approach incorporating HAS exercises, possibly augmented by shockwave or manual therapy, is effective for mitigating pain and enhancing function in ITBS-afflicted runners. Finally, the potential of emerging strategies like gait retraining requires further exploration through rigorous trials and comprehensive evidence. Addressing these gaps could refine ITBS management, enhancing treatment outcomes and facilitating runners' return to sport.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review. Identification of distinct physical activity profiles through adolescence: a longitudinal qualitative description study. Performing performance: young aspiring athletes' presentation of athletic identity. Validation of the basic need satisfaction for sport scale in Ethiopian athletes. Unlocking high-value football fans: unsupervised machine learning for customer segmentation and lifetime value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1