脑电图双相干峰值高度的降低表明全身麻醉手术期间镇痛不足。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5
Rieko Uno, Satoshi Hagihira, Satoshi Aihara, Takahiko Kamibayashi
{"title":"脑电图双相干峰值高度的降低表明全身麻醉手术期间镇痛不足。","authors":"Rieko Uno, Satoshi Hagihira, Satoshi Aihara, Takahiko Kamibayashi","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Superior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno  = R000048907.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"855-864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Rieko Uno, Satoshi Hagihira, Satoshi Aihara, Takahiko Kamibayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Superior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno  = R000048907.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"855-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03406-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,切口后脑电图双相干性的两个峰值高度(pBIC-高,pBIC-低)会降低,并在使用芬太尼后恢复。我们研究了 pBIC 是否是手术期间镇痛是否充分的良好指标:经当地伦理委员会批准后,我们招募了 50 名预定进行择期手术的患者(27-65 岁,ASA-PS I 或 II 级)。除标准麻醉监测仪外,我们还使用了 BIS 监测仪和免费的 A2000 双频谱分析仪来评估 pBIC。切皮前完全注射 5 µg/kg 芬太尼,并使用七氟醚维持麻醉。切皮后,当pBIC-高或pBIC-低的峰值绝对值下降10%时(依次命名为LT10-高组和LT10-低组),或当任一峰值下降到20%以下时(BL20-高组和BL20-低组),再注射1克/千克芬太尼,以检查其对下降峰值的影响:LT10-高组在使用芬太尼前 5 分钟、使用芬太尼时和使用芬太尼后 5 分钟的 pBIC-高的平均值和标准偏差分别为 39.8%(10.9%)、26.9%(10.5%)和 35.7%(12.5%)。而 LT10 低组的 pBIC 低值分别为 39.5%(6.0%)、26.8%(6.4%)和 35.0%(7.0%)。BL20 高组的 pBIC 高值分别为 26.3%(5.6%)、16.5%(2.6%)和 25.7%(7.0%)。而 BL20 低组的 pBIC 低分别为 26.7%(4.8%)、17.4%(1.8%)和 26.9%(5.7%)。同时,在这些触发点上,血流动力学参数没有发生显著变化:结论:与标准麻醉监测相比,pBICs 是手术过程中更好的镇痛指标:临床试验编号和注册网址:UMIN ID:umin000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno = R000048907。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia.

Background: Studies show that the two peak heights of electroencephalographic bicoherence (pBIC-high, pBIC-low) decrease after incision and are restored by fentanyl administration. We investigated whether pBICs are good indicators for adequacy of analgesia during surgery.

Methods: After local ethical committee approval, we enrolled 50 patients (27-65 years, ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled elective surgery. Besides standard anesthesia monitors, to assess pBICs, we used a BIS monitor and freeware Bispectrum Analyzer for A2000. Fentanyl 5 µg/kg was completely administered before incision, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. After skin incision, when the peak of pBIC-high or pBIC-low decreased by 10% in absolute value (named LT10-high and LT10-low groups in order) or when either peak decreased to below 20% (BL20-high and BL20-low groups), an additional 1 g/kg of fentanyl was administered to examine its effect on the peak that showed a decrease.

Results: The mean values and standard deviation for pBIC-high 5 min before fentanyl administration, at the time of fentanyl administration, and 5 min after fentanyl administration for LT10-high group were 39.8% (10.9%), 26.9% (10.5%), and 35.7% (12.5%). And those for pBIC-low for LT10-low group were 39.5% (6.0%), 26.8% (6.4%) and 35.0% (7.0%). Those for pBIC-high for BL20-high group were 26.3% (5.6%), 16.5% (2.6%), and 25.7% (7.0%). And those for pBIC-low for BL20-low group were 26.7% (4.8%), 17.4% (1.8%) and 26.9% (5.7%), respectively. Meanwhile, at these trigger points, hemodynamic parameters didn't show significant changes.

Conclusion: Superior to standard anesthesia monitoring, pBICs are better indicators of analgesia during surgery.

Trial registry: Clinical trial Number and registry URL: UMIN ID: UMIN000042843 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno  = R000048907.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia. Advantages of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. McGRATH MAC size 1 vs. 2 blades: infant intubation time. Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study. Vasopressors against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1