五种形式的胁迫 "自制 "儿童性剥削材料:批判性解释综述》。

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Trauma Violence & Abuse Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1177/15248380241271376
Genevieve Bloxsom, Gemma McKibbin, Cathy Humphreys, Jennifer Davidson, Nick Halfpenny
{"title":"五种形式的胁迫 \"自制 \"儿童性剥削材料:批判性解释综述》。","authors":"Genevieve Bloxsom, Gemma McKibbin, Cathy Humphreys, Jennifer Davidson, Nick Halfpenny","doi":"10.1177/15248380241271376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review explored how the phenomenon of coerced \"self-produced\" child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) has been constructed in the literature using Critical Interpretative Synthesis. Selected keywords were systematically searched on relevant databases. Types of papers included were: peer-reviewed research articles; conceptual papers; commentary papers; theses; book chapters; systematic reviews; and government reports. Papers published in English between January 2005 and November 2022 were included. The initial search revealed 1,021 papers, after two reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 papers were selected for the final sample. Findings indicated five forms of coerced \"self-produced\" CSEM: Solicitation; Peer Sexting; Viral Challenge; Sextortion; and Financial Coercion. The forms are described and critically analyzed through an \"Accountability Lens.\" This Lens was developed to be victim-centered including identifying the coercive actions of the person responsible for the exploitation. The review found an absence of a consistent victim-centered approach to how the phenomena of coerced \"self-produced\" CSEM is understood that would ensure children are not held responsible for being exploited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five Forms of Coerced \\\"Self-Produced\\\" Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Genevieve Bloxsom, Gemma McKibbin, Cathy Humphreys, Jennifer Davidson, Nick Halfpenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380241271376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review explored how the phenomenon of coerced \\\"self-produced\\\" child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) has been constructed in the literature using Critical Interpretative Synthesis. Selected keywords were systematically searched on relevant databases. Types of papers included were: peer-reviewed research articles; conceptual papers; commentary papers; theses; book chapters; systematic reviews; and government reports. Papers published in English between January 2005 and November 2022 were included. The initial search revealed 1,021 papers, after two reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 papers were selected for the final sample. Findings indicated five forms of coerced \\\"self-produced\\\" CSEM: Solicitation; Peer Sexting; Viral Challenge; Sextortion; and Financial Coercion. The forms are described and critically analyzed through an \\\"Accountability Lens.\\\" This Lens was developed to be victim-centered including identifying the coercive actions of the person responsible for the exploitation. The review found an absence of a consistent victim-centered approach to how the phenomena of coerced \\\"self-produced\\\" CSEM is understood that would ensure children are not held responsible for being exploited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241271376\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241271376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述采用批判性解释综合法探讨了文献中如何构建被胁迫 "自行制作 "的儿童性剥削材料(CSEM)这一现象。在相关数据库中系统地搜索了选定的关键词。收录的论文类型包括:经同行评审的研究文章;概念性论文;评论性论文;论文;书籍章节;系统性综述;以及政府报告。收录了 2005 年 1 月至 2022 年 11 月间发表的英文论文。初步检索发现了 1,021 篇论文,经过两名审稿人应用纳入和排除标准后,选出 38 篇论文作为最终样本。研究结果表明,胁迫 "自制 "CSEM 有五种形式:引诱、同伴短讯、病毒挑战、短讯勒索和经济胁迫。通过 "问责透镜 "对这些形式进行了描述和批判性分析。该透镜以受害者为中心,包括识别剥削责任人的胁迫行为。审查发现,对于如何理解 "自我生产 "的胁迫性儿童色情剥削现象,缺乏一致的以受害者为中心的方法,而这种方法将确保儿童不必为受到剥削负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Five Forms of Coerced "Self-Produced" Child Sexual Exploitation Material: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

This review explored how the phenomenon of coerced "self-produced" child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) has been constructed in the literature using Critical Interpretative Synthesis. Selected keywords were systematically searched on relevant databases. Types of papers included were: peer-reviewed research articles; conceptual papers; commentary papers; theses; book chapters; systematic reviews; and government reports. Papers published in English between January 2005 and November 2022 were included. The initial search revealed 1,021 papers, after two reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 papers were selected for the final sample. Findings indicated five forms of coerced "self-produced" CSEM: Solicitation; Peer Sexting; Viral Challenge; Sextortion; and Financial Coercion. The forms are described and critically analyzed through an "Accountability Lens." This Lens was developed to be victim-centered including identifying the coercive actions of the person responsible for the exploitation. The review found an absence of a consistent victim-centered approach to how the phenomena of coerced "self-produced" CSEM is understood that would ensure children are not held responsible for being exploited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Landscape of Trauma-Informed Care in Social Work: A Critical Scoping Review. The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cognitive Control Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies Protective and Promotive Factors in Migrant and Refugee Children Facing Violence: A Systematic Review Psychological Predictors of Recidivism for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Systematic Scoping Review Outcomes Associated with Arrest for Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1