Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini
{"title":"常规白内障手术中一次性使用器械对经济和环境影响的估算。","authors":"Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S467872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and interview.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for RUIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S467872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and interview.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for RUIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S467872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S467872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在欧洲和美国的六家眼科中心估算一次性使用器械(SUI)对实施标准白内障手术的经济和环境影响:在线调查和访谈:设计:通过在线调查、后续问卷和访谈进行成本比较分析。碳足迹计算由 ClimatePartner 完成:可重复使用器械(RUI)的年度成本根据各中心提供的数据计算。可重复使用器械(SUI)的年成本是根据一套 5 件的一次性白内障器械的平均销售价格和报告的年白内障手术量估算的。白内障手术器械的碳足迹计算涵盖了从生产到报废的整个生命周期:结果:在本研究包括的 6 个中心中,有 4 个中心发现 SUI 的年成本低于或类似于 RUI 的年成本。在 SUI 被证明最具成本效益的中心,每台器械的消毒成本也最高。白内障手术器械使用 5 年的碳足迹为:未回收利用的 SUI 为 5478.2 千克二氧化碳当量,回收利用的 SUI 为 4639.9 千克二氧化碳当量,RUI 为 20.6 千克二氧化碳当量:该研究表明,在消毒成本高昂的多专科医院,SUI 可以作为使用 RUI 的替代解决方案。
Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.
Purpose: To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.
Setting: Online survey and interview.
Design: Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.
Methods: Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.
Results: Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO2 eq for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO2 eq for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO2 eq for RUIs.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.