常规白内障手术中一次性使用器械对经济和环境影响的估算。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S467872
Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini
{"title":"常规白内障手术中一次性使用器械对经济和环境影响的估算。","authors":"Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S467872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and interview.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for RUIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Qin, Ben LaHood, Ivo Guber, Sandro Di Simplicio Cherubini\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S467872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and interview.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO<sub>2 eq</sub> for RUIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S467872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S467872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在欧洲和美国的六家眼科中心估算一次性使用器械(SUI)对实施标准白内障手术的经济和环境影响:在线调查和访谈:设计:通过在线调查、后续问卷和访谈进行成本比较分析。碳足迹计算由 ClimatePartner 完成:可重复使用器械(RUI)的年度成本根据各中心提供的数据计算。可重复使用器械(SUI)的年成本是根据一套 5 件的一次性白内障器械的平均销售价格和报告的年白内障手术量估算的。白内障手术器械的碳足迹计算涵盖了从生产到报废的整个生命周期:结果:在本研究包括的 6 个中心中,有 4 个中心发现 SUI 的年成本低于或类似于 RUI 的年成本。在 SUI 被证明最具成本效益的中心,每台器械的消毒成本也最高。白内障手术器械使用 5 年的碳足迹为:未回收利用的 SUI 为 5478.2 千克二氧化碳当量,回收利用的 SUI 为 4639.9 千克二氧化碳当量,RUI 为 20.6 千克二氧化碳当量:该研究表明,在消毒成本高昂的多专科医院,SUI 可以作为使用 RUI 的替代解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.

Purpose: To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.

Setting: Online survey and interview.

Design: Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.

Methods: Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.

Results: Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO2 eq for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO2 eq for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO2 eq for RUIs.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocular Surface Disease and Dry Eye Severity in Glaucoma Patients at Urban Private Eye Care Centres in Malaysia. Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1