中国、帝国与世界人类学:对 Hamilton & Chang 的答复》,AT 27(6)

IF 1.5 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology Today Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1111/1467-8322.12906
Magnus Fiskesjö
{"title":"中国、帝国与世界人类学:对 Hamilton & Chang 的答复》,AT 27(6)","authors":"Magnus Fiskesjö","doi":"10.1111/1467-8322.12906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This comment critically examines the legacy of Chinese anthropologist Fei Xiaotong and its implications for understanding China's approach to non-Chinese peoples on the territory that became modern China. The author argues that Fei's concept of ‘pluralistic unity’ has been misinterpreted and actually represents a continuation of China's imperial ideology of absorbing conquered populations. The piece links this ideology to current Chinese policies, particularly the treatment of Uyghurs and other non-Chinese peoples. It contends that the Chinese Communist Party abandoned its original anti-imperialist stance in favour of continuing imperial practices, resulting in the transformation of multiple nations into nominal ‘minorities’ and then their erasure under the guise of national unity. The author calls for a reassessment of China's anthropology through the lens of colonialism, racism and imperialism, arguing that China's imperial legacy must be critically examined to understand its current policies and actions. The article situates this discussion within the broader context of emerging literature on Chinese settler colonialism. It emphasizes the need for a comparative approach in studying China's past and present imperialism.</p>","PeriodicalId":46293,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHINA, EMPIRE AND WORLD ANTHROPOLOGY: A reply to Hamilton & Chang, AT 27(6)\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Fiskesjö\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8322.12906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This comment critically examines the legacy of Chinese anthropologist Fei Xiaotong and its implications for understanding China's approach to non-Chinese peoples on the territory that became modern China. The author argues that Fei's concept of ‘pluralistic unity’ has been misinterpreted and actually represents a continuation of China's imperial ideology of absorbing conquered populations. The piece links this ideology to current Chinese policies, particularly the treatment of Uyghurs and other non-Chinese peoples. It contends that the Chinese Communist Party abandoned its original anti-imperialist stance in favour of continuing imperial practices, resulting in the transformation of multiple nations into nominal ‘minorities’ and then their erasure under the guise of national unity. The author calls for a reassessment of China's anthropology through the lens of colonialism, racism and imperialism, arguing that China's imperial legacy must be critically examined to understand its current policies and actions. The article situates this discussion within the broader context of emerging literature on Chinese settler colonialism. It emphasizes the need for a comparative approach in studying China's past and present imperialism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.12906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8322.12906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论批判性地探讨了中国人类学家费孝通的遗产及其对理解中国如何对待现代中国领土上的非华夏族群的影响。作者认为,费孝通的 "多元一体 "概念被曲解了,实际上代表了中国吸纳被征服人口的帝国意识形态的延续。文章将这一意识形态与中国当前的政策联系起来,尤其是对维吾尔族和其他非中国民族的待遇。文章认为,中国共产党放弃了最初的反帝立场,转而继续帝国主义的做法,导致多个民族转变为名义上的 "少数民族",然后在民族团结的幌子下将其消灭。作者呼吁通过殖民主义、种族主义和帝国主义的视角重新评估中国的人类学,认为必须批判性地审视中国的帝国主义遗产,以理解其当前的政策和行动。文章将这一讨论置于关于中国殖民定居者的新兴文献的大背景下。文章强调,在研究中国过去和现在的帝国主义时,需要采用比较的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHINA, EMPIRE AND WORLD ANTHROPOLOGY: A reply to Hamilton & Chang, AT 27(6)

This comment critically examines the legacy of Chinese anthropologist Fei Xiaotong and its implications for understanding China's approach to non-Chinese peoples on the territory that became modern China. The author argues that Fei's concept of ‘pluralistic unity’ has been misinterpreted and actually represents a continuation of China's imperial ideology of absorbing conquered populations. The piece links this ideology to current Chinese policies, particularly the treatment of Uyghurs and other non-Chinese peoples. It contends that the Chinese Communist Party abandoned its original anti-imperialist stance in favour of continuing imperial practices, resulting in the transformation of multiple nations into nominal ‘minorities’ and then their erasure under the guise of national unity. The author calls for a reassessment of China's anthropology through the lens of colonialism, racism and imperialism, arguing that China's imperial legacy must be critically examined to understand its current policies and actions. The article situates this discussion within the broader context of emerging literature on Chinese settler colonialism. It emphasizes the need for a comparative approach in studying China's past and present imperialism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology Today
Anthropology Today ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Anthropology Today is a bimonthly publication which aims to provide a forum for the application of anthropological analysis to public and topical issues, while reflecting the breadth of interests within the discipline of anthropology. It is also committed to promoting debate at the interface between anthropology and areas of applied knowledge such as education, medicine, development etc. as well as that between anthropology and other academic disciplines. Anthropology Today encourages submissions on a wide range of topics, consistent with these aims. Anthropology Today is an international journal both in the scope of issues it covers and in the sources it draws from.
期刊最新文献
News Calendar Protesting the future: The evolution of the European farmer Classified ‘Skateboarding is not a sport’: Creativity at the margins of capitalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1