学生对化学学习中应用生成式预训练变压器(GPT)的看法:印度尼西亚案例研究

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0022010.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220
Ananta Ardyansyah, Agung Budhi Yuwono, Sri Rahayu*, Naif Mastoor Alsulami and Oktavia Sulistina, 
{"title":"学生对化学学习中应用生成式预训练变压器(GPT)的看法:印度尼西亚案例研究","authors":"Ananta Ardyansyah,&nbsp;Agung Budhi Yuwono,&nbsp;Sri Rahayu*,&nbsp;Naif Mastoor Alsulami and Oktavia Sulistina,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0022010.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed chatbots into generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) capable of performing various tasks. The use of GPTs is expanding to learning, including natural sciences like chemistry. GPTs can assist students in understanding and solving chemistry problems. However, there are potential negative impacts of using GPTs. This study aims to explore Indonesian university students’ perspectives on using GPTs for chemistry learning. The research used a case study method and collected data through questionnaires, interviews, and GPT usage logs, which were then analyzed thematically. The study revealed that students use GPTs in learning due to perceived usefulness, ease of use, emotional aspects, benefits, and social influence. Students appreciate GPT answers for being easy to understand, detailed, reliable, fairly accurate, fast, and helpful. However, students also recognize that GPT answers can be unreliable, difficult to understand, not always accurate, and potentially unethical. Students evaluate GPT responses by stimulating thoughts, confirming answers, integrating with other sources, directly copying responses, and paraphrasing before use. They are also aware of ethical considerations, drawbacks, and limitations associated with using GPTs. Findings pertaining to motives, constraints, and the evaluation of answer quality and its utilization can serve as indicators for the proper application of GPT in educational contexts. In many countries, including Indonesia, where there is a lack of usage regulations, concrete policies are necessary to ensure the proper integration of GPT into education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 9","pages":"3666–3675 3666–3675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ Perspectives on the Application of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in Chemistry Learning: A Case Study in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Ananta Ardyansyah,&nbsp;Agung Budhi Yuwono,&nbsp;Sri Rahayu*,&nbsp;Naif Mastoor Alsulami and Oktavia Sulistina,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0022010.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed chatbots into generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) capable of performing various tasks. The use of GPTs is expanding to learning, including natural sciences like chemistry. GPTs can assist students in understanding and solving chemistry problems. However, there are potential negative impacts of using GPTs. This study aims to explore Indonesian university students’ perspectives on using GPTs for chemistry learning. The research used a case study method and collected data through questionnaires, interviews, and GPT usage logs, which were then analyzed thematically. The study revealed that students use GPTs in learning due to perceived usefulness, ease of use, emotional aspects, benefits, and social influence. Students appreciate GPT answers for being easy to understand, detailed, reliable, fairly accurate, fast, and helpful. However, students also recognize that GPT answers can be unreliable, difficult to understand, not always accurate, and potentially unethical. Students evaluate GPT responses by stimulating thoughts, confirming answers, integrating with other sources, directly copying responses, and paraphrasing before use. They are also aware of ethical considerations, drawbacks, and limitations associated with using GPTs. Findings pertaining to motives, constraints, and the evaluation of answer quality and its utilization can serve as indicators for the proper application of GPT in educational contexts. In many countries, including Indonesia, where there is a lack of usage regulations, concrete policies are necessary to ensure the proper integration of GPT into education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"101 9\",\"pages\":\"3666–3675 3666–3675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的快速发展已将聊天机器人转变为能够执行各种任务的生成式预训练变换器(GPT)。GPT 的使用正扩展到学习领域,包括化学等自然科学。GPT 可以帮助学生理解和解决化学问题。然而,使用 GPT 可能会产生负面影响。本研究旨在探讨印度尼西亚大学生对使用 GPT 学习化学的看法。研究采用案例研究法,通过问卷调查、访谈和 GPT 使用日志收集数据,然后进行专题分析。研究结果显示,学生在学习中使用 GPT 的原因主要包括实用性、易用性、情感因素、益处和社会影响。学生赞赏 GPT 答案易懂、详细、可靠、相当准确、快速和有帮助。不过,学生也认识到 GPT 答案可能不可靠、难以理解、不一定准确,而且可能不道德。学生通过启发思考、确认答案、与其他来源整合、直接复制答案以及在使用前进行转述来评估 GPT 答案。他们还了解与使用 GPT 相关的道德考虑、缺点和限制。有关动机、限制因素、答案质量评估及其使用的研究结果,可以作为在教育环境中正确应用 GPT 的指标。在包括印度尼西亚在内的许多国家,由于缺乏使用规定,因此有必要制定具体的政策,以确保将 GPT 适当纳入教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Students’ Perspectives on the Application of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in Chemistry Learning: A Case Study in Indonesia

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed chatbots into generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) capable of performing various tasks. The use of GPTs is expanding to learning, including natural sciences like chemistry. GPTs can assist students in understanding and solving chemistry problems. However, there are potential negative impacts of using GPTs. This study aims to explore Indonesian university students’ perspectives on using GPTs for chemistry learning. The research used a case study method and collected data through questionnaires, interviews, and GPT usage logs, which were then analyzed thematically. The study revealed that students use GPTs in learning due to perceived usefulness, ease of use, emotional aspects, benefits, and social influence. Students appreciate GPT answers for being easy to understand, detailed, reliable, fairly accurate, fast, and helpful. However, students also recognize that GPT answers can be unreliable, difficult to understand, not always accurate, and potentially unethical. Students evaluate GPT responses by stimulating thoughts, confirming answers, integrating with other sources, directly copying responses, and paraphrasing before use. They are also aware of ethical considerations, drawbacks, and limitations associated with using GPTs. Findings pertaining to motives, constraints, and the evaluation of answer quality and its utilization can serve as indicators for the proper application of GPT in educational contexts. In many countries, including Indonesia, where there is a lack of usage regulations, concrete policies are necessary to ensure the proper integration of GPT into education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Education Implications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chemistry and Physics Nobel Prizes Understanding Student Help-Seeking for Contextualizing Chemistry through Curated Chatbot Data Analysis Do You Want to Make a Battery? Insights from the Development and Evaluation of a Chemistry Public Engagement Activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1