血糖控制是糖尿病患者肝细胞癌和肝脏相关死亡率的一个可改变的风险因素

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/apt.18254
Xianhua Mao, Ka-Shing Cheung, Jing-Tong Tan, Lung-Yi Mak, Chi-Ho Lee, Chi-Leung Chiang, Ho-Ming Cheng, Rex Wan-Hin Hui, Wai K. Leung, Man-Fung Yuen, Wai-Kay Seto
{"title":"血糖控制是糖尿病患者肝细胞癌和肝脏相关死亡率的一个可改变的风险因素","authors":"Xianhua Mao,&nbsp;Ka-Shing Cheung,&nbsp;Jing-Tong Tan,&nbsp;Lung-Yi Mak,&nbsp;Chi-Ho Lee,&nbsp;Chi-Leung Chiang,&nbsp;Ho-Ming Cheng,&nbsp;Rex Wan-Hin Hui,&nbsp;Wai K. Leung,&nbsp;Man-Fung Yuen,&nbsp;Wai-Kay Seto","doi":"10.1111/apt.18254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Optimal glycaemic control has well-established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver-related outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a population-based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) &lt;7% during the 3-year lead-in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver-related mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow-up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver-related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond &gt;7% (SHR 1.29–1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54–0.80), sex (SHR 0.68–0.69), BMI &lt;25 or ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SHR 0.63–0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61–0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67–0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67–0.75). A lower risk of liver-related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Glycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver-related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"60 10","pages":"1398-1408"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18254","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality in patients with diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Xianhua Mao,&nbsp;Ka-Shing Cheung,&nbsp;Jing-Tong Tan,&nbsp;Lung-Yi Mak,&nbsp;Chi-Ho Lee,&nbsp;Chi-Leung Chiang,&nbsp;Ho-Ming Cheng,&nbsp;Rex Wan-Hin Hui,&nbsp;Wai K. Leung,&nbsp;Man-Fung Yuen,&nbsp;Wai-Kay Seto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.18254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Optimal glycaemic control has well-established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver-related outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a population-based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) &lt;7% during the 3-year lead-in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver-related mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow-up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver-related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond &gt;7% (SHR 1.29–1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54–0.80), sex (SHR 0.68–0.69), BMI &lt;25 or ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SHR 0.63–0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61–0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67–0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67–0.75). A lower risk of liver-related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Glycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver-related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"1398-1408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18254\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最佳血糖控制对糖尿病(DM)患者的健康益处已得到证实。目前还不确定最佳血糖控制是否有益于肝脏相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality in patients with diabetes

Background

Optimal glycaemic control has well-established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver-related outcomes.

Aims

To examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.

Methods

In a population-based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% during the 3-year lead-in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver-related mortality.

Results

We identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow-up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver-related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond >7% (SHR 1.29–1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54–0.80), sex (SHR 0.68–0.69), BMI <25 or ≥25 kg/m2 (SHR 0.63–0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61–0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67–0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67–0.75). A lower risk of liver-related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80).

Conclusions

Glycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver-related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
P-CAB vs. PPI for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prevention in Patients With Atherothrombotic Disease on Antithrombotic Therapy: A CDM Cohort Study. Editorial: Refining the Natural History of MASLD by Imaging-Based Markers: The GOLDMINE Study. Letter: Interpreting Faecal SCFA Enrichment in IBS-D-Metabolic Signal or Transit-Related Marker? Rifaximin Improves Cognitive Performance and Reduces Cirrhosis-Related Adverse Events in Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Editorial: Bile Acids Under Bulevirtide: A Pharmacodynamic Signature, Not a Prognostic Biomarker.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1