{"title":"城市发展模式的组合能否促进碳生产力?来自中国实证分析的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote \"dual-carbon\" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the combination of urban development models promote carbon productivity? Evidence from an empirical analysis in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote \\\"dual-carbon\\\" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can the combination of urban development models promote carbon productivity? Evidence from an empirical analysis in China
The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote "dual-carbon" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;