城市发展模式的组合能否促进碳生产力?来自中国实证分析的证据

IF 10.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105802
{"title":"城市发展模式的组合能否促进碳生产力?来自中国实证分析的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote \"dual-carbon\" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the combination of urban development models promote carbon productivity? Evidence from an empirical analysis in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2024.105802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote \\\"dual-carbon\\\" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市发展模式的组合集成(CUDM)在协调经济发展与实现 "双碳 "目标方面具有举足轻重的作用。然而,现有研究往往忽视了 CUDM 在减少碳排放方面的潜力。多期 DID 模型在缓解内生性和消除遗漏变量方面表现出色。本研究采用多期 DID 模型,利用中国城市 2006-2019 年的数据,考察了创新型与智慧型城市发展模式(CISDM)的组合集成对城市碳生产率的影响。结果表明(1)CISDM 能显著提高城市碳生产率 0.2064 个单位,主要由创新引发的技术进步和结构效应驱动。(2)CISDM 对城市碳生产率产生了显著的协同效应。与单一试点城市相比,CISDM 使城市碳生产率显著提高了 0.1854 个单位。当 "智能 "措施优先于创新措施时,这种效果尤为明显。(3) CISDM 对碳生产率的影响因城市特征而异。环境法规扩大了 CISDM 的积极影响,而资源型城市则难以有效利用 CISDM。本研究强调了利用 CUDM 促进 "双碳 "目标的潜力,为政策协同提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can the combination of urban development models promote carbon productivity? Evidence from an empirical analysis in China

The combination integration of urban development models (CUDM) emerges as pivotal in aligning economic development with achieving the “dual-carbon” goals. However, existing studies often overlook CUDM's potential for carbon emissions reduction. Multi-period DID models exhibit excellent performance in mitigating endogeneity and eliminating omitted variables. This study examines the impact of the combination integration of innovative and smart city development models (CISDM) on urban carbon productivity, employing a multi-period DID model with data spanning 2006–2019 from Chinese cities. The results indicate that: (1) CISDM significantly enhances urban carbon productivity by 0.2064 units, primarily driven by innovation-induced technological advancements and structural effects. (2) CISDM yields a significant synergistic effect on urban carbon productivity. Compared to single pilot cities, CISDM significantly increases a city's carbon productivity by 0.1854 units. This effect is particularly noticeable when prioritizing “smart” initiatives over innovation. (3) The effect of the CISDM on carbon productivity varies according to city characteristics. While environmental regulations amplify CISDM's positive impact, resource-based cities struggle to harness its effective. This study underscores the potential of leveraging CUDM to promote "dual-carbon" objectives, providing valuable insights for policy synergies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
How sustainable is electric vehicle adoption? Insights from a PRISMA review A tri-level hybrid stochastic-IGDT dynamic planning model for resilience enhancement of community-integrated energy systems Non-locality and spillover effects of residential flood damage on community recovery: Insights from high-resolution flood claim and mobility data Enhanced modeling of vehicle-induced turbulence and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyon: Large-eddy simulation via dynamic overset mesh approach Dynamic integrated simulation of carbon emission reduction potential in China's building sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1