"太远了......":对澳大利亚农村妇女获得围产期保健的障碍和促进因素的定性探索。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101809
{"title":"\"太远了......\":对澳大利亚农村妇女获得围产期保健的障碍和促进因素的定性探索。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rural women and their babies experience poorer perinatal outcomes than their urban counterparts and this inequity has existed for decades. This study explored the barriers and enablers that exist for rural women in Australia in accessing perinatal care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive design, using reflexive thematic analysis, was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2023 with women who had recently given birth in rural Victoria, Australia (n=19). A purposive sampling strategy was used, recruiting women via social media platforms from rural communities across the state. The Socioecological Model (SEM) was used as a framework to organise the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants reported multilevel barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care in their own communities. Intrapersonal factors included financial resources, transportation, self-advocacy, health literacy, rural stoicism, personal agency, and cost of care. Interpersonal factors included factors such as ineffective relationships, poor communication, and care provider accessibility. Organisational factors included inequitable distribution of services, under-resourcing of perinatal services in rural areas, technology-enabled care models and access to continuity of care. Community factors included effective or ineffective interprofessional or interorganisational collaboration. Policy factors included centralisation of perinatal care, lack of funded homebirth and midwifery care pathways and access to free perinatal care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants in this study articulated several key barriers influencing access to perinatal care in rural areas. These factors impede help-seeking behaviour and engagement with care providers, compounding the impact of rurality and isolation on perinatal outcomes and experience of care. Key enablers to accessing perinatal care in rural communities were also identified and included personal agency, health literacy, social capital, effective collaboration and communication between clinicians and services, technology enabled care and free perinatal care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002695/pdfft?md5=acf0a9a006edda676d1d2e7e14ed36f7&pid=1-s2.0-S1871519224002695-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It’s just too far…”: A qualitative exploration of the barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care for rural Australian women.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rural women and their babies experience poorer perinatal outcomes than their urban counterparts and this inequity has existed for decades. This study explored the barriers and enablers that exist for rural women in Australia in accessing perinatal care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative descriptive design, using reflexive thematic analysis, was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2023 with women who had recently given birth in rural Victoria, Australia (n=19). A purposive sampling strategy was used, recruiting women via social media platforms from rural communities across the state. The Socioecological Model (SEM) was used as a framework to organise the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants reported multilevel barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care in their own communities. Intrapersonal factors included financial resources, transportation, self-advocacy, health literacy, rural stoicism, personal agency, and cost of care. Interpersonal factors included factors such as ineffective relationships, poor communication, and care provider accessibility. Organisational factors included inequitable distribution of services, under-resourcing of perinatal services in rural areas, technology-enabled care models and access to continuity of care. Community factors included effective or ineffective interprofessional or interorganisational collaboration. Policy factors included centralisation of perinatal care, lack of funded homebirth and midwifery care pathways and access to free perinatal care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants in this study articulated several key barriers influencing access to perinatal care in rural areas. These factors impede help-seeking behaviour and engagement with care providers, compounding the impact of rurality and isolation on perinatal outcomes and experience of care. Key enablers to accessing perinatal care in rural communities were also identified and included personal agency, health literacy, social capital, effective collaboration and communication between clinicians and services, technology enabled care and free perinatal care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Birth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002695/pdfft?md5=acf0a9a006edda676d1d2e7e14ed36f7&pid=1-s2.0-S1871519224002695-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Birth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002695\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的与城市妇女相比,农村妇女及其婴儿的围产期结果较差,这种不平等现象已经存在了几十年。本研究探讨了澳大利亚农村妇女在获得围产期护理方面存在的障碍和促进因素。研究采用了定性描述设计,并使用了反思性主题分析方法。2023 年,研究人员对澳大利亚维多利亚州农村地区最近分娩的妇女(n=19)进行了半结构式访谈。我们采用了有目的的抽样策略,通过社交媒体平台从全州的农村社区招募妇女。社会生态模型(SEM)被用作组织研究结果的框架。结果研究参与者报告了在其所在社区获得围产期保健的多层次障碍和促进因素。个人内部因素包括经济资源、交通、自我主张、健康知识、农村委曲求全、个人能动性和护理成本。人际因素包括人际关系不融洽、沟通不畅、医疗服务提供者的可及性等。组织因素包括服务分配不公、农村地区围产期服务资源不足、技术辅助护理模式和获得持续护理的机会。社区因素包括有效或无效的专业间或组织间合作。政策因素包括围产期保健的集中化、缺乏资助的家庭分娩和助产护理途径以及获得免费围产期保健的机会。这些因素阻碍了寻求帮助的行为和与医疗服务提供者的接触,加剧了农村地区和与世隔绝对围产期结果和护理体验的影响。农村社区获得围产期保健的主要促进因素还包括个人能力、健康知识、社会资本、临床医生和服务机构之间的有效合作与沟通、技术辅助保健和免费围产期保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“It’s just too far…”: A qualitative exploration of the barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care for rural Australian women.

Purpose

Rural women and their babies experience poorer perinatal outcomes than their urban counterparts and this inequity has existed for decades. This study explored the barriers and enablers that exist for rural women in Australia in accessing perinatal care.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive design, using reflexive thematic analysis, was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2023 with women who had recently given birth in rural Victoria, Australia (n=19). A purposive sampling strategy was used, recruiting women via social media platforms from rural communities across the state. The Socioecological Model (SEM) was used as a framework to organise the findings.

Results

Study participants reported multilevel barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care in their own communities. Intrapersonal factors included financial resources, transportation, self-advocacy, health literacy, rural stoicism, personal agency, and cost of care. Interpersonal factors included factors such as ineffective relationships, poor communication, and care provider accessibility. Organisational factors included inequitable distribution of services, under-resourcing of perinatal services in rural areas, technology-enabled care models and access to continuity of care. Community factors included effective or ineffective interprofessional or interorganisational collaboration. Policy factors included centralisation of perinatal care, lack of funded homebirth and midwifery care pathways and access to free perinatal care.

Conclusion

Participants in this study articulated several key barriers influencing access to perinatal care in rural areas. These factors impede help-seeking behaviour and engagement with care providers, compounding the impact of rurality and isolation on perinatal outcomes and experience of care. Key enablers to accessing perinatal care in rural communities were also identified and included personal agency, health literacy, social capital, effective collaboration and communication between clinicians and services, technology enabled care and free perinatal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
The acceptability of implementation of group B Streptococcus testing: Perspectives from women and health professionals in the GBS3 trial: A qualitative study Women and midwives’ experiences of an audio-visual enhanced hospital birth environment: An interview study “Where’s my baby?” A feminist phenomenological study of women experiencing preventable separation from their baby at caesarean birth The neurodivergent perinatal experience — A systematic literature review on autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Pandemic-related prenatal maternal stress, model of maternity care and postpartum mental health: The Australian BITTOC study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1