寄生虫的生物防治:鲑鱼养殖中清洁鱼的功效

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108359
Ruth Beatriz Mezzalira Pincinato , Atle Oglend , Martin D. Smith , Frank Asche
{"title":"寄生虫的生物防治:鲑鱼养殖中清洁鱼的功效","authors":"Ruth Beatriz Mezzalira Pincinato ,&nbsp;Atle Oglend ,&nbsp;Martin D. Smith ,&nbsp;Frank Asche","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Managing pathogens is a challenge in biological production processes. To manage private risks and reduce externalities, biological controls leverage the technology of natural ecosystems and are often considered environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical controls. In salmon farming, parasitic sea lice reduce own-firm profitability by stressing fish and slowing growth and generate externalities by spreading to neighboring farms and threatening wild fish populations. Cleaner fish are a form of biological control based on ecological interaction that can be used instead of chemical control of sea lice, but little is known about their efficacy and value in commercial use. We estimate efficacy of cleaner fish using facility-level data. To identify exogenous variation in cleaner fish usage, we instrument site-level cleaner fish stocks using distance to cleaner fish farm with a commercial license. Cleaner fish use significantly reduces likelihood of sea lice levels exceeding regulatory threshold levels. Combining efficacy estimates with cost data and a structural model, we provide estimates of cost-effectiveness. Our results show that cleaner fish are privately cost-effective, which is consistent with high levels of adoption. However, cost-effectiveness also suggests that policy could encourage even more adoption of biological controls to reduce externalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 108359"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002568/pdfft?md5=8dcc7ea868316c2930c90c8d5e00fc44&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924002568-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological control of a parasite: The efficacy of cleaner fish in salmon farming\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Beatriz Mezzalira Pincinato ,&nbsp;Atle Oglend ,&nbsp;Martin D. Smith ,&nbsp;Frank Asche\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Managing pathogens is a challenge in biological production processes. To manage private risks and reduce externalities, biological controls leverage the technology of natural ecosystems and are often considered environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical controls. In salmon farming, parasitic sea lice reduce own-firm profitability by stressing fish and slowing growth and generate externalities by spreading to neighboring farms and threatening wild fish populations. Cleaner fish are a form of biological control based on ecological interaction that can be used instead of chemical control of sea lice, but little is known about their efficacy and value in commercial use. We estimate efficacy of cleaner fish using facility-level data. To identify exogenous variation in cleaner fish usage, we instrument site-level cleaner fish stocks using distance to cleaner fish farm with a commercial license. Cleaner fish use significantly reduces likelihood of sea lice levels exceeding regulatory threshold levels. Combining efficacy estimates with cost data and a structural model, we provide estimates of cost-effectiveness. Our results show that cleaner fish are privately cost-effective, which is consistent with high levels of adoption. However, cost-effectiveness also suggests that policy could encourage even more adoption of biological controls to reduce externalities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002568/pdfft?md5=8dcc7ea868316c2930c90c8d5e00fc44&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924002568-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理病原体是生物生产过程中的一项挑战。为了管理私人风险和减少外部效应,生物控制利用了自然生态系统的技术,通常被认为是化学控制的环保型替代品。在鲑鱼养殖中,寄生海虱会使鱼类紧张,生长速度减慢,从而降低企业自身的盈利能力;寄生海虱还会传播到邻近的养殖场,威胁野生鱼类种群,从而产生外部效应。清洁鱼是一种基于生态互动的生物防治方式,可用于替代化学防治海虱,但人们对其功效和商业应用价值知之甚少。我们利用设施层面的数据来估算清洁鱼的功效。为了确定清洁鱼使用的外生变化,我们利用与有商业许可证的清洁鱼养殖场的距离来衡量设施层面的清洁鱼存量。清洁鱼的使用大大降低了海虱水平超过监管阈值的可能性。将功效估计值与成本数据和结构模型相结合,我们提供了成本效益估计值。我们的结果表明,清洁鱼在私人领域具有成本效益,这与高采用率是一致的。不过,成本效益也表明,政策可以鼓励更多地采用生物控制措施来减少外部效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biological control of a parasite: The efficacy of cleaner fish in salmon farming

Managing pathogens is a challenge in biological production processes. To manage private risks and reduce externalities, biological controls leverage the technology of natural ecosystems and are often considered environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical controls. In salmon farming, parasitic sea lice reduce own-firm profitability by stressing fish and slowing growth and generate externalities by spreading to neighboring farms and threatening wild fish populations. Cleaner fish are a form of biological control based on ecological interaction that can be used instead of chemical control of sea lice, but little is known about their efficacy and value in commercial use. We estimate efficacy of cleaner fish using facility-level data. To identify exogenous variation in cleaner fish usage, we instrument site-level cleaner fish stocks using distance to cleaner fish farm with a commercial license. Cleaner fish use significantly reduces likelihood of sea lice levels exceeding regulatory threshold levels. Combining efficacy estimates with cost data and a structural model, we provide estimates of cost-effectiveness. Our results show that cleaner fish are privately cost-effective, which is consistent with high levels of adoption. However, cost-effectiveness also suggests that policy could encourage even more adoption of biological controls to reduce externalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Effect simulation and local adaptation of multi-agent collaborative governance in marine eco-economic systems: Evidence from China Carbon Giants: Exploring the Top 100 Industrial CO2 Emitters in the EU Public support for degrowth policies and sufficiency behaviours in the United States: A discrete choice experiment Social comparison nudges: What actually happens when we are told what others do? Breaking the bag habit: Testing interventions to reduce plastic bag demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1