鲁卡帕利对复发性高级别卵巢癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2024.05.020
{"title":"鲁卡帕利对复发性高级别卵巢癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221–0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49449,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001670/pdfft?md5=b0f48a9228d4ad22ccf40dcef71bfd28&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001670-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.05.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221–0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001670/pdfft?md5=b0f48a9228d4ad22ccf40dcef71bfd28&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001670-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢癌是发病率排名第三的妇科恶性肿瘤。PARP 抑制剂(尤其是 Rucaparib)的出现彻底改变了晚期卵巢癌的治疗格局,尤其是对于以前未接触过 PARP 抑制剂的患者,其疗效显著,毒性极低。Rucaparib 采用精准驱动的方法,以特定基因突变为靶点,破坏 DNA 修复机制,从而对肿瘤细胞产生细胞毒性作用。本综述深入探讨了鲁卡帕利对复发性卵巢癌的临床疗效和安全性,展示了其前景广阔的治疗方法。本综述对截至 2023 年 9 月报告 rucaparib 疗效和安全性的研究进行了系统检索,检索范围包括各种知名数据库和资料来源。对7篇文章进行的荟萃分析表明,汇总的客观反应率(ORR)为0.331(95% CI,0.221-0.449;I2 = 92.4%),突显了鲁卡帕利的疗效,尤其是在BRCA突变队列中。在无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)方面,Rucaparib的表现始终优于对照组。安全性评估显示,98.7%的患者出现了治疗突发不良事件(TEAE),其中61%为≥3级。值得注意的 TEAE 包括恶心(69.0%)、疲劳(66.8%)、呕吐(37.3%)和便秘(32.1%)。血液学问题包括贫血(47.9%)、血小板减少、谷草转氨酶/谷丙转氨酶升高(37.3%)和血清肌酐水平升高(19.7%)。尽管结果良好,但与对照组相比,rucaparib组在各种指标上的事件发生率较高。研究结果表明,有必要进行细致的监测和剂量调整,以优化治疗效果,降低不良事件带来的更大风险。国际前瞻性系统综述注册标识符:CRD42023459646。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221–0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
23.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is a peer-reviewed journal and open access publishing editorials, reviews, original articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, correspondence and letters to the editor in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The aims of the journal are to: 1.Publish cutting-edge, innovative and topical research that addresses screening, diagnosis, management and care in women''s health 2.Deliver evidence-based information 3.Promote the sharing of clinical experience 4.Address women-related health promotion The journal provides comprehensive coverage of topics in obstetrics & gynecology and women''s health including maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology/infertility, and gynecologic oncology. Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Instructions to Authors Common on “craniorachischisis in a stillbirth associated with maternal smoking” Comment on “Loeys-Dietz syndrome with a novel in-frame SMAD3 deletion diagnosed as a result of postpartum aortic dissection” Reply to “the role of probiotics in women's health: An update narrative review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1