医学学术图书馆中的微信官方账号:中国医学学术图书馆微信官方账号的发布状况与传播影响力研究

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102946
{"title":"医学学术图书馆中的微信官方账号:中国医学学术图书馆微信官方账号的发布状况与传播影响力研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>WeChat official accounts (WCOAs) have emerged as a prevalent medium for information dissemination in Chinese academic libraries over the past decade. This study quantitatively analyzed the whole-year performance of 120 WCOAs from 117 medical college and university libraries, using the WeChat communication index (WCI) algorithm to evaluate communication power at three levels: macro-level accounts, meso-level content themes, and micro-level individual posts. The results showed that 55.6 % of the libraries have activated WCOAs, with an average annual output of 129 posts and 72 broadcasts per account. However, these accounts demonstrated a relatively low average WCI of 249.24, with a small percentage of high-impact posts. A deeper analysis reveals that reading promotion was the overarching theme, and basic library services and digital resource services were frequently highlighted with a high topic communication index. Notable concerns were also identified, including non-audience-centric posting schedules, a disproportionate focus on leisure-oriented content rather than academic support, and a scarcity of original posts. This study provides a snapshot of the developmental stages of WCOAs in Chinese academic libraries from a publication and communication perspective, and also offers pragmatic guidance for their development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WeChat official accounts in medical academic libraries: A study on publication status and communication impact in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>WeChat official accounts (WCOAs) have emerged as a prevalent medium for information dissemination in Chinese academic libraries over the past decade. This study quantitatively analyzed the whole-year performance of 120 WCOAs from 117 medical college and university libraries, using the WeChat communication index (WCI) algorithm to evaluate communication power at three levels: macro-level accounts, meso-level content themes, and micro-level individual posts. The results showed that 55.6 % of the libraries have activated WCOAs, with an average annual output of 129 posts and 72 broadcasts per account. However, these accounts demonstrated a relatively low average WCI of 249.24, with a small percentage of high-impact posts. A deeper analysis reveals that reading promotion was the overarching theme, and basic library services and digital resource services were frequently highlighted with a high topic communication index. Notable concerns were also identified, including non-audience-centric posting schedules, a disproportionate focus on leisure-oriented content rather than academic support, and a scarcity of original posts. This study provides a snapshot of the developmental stages of WCOAs in Chinese academic libraries from a publication and communication perspective, and also offers pragmatic guidance for their development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近十年来,微信官方账号(WCOA)已成为中国学术图书馆信息传播的重要媒介。本研究采用微信传播指数(WCI)算法,从宏观层面的账号、中观层面的内容主题和微观层面的个人文章三个层面对117所医药院校图书馆的120个微信官方账号的全年表现进行了定量分析。结果显示,55.6% 的图书馆已激活微信公众账号,每个账号平均每年发布 129 篇文章和 72 次广播。然而,这些账户的平均 WCI(249.24)相对较低,高影响力帖子所占比例较小。更深入的分析显示,阅读推广是首要主题,图书馆基本服务和数字资源服务也经常得到强调,主题传播指数较高。同时也发现了一些值得关注的问题,包括不以受众为中心的发帖时间安排、过度关注休闲内容而非学术支持,以及原创帖子的稀缺。本研究从出版和传播的角度对中国学术图书馆 WCOA 的发展阶段进行了概括,并为其发展提供了务实的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WeChat official accounts in medical academic libraries: A study on publication status and communication impact in China

WeChat official accounts (WCOAs) have emerged as a prevalent medium for information dissemination in Chinese academic libraries over the past decade. This study quantitatively analyzed the whole-year performance of 120 WCOAs from 117 medical college and university libraries, using the WeChat communication index (WCI) algorithm to evaluate communication power at three levels: macro-level accounts, meso-level content themes, and micro-level individual posts. The results showed that 55.6 % of the libraries have activated WCOAs, with an average annual output of 129 posts and 72 broadcasts per account. However, these accounts demonstrated a relatively low average WCI of 249.24, with a small percentage of high-impact posts. A deeper analysis reveals that reading promotion was the overarching theme, and basic library services and digital resource services were frequently highlighted with a high topic communication index. Notable concerns were also identified, including non-audience-centric posting schedules, a disproportionate focus on leisure-oriented content rather than academic support, and a scarcity of original posts. This study provides a snapshot of the developmental stages of WCOAs in Chinese academic libraries from a publication and communication perspective, and also offers pragmatic guidance for their development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Promoting citizen science through academic libraries in the US: A study on LibGuides Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journey Artificial intelligence implementation strategies for Ghanaian academic libraries: A scoping review Disability policies to guide the provision of facilities, services and resources to students with disabilities: The case of ten Ghanaian academic libraries Environmental scan of equity, diversity, and inclusion practices in collection development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1