双极刺激的常见参数对大脑诱发电位的影响

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.08.019
{"title":"双极刺激的常见参数对大脑诱发电位的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify optimal bipolar stimulation parameters for robust generation of brain evoked potentials (BEPs), namely the interelectrode distance (IED) and the intensity of stimulation (IS), in cortical and axonal stimulation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 15 patients who underwent awake surgery for brain tumor removal, BEPs were elicited at different values of IED and IS, respectively: 5 mm-5 mA, 5 mm-10 mA, and 10 mm-10 mA. The number of BEPs elicited by stimulation, as well as the delays and amplitudes of the N1 waves were compared between the different groups of stimulation parameters and according to the stimulated brain structure (cortical vs. axonal).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The amplitudes of N1 increased with the intensity of bipolar stimulation, either in cortical or axonal stimulation, while N1 peak delays were not affected by the stimulation parameters. Furthermore, axonal stimulation produced more N1s than cortical stimulation, with lower latencies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Understanding the relationship between stimulation parameters and BEP is of utmost importance to determine whether the generated N1 waves accurately reflect the underlying structural anatomy. Other factors, such as stimulation frequency or pulse width and shape, may also play a role and warrant further investigation.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study represents the first step in describing the influence of common bipolar stimulation parameters on robustness of BEPs by examining the impact of IED and IS on the N1 wave.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002451/pdfft?md5=ee1cef51462379723b6bbfbeb24b8e02&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724002451-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of common parameters of bipolar stimulation on brain evoked potentials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify optimal bipolar stimulation parameters for robust generation of brain evoked potentials (BEPs), namely the interelectrode distance (IED) and the intensity of stimulation (IS), in cortical and axonal stimulation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 15 patients who underwent awake surgery for brain tumor removal, BEPs were elicited at different values of IED and IS, respectively: 5 mm-5 mA, 5 mm-10 mA, and 10 mm-10 mA. The number of BEPs elicited by stimulation, as well as the delays and amplitudes of the N1 waves were compared between the different groups of stimulation parameters and according to the stimulated brain structure (cortical vs. axonal).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The amplitudes of N1 increased with the intensity of bipolar stimulation, either in cortical or axonal stimulation, while N1 peak delays were not affected by the stimulation parameters. Furthermore, axonal stimulation produced more N1s than cortical stimulation, with lower latencies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Understanding the relationship between stimulation parameters and BEP is of utmost importance to determine whether the generated N1 waves accurately reflect the underlying structural anatomy. Other factors, such as stimulation frequency or pulse width and shape, may also play a role and warrant further investigation.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study represents the first step in describing the influence of common bipolar stimulation parameters on robustness of BEPs by examining the impact of IED and IS on the N1 wave.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002451/pdfft?md5=ee1cef51462379723b6bbfbeb24b8e02&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724002451-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002451\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定在皮层和轴突刺激中产生脑诱发电位(BEPs)的最佳双极刺激参数,即电极间距(IED)和刺激强度(IS)。方法在 15 名接受脑肿瘤切除清醒手术的患者中,分别以不同的 IED 和 IS 值诱发 BEPs:5 mm-5 mA、5 mm-10 mA 和 10 mm-10 mA。结果无论是皮层刺激还是轴突刺激,N1 波的振幅都随着双极刺激强度的增加而增加,而 N1 波峰值延迟不受刺激参数的影响。结论了解刺激参数与 BEP 之间的关系对于确定所产生的 N1 波是否准确反映了潜在的结构解剖学至关重要。本研究通过考察 IED 和 IS 对 N1 波的影响,迈出了描述常见双极刺激参数对 BEP 稳健性影响的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of common parameters of bipolar stimulation on brain evoked potentials

Objective

To identify optimal bipolar stimulation parameters for robust generation of brain evoked potentials (BEPs), namely the interelectrode distance (IED) and the intensity of stimulation (IS), in cortical and axonal stimulation.

Methods

In 15 patients who underwent awake surgery for brain tumor removal, BEPs were elicited at different values of IED and IS, respectively: 5 mm-5 mA, 5 mm-10 mA, and 10 mm-10 mA. The number of BEPs elicited by stimulation, as well as the delays and amplitudes of the N1 waves were compared between the different groups of stimulation parameters and according to the stimulated brain structure (cortical vs. axonal).

Results

The amplitudes of N1 increased with the intensity of bipolar stimulation, either in cortical or axonal stimulation, while N1 peak delays were not affected by the stimulation parameters. Furthermore, axonal stimulation produced more N1s than cortical stimulation, with lower latencies.

Conclusions

Understanding the relationship between stimulation parameters and BEP is of utmost importance to determine whether the generated N1 waves accurately reflect the underlying structural anatomy. Other factors, such as stimulation frequency or pulse width and shape, may also play a role and warrant further investigation.

Significance

This study represents the first step in describing the influence of common bipolar stimulation parameters on robustness of BEPs by examining the impact of IED and IS on the N1 wave.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Infant sleep spindle measures from EEG improve prediction of cerebral palsy Insights into EEG dynamics and network changes preceding dream enactment behaviors in REM sleep behavior disorder The effect of common parameters of bipolar stimulation on brain evoked potentials Determining predictive value of intraoperative electroencephalography changes for delirium development after cardiovascular surgeries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1