生鲜食品零售商何时应该接受接近过期的食品商业化?

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104081
Zhengwei Lyu , Hongjie Lan , Samuel Shuai Liu , Guowei Hua , T.C.E. Cheng
{"title":"生鲜食品零售商何时应该接受接近过期的食品商业化?","authors":"Zhengwei Lyu ,&nbsp;Hongjie Lan ,&nbsp;Samuel Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Guowei Hua ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the potential of near-expired food commercialization (NFC) to recover value from unsold food, skepticism persists due to concern about its impact on fresh food margins. This study introduces a game-theoretic model to explore the optimal strategy and price-setting timing for the fresh-food retailer considering NFC. We find that the optimal strategy transitions from no NFC to partial and then to full NFC as the order quantity increases. Specifically, under full NFC, the fresh-food retailer with strong bargaining power and high perceived quality benefits from adopting <em>clearance-priority pricing</em>, which prioritizes the pricing of the near-expired food. Conversely, the retailer with limited power and lower perceived quality prefers <em>fresh-priority pricing</em>, which sets the retail price of fresh food first. Under partial NFC, while <em>clearance-priority pricing</em> generally yields profits, the high disposal cost may compel even powerful fresh-food retailers to switch to <em>fresh-priority pricing</em> to mitigate the risks associated with negotiation failures. We further analyze extended models to confirm the robustness of our findings. Our research contributes to the literature and guides practice by addressing common misconceptions about NFC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104081"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When should the fresh-food retailer embrace near-expired food commercialization?\",\"authors\":\"Zhengwei Lyu ,&nbsp;Hongjie Lan ,&nbsp;Samuel Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Guowei Hua ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the potential of near-expired food commercialization (NFC) to recover value from unsold food, skepticism persists due to concern about its impact on fresh food margins. This study introduces a game-theoretic model to explore the optimal strategy and price-setting timing for the fresh-food retailer considering NFC. We find that the optimal strategy transitions from no NFC to partial and then to full NFC as the order quantity increases. Specifically, under full NFC, the fresh-food retailer with strong bargaining power and high perceived quality benefits from adopting <em>clearance-priority pricing</em>, which prioritizes the pricing of the near-expired food. Conversely, the retailer with limited power and lower perceived quality prefers <em>fresh-priority pricing</em>, which sets the retail price of fresh food first. Under partial NFC, while <em>clearance-priority pricing</em> generally yields profits, the high disposal cost may compel even powerful fresh-food retailers to switch to <em>fresh-priority pricing</em> to mitigate the risks associated with negotiation failures. We further analyze extended models to confirm the robustness of our findings. Our research contributes to the literature and guides practice by addressing common misconceptions about NFC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003771\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管临近过期食品商业化(NFC)具有从未售食品中回收价值的潜力,但由于担心其对生鲜食品利润的影响,人们对其仍持怀疑态度。本研究引入了一个博弈论模型来探讨生鲜食品零售商考虑 NFC 的最佳策略和定价时机。我们发现,随着订单量的增加,最优策略会从无 NFC 过渡到部分 NFC,再到完全 NFC。具体来说,在完全 NFC 的情况下,议价能力强、感知质量高的生鲜食品零售商会从清仓优先定价中获益,因为清仓优先定价会优先考虑临近过期的食品。相反,议价能力有限且感知质量较低的零售商则倾向于采用新鲜优先定价法,即首先确定新鲜食品的零售价格。在部分 NFC 条件下,虽然清仓优先定价通常会带来利润,但高昂的处置成本可能会迫使实力雄厚的生鲜食品零售商转而采用生鲜优先定价,以降低谈判失败带来的风险。我们进一步分析了扩展模型,以证实我们研究结果的稳健性。我们的研究解决了人们对 NFC 的常见误解,从而为相关文献做出了贡献,并为实践提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When should the fresh-food retailer embrace near-expired food commercialization?

Despite the potential of near-expired food commercialization (NFC) to recover value from unsold food, skepticism persists due to concern about its impact on fresh food margins. This study introduces a game-theoretic model to explore the optimal strategy and price-setting timing for the fresh-food retailer considering NFC. We find that the optimal strategy transitions from no NFC to partial and then to full NFC as the order quantity increases. Specifically, under full NFC, the fresh-food retailer with strong bargaining power and high perceived quality benefits from adopting clearance-priority pricing, which prioritizes the pricing of the near-expired food. Conversely, the retailer with limited power and lower perceived quality prefers fresh-priority pricing, which sets the retail price of fresh food first. Under partial NFC, while clearance-priority pricing generally yields profits, the high disposal cost may compel even powerful fresh-food retailers to switch to fresh-priority pricing to mitigate the risks associated with negotiation failures. We further analyze extended models to confirm the robustness of our findings. Our research contributes to the literature and guides practice by addressing common misconceptions about NFC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1