基于两个应变片的正交复合材料 I 模式应力强度因子测定技术研究

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104653
{"title":"基于两个应变片的正交复合材料 I 模式应力强度因子测定技术研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work, we have examined the single strain gage technique proposed by Chakraborty et al. (2014) (CMC1) for the accurate determination of mode I stress intensity factor (SIF) in orthotropic composite materials. Numerical simulations carried out on single edge crack specimen with different values of the height to width ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>h</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>b</mi></mrow></math></span>) and of the crack length to width ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>b</mi></mrow></math></span>) have shown the limits of this technique and that the use of a single strain gage is not always reliable to provide precise measurements of SIF, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. To avoid such a situation, we have proposed two new techniques based on two strain gages named CMC2 and M_CMC2. The CMC2 technique is a natural extension of the CMC1 technique and the M_CMC2 technique is a modification of the CMC2 technique. Accordingly, general finite element approaches are developed to estimate the extent of the valid region of these two techniques. The results of the numerical simulations show that the two techniques CMC2 and the M_CMC2 can give a very accurate value of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> when the two strain gages are placed within valid region. Also, these results show that these two techniques provide good solutions to ensure an accurate measurement of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> when the technique of CMC1 fails to provide the desired precision and accuracy of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. In addition, the results derived from experimental data (Chakraborty et al., 2017) proved the effectiveness of the CMC2 technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22879,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An examination of techniques based on two strain gages for the determination of mode I stress intensity factor in orthotropic composite materials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this work, we have examined the single strain gage technique proposed by Chakraborty et al. (2014) (CMC1) for the accurate determination of mode I stress intensity factor (SIF) in orthotropic composite materials. Numerical simulations carried out on single edge crack specimen with different values of the height to width ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>h</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>b</mi></mrow></math></span>) and of the crack length to width ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>b</mi></mrow></math></span>) have shown the limits of this technique and that the use of a single strain gage is not always reliable to provide precise measurements of SIF, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. To avoid such a situation, we have proposed two new techniques based on two strain gages named CMC2 and M_CMC2. The CMC2 technique is a natural extension of the CMC1 technique and the M_CMC2 technique is a modification of the CMC2 technique. Accordingly, general finite element approaches are developed to estimate the extent of the valid region of these two techniques. The results of the numerical simulations show that the two techniques CMC2 and the M_CMC2 can give a very accurate value of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> when the two strain gages are placed within valid region. Also, these results show that these two techniques provide good solutions to ensure an accurate measurement of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> when the technique of CMC1 fails to provide the desired precision and accuracy of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>I</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. In addition, the results derived from experimental data (Chakraborty et al., 2017) proved the effectiveness of the CMC2 technique.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224004038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224004038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们对 Chakraborty 等人(2014 年)提出的单应变片技术(CMC1)进行了研究,以准确确定各向同性复合材料的模式 I 应力强度因子(SIF)。在具有不同高宽比 (h/b) 值和裂缝长宽比 (a/b) 值的单边裂缝试样上进行的数值模拟显示了该技术的局限性,而且使用单个应变片提供 SIF、KI 的精确测量并不总是可靠的。为了避免这种情况,我们提出了两种基于两个应变片的新技术,分别命名为 CMC2 和 M_CMC2。CMC2 技术是 CMC1 技术的自然延伸,而 M_CMC2 技术则是对 CMC2 技术的改进。因此,开发了通用有限元方法来估算这两种技术的有效区域范围。数值模拟结果表明,当两个应变片放置在有效区域内时,CMC2 和 M_CMC2 这两种技术可以给出非常精确的 KI 值。这些结果还表明,当 CMC1 技术无法提供所需的 KI 精确度和准确度时,这两种技术可提供良好的解决方案,确保精确测量 KI。此外,实验数据得出的结果(Chakraborty 等人,2017 年)也证明了 CMC2 技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An examination of techniques based on two strain gages for the determination of mode I stress intensity factor in orthotropic composite materials

In this work, we have examined the single strain gage technique proposed by Chakraborty et al. (2014) (CMC1) for the accurate determination of mode I stress intensity factor (SIF) in orthotropic composite materials. Numerical simulations carried out on single edge crack specimen with different values of the height to width ratio (h/b) and of the crack length to width ratio (a/b) have shown the limits of this technique and that the use of a single strain gage is not always reliable to provide precise measurements of SIF, KI. To avoid such a situation, we have proposed two new techniques based on two strain gages named CMC2 and M_CMC2. The CMC2 technique is a natural extension of the CMC1 technique and the M_CMC2 technique is a modification of the CMC2 technique. Accordingly, general finite element approaches are developed to estimate the extent of the valid region of these two techniques. The results of the numerical simulations show that the two techniques CMC2 and the M_CMC2 can give a very accurate value of KI when the two strain gages are placed within valid region. Also, these results show that these two techniques provide good solutions to ensure an accurate measurement of KI when the technique of CMC1 fails to provide the desired precision and accuracy of KI. In addition, the results derived from experimental data (Chakraborty et al., 2017) proved the effectiveness of the CMC2 technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
435
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics'' aims & scopes have been re-designed to cover both the theoretical, applied, and numerical aspects associated with those cracking related phenomena taking place, at a micro-, meso-, and macroscopic level, in materials/components/structures of any kind. The journal aims to cover the cracking/mechanical behaviour of materials/components/structures in those situations involving both time-independent and time-dependent system of external forces/moments (such as, for instance, quasi-static, impulsive, impact, blasting, creep, contact, and fatigue loading). Since, under the above circumstances, the mechanical behaviour of cracked materials/components/structures is also affected by the environmental conditions, the journal would consider also those theoretical/experimental research works investigating the effect of external variables such as, for instance, the effect of corrosive environments as well as of high/low-temperature.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing waste for sustainable construction: A novel synthesizing activators from waste for one-part geopolymer concrete and evaluating its fracture toughness Fracture assessment of blunt V-notched 3D-printed ABS: Proposing a new specimen for testing and different criteria for prediction Analysis of tooth root three-dimensional fatigue crack initiation, propagation, and fatigue life for spur gear transmission Measurement of fracture toughness in high-strength alloys via modified limit load analysis using flat-end cylindrical indenter Lignin fiber reinforced gypsum-cement composite materials: Investigation of fracture properties and freeze–thaw behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1