创意市场:多样性、社会资本与创新

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1007/s11747-024-01045-6
Andreas H. Heusler, Natasha Z. Foutz, Martin Spann, Lucas Stich
{"title":"创意市场:多样性、社会资本与创新","authors":"Andreas H. Heusler, Natasha Z. Foutz, Martin Spann, Lucas Stich","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01045-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Firms increasingly leverage idea markets, where participants (such as employees) generate, improve, and evaluate ideas on a collaborative digital platform. Different participants contribute differently to the ideation process, some generating high quality ideas while others initiating discussion threads and commenting on the ideas to further enhance the ideas’ quality. Such diverse contributions may be importantly influenced by the participants’ diverse social capital—<i>resource access</i> and <i>status</i>—in their pre-existing network. We theorize this relationship and further test our hypotheses by conducting two idea market studies, one involving only a firm’s employees (Study 1: closed innovation) and the other further incorporating non-employees (Study 2: open innovation). We show that the <i>higher quality ideas</i> are generated by the participants with greater <i>resource access</i>, whereas <i>continued engagement</i>, including contributing larger quantities of ideas, discussion threads, and comments, stems from those with higher <i>status</i>. These findings have important implications for ideator recruitment and idea market design.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The idea marketplace: Diversity, social capital, and innovation\",\"authors\":\"Andreas H. Heusler, Natasha Z. Foutz, Martin Spann, Lucas Stich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-024-01045-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Firms increasingly leverage idea markets, where participants (such as employees) generate, improve, and evaluate ideas on a collaborative digital platform. Different participants contribute differently to the ideation process, some generating high quality ideas while others initiating discussion threads and commenting on the ideas to further enhance the ideas’ quality. Such diverse contributions may be importantly influenced by the participants’ diverse social capital—<i>resource access</i> and <i>status</i>—in their pre-existing network. We theorize this relationship and further test our hypotheses by conducting two idea market studies, one involving only a firm’s employees (Study 1: closed innovation) and the other further incorporating non-employees (Study 2: open innovation). We show that the <i>higher quality ideas</i> are generated by the participants with greater <i>resource access</i>, whereas <i>continued engagement</i>, including contributing larger quantities of ideas, discussion threads, and comments, stems from those with higher <i>status</i>. These findings have important implications for ideator recruitment and idea market design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01045-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01045-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业越来越多地利用创意市场,让参与者(如员工)在协作式数字平台上产生、改进和评估创意。不同的参与者在构思过程中做出不同的贡献,有些人提出高质量的构思,有些人则发起讨论线程并对构思进行评论,以进一步提高构思的质量。这种不同的贡献可能会受到参与者不同的社会资本--资源获取能力和在已有网络中的地位--的重要影响。我们对这种关系进行了理论分析,并通过两项创意市场研究进一步验证了我们的假设,一项研究只涉及公司员工(研究 1:封闭式创新),另一项研究则进一步纳入了非员工(研究 2:开放式创新)。我们发现,拥有更多资源的参与者会产生更高质量的想法,而地位较高的参与者则会持续参与,包括贡献更多的想法、讨论主题和评论。这些发现对创意者招募和创意市场设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The idea marketplace: Diversity, social capital, and innovation

Firms increasingly leverage idea markets, where participants (such as employees) generate, improve, and evaluate ideas on a collaborative digital platform. Different participants contribute differently to the ideation process, some generating high quality ideas while others initiating discussion threads and commenting on the ideas to further enhance the ideas’ quality. Such diverse contributions may be importantly influenced by the participants’ diverse social capital—resource access and status—in their pre-existing network. We theorize this relationship and further test our hypotheses by conducting two idea market studies, one involving only a firm’s employees (Study 1: closed innovation) and the other further incorporating non-employees (Study 2: open innovation). We show that the higher quality ideas are generated by the participants with greater resource access, whereas continued engagement, including contributing larger quantities of ideas, discussion threads, and comments, stems from those with higher status. These findings have important implications for ideator recruitment and idea market design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses The paradox of product scarcity: Catalyzing the speed of innovation diffusion Recycle right: How to decrease recycling contamination with informational point-of-disposal signage The Taguchi approach to large-scale experimental designs: A powerful and efficient tool for advancing marketing theory and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1