铁路行业的效率与市场力量

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Research in Transportation Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101477
Óscar Álvarez-SanJaime , Pedro Cantos-Sánchez , Rafael Moner-Colonques , Jose J. Sempere-Monerris
{"title":"铁路行业的效率与市场力量","authors":"Óscar Álvarez-SanJaime ,&nbsp;Pedro Cantos-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Rafael Moner-Colonques ,&nbsp;Jose J. Sempere-Monerris","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although an extensive literature exists that examines efficiency in rail markets, analyses that also study the market power of rail operators are scarce. We examine the effects of competition and vertical separation on efficiency and price-cost margins. In doing so we propose a two-stage procedure. Firstly, efficiency and Lerner indexes will be obtained for a sample of rail operators for the period 2000–2016. Secondly, the determinants of both indexes are jointly estimated. Results indicate that integrated incumbents not facing competition perform worst and exert the highest market power. Vertically separated and specialized in passenger services operators display the strongest improvements in efficiency levels, while integrated incumbents facing competition show the lowest market power indexes. Finally, more efficiency translates to smaller values of the Lerner index.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000726/pdfft?md5=87b73057839361b735555823a507b485&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885924000726-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency versus market power in the rail industry\",\"authors\":\"Óscar Álvarez-SanJaime ,&nbsp;Pedro Cantos-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Rafael Moner-Colonques ,&nbsp;Jose J. Sempere-Monerris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although an extensive literature exists that examines efficiency in rail markets, analyses that also study the market power of rail operators are scarce. We examine the effects of competition and vertical separation on efficiency and price-cost margins. In doing so we propose a two-stage procedure. Firstly, efficiency and Lerner indexes will be obtained for a sample of rail operators for the period 2000–2016. Secondly, the determinants of both indexes are jointly estimated. Results indicate that integrated incumbents not facing competition perform worst and exert the highest market power. Vertically separated and specialized in passenger services operators display the strongest improvements in efficiency levels, while integrated incumbents facing competition show the lowest market power indexes. Finally, more efficiency translates to smaller values of the Lerner index.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000726/pdfft?md5=87b73057839361b735555823a507b485&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885924000726-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管已有大量文献对铁路市场的效率进行了研究,但同时对铁路运营商的市场力量进行研究的分析却很少。我们研究了竞争和纵向分离对效率和价格成本利润率的影响。为此,我们提出了一个两阶段的程序。首先,我们将获得 2000-2016 年期间铁路运营商样本的效率和勒纳指数。其次,共同估算这两个指数的决定因素。结果表明,未面临竞争的综合型在位者表现最差,市场支配力最高。纵向分离和客运服务专业化的运营商在效率水平上的改进力度最大,而面临竞争的综合型现有运营商的市场支配力指数最低。最后,效率越高,勒纳指数值越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency versus market power in the rail industry

Although an extensive literature exists that examines efficiency in rail markets, analyses that also study the market power of rail operators are scarce. We examine the effects of competition and vertical separation on efficiency and price-cost margins. In doing so we propose a two-stage procedure. Firstly, efficiency and Lerner indexes will be obtained for a sample of rail operators for the period 2000–2016. Secondly, the determinants of both indexes are jointly estimated. Results indicate that integrated incumbents not facing competition perform worst and exert the highest market power. Vertically separated and specialized in passenger services operators display the strongest improvements in efficiency levels, while integrated incumbents facing competition show the lowest market power indexes. Finally, more efficiency translates to smaller values of the Lerner index.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
期刊最新文献
eXplainable DEA approach for evaluating performance of public transport origin-destination pairs Increased ridership and improved affordability: Transforming public transport subsidies in developing contexts Spatial participatory planning for urban logistics: A GIS-enhanced Real-Time Spatial Delphi approach A framework for analyzing service disruptions in last-mile and first-mile reverse logistics Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1