Caroline Dudish, Tori Hayes, Frederick Allen Rueggeberg, Rafael Rocha Pacheco
{"title":"使用蓝色激光二极管或蓝色发光二极管进行树脂密封剂单体转换","authors":"Caroline Dudish, Tori Hayes, Frederick Allen Rueggeberg, Rafael Rocha Pacheco","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221/pdfft?md5=d8c42ae748eb6ff31f4dd68c86ad34ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Dudish, Tori Hayes, Frederick Allen Rueggeberg, Rafael Rocha Pacheco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221/pdfft?md5=d8c42ae748eb6ff31f4dd68c86ad34ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000221-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED
OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).
METHODS
Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.
RESULTS
For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.
CONCLUSIONS
Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.
IMPLICATIONS
Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.