多中心亚专科实践中下肢搭桥术的内窥镜静脉采集术后的当代成果

{"title":"多中心亚专科实践中下肢搭桥术的内窥镜静脉采集术后的当代成果","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endoscopic vein harvesting (<em>EVH</em>) is considered the standard of care for coronary bypass procedures given the lower early morbidity from surgical wound complications. However, the use of EVH for lower extremity (<em>LE</em>) bypass remains controversial owing to concerns about decreased graft patency. In 2022, the BEST-CLI Trial (Best Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) demonstrated patients undergoing surgical bypass with adequate great saphenous vein quality experienced a lower incidence of major adverse limb events and mortality than those who underwent endovascular repair. Despite these results, wound complications from large harvest site incisions remain a significant barrier preventing surgical bypass as being the preferred initial treatment. To mitigate wound complications, our practice has adopted EVH as the standard approach for harvesting bypass conduit. Here, we report our recent 5-year experience using EVH for LE bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred sixty-eight LE bypasses with EVH were evaluated from 2017 to 2022. The cohort included 14 vascular surgeons in 8 hospitals. The primary end point was 30-day surgical wound complications. Secondary end points included bypass patency, need for major amputation, 30-day morbidity and mortality, length of operation, and length of hospitalization. Wound complications were measured using Szilagyi's method, with class I characterized by erythema necessitating antibiotics, class II having drainage or superficial dehiscence, and class III threatening graft integrity and requiring surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 168 LE bypasses with EVH were performed on 166 patients. Of these, 65.48% were male with a median age of 68.4 ± 9.7 years. There were no wound complications related to saphenectomy. Surgical site infections occurred in 22 patients (13.10%). Seven patients (4.17%) had class I complications, 12 (7.14%) had class II complications, and 3 (1.79%) had class III complications. Primary patency at 30 days was 96.10% and 86.84% at 1 year). Seven patients (4.17%) required major amputation at 30 days. The 1-year amputation-free survival was 89.39%. The 30-day postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates were 0.60%, 0.60%, and 2.38%, respectively. The median operative time was 3.30 ± 1.18 hours. The median length of hospitalization was 3.00 ± 3.56 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EVH minimizes saphenectomy wound complications without compromising patency and limb salvage rates. Older studies suggesting lower patency rates after EVH may have been limited by older technology and inexperienced operators. Whether EVH should be the standard of care for LE bypass warrants further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000801/pdfft?md5=15d8c33febd77596c70935bc6bdc05db&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000801-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary outcomes after endoscopic vein harvesting for lower extremity bypass in a multicenter subspecialty practice\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endoscopic vein harvesting (<em>EVH</em>) is considered the standard of care for coronary bypass procedures given the lower early morbidity from surgical wound complications. However, the use of EVH for lower extremity (<em>LE</em>) bypass remains controversial owing to concerns about decreased graft patency. In 2022, the BEST-CLI Trial (Best Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) demonstrated patients undergoing surgical bypass with adequate great saphenous vein quality experienced a lower incidence of major adverse limb events and mortality than those who underwent endovascular repair. Despite these results, wound complications from large harvest site incisions remain a significant barrier preventing surgical bypass as being the preferred initial treatment. To mitigate wound complications, our practice has adopted EVH as the standard approach for harvesting bypass conduit. Here, we report our recent 5-year experience using EVH for LE bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred sixty-eight LE bypasses with EVH were evaluated from 2017 to 2022. The cohort included 14 vascular surgeons in 8 hospitals. The primary end point was 30-day surgical wound complications. Secondary end points included bypass patency, need for major amputation, 30-day morbidity and mortality, length of operation, and length of hospitalization. Wound complications were measured using Szilagyi's method, with class I characterized by erythema necessitating antibiotics, class II having drainage or superficial dehiscence, and class III threatening graft integrity and requiring surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 168 LE bypasses with EVH were performed on 166 patients. Of these, 65.48% were male with a median age of 68.4 ± 9.7 years. There were no wound complications related to saphenectomy. Surgical site infections occurred in 22 patients (13.10%). Seven patients (4.17%) had class I complications, 12 (7.14%) had class II complications, and 3 (1.79%) had class III complications. Primary patency at 30 days was 96.10% and 86.84% at 1 year). Seven patients (4.17%) required major amputation at 30 days. The 1-year amputation-free survival was 89.39%. The 30-day postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates were 0.60%, 0.60%, and 2.38%, respectively. The median operative time was 3.30 ± 1.18 hours. The median length of hospitalization was 3.00 ± 3.56 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EVH minimizes saphenectomy wound complications without compromising patency and limb salvage rates. Older studies suggesting lower patency rates after EVH may have been limited by older technology and inexperienced operators. Whether EVH should be the standard of care for LE bypass warrants further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000801/pdfft?md5=15d8c33febd77596c70935bc6bdc05db&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000801-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由于手术伤口并发症导致的早期发病率较低,内镜下静脉采集术(EVH)被认为是冠状动脉搭桥术的标准治疗方法。然而,由于担心移植物通畅性下降,EVH用于下肢(LE)搭桥术仍存在争议。2022 年,BEST-CLI 试验(重症肢体缺血患者最佳血管内治疗与最佳外科治疗)表明,在大隐静脉质量足够好的情况下接受外科搭桥术的患者与接受血管内修复术的患者相比,肢体重大不良事件的发生率和死亡率更低。尽管取得了这些结果,但大面积采集部位切口造成的伤口并发症仍是阻碍手术搭桥成为首选初始治疗方法的重要障碍。为了减少伤口并发症,我们采用 EVH 作为采集旁路导管的标准方法。在此,我们报告了最近5年使用EVH进行LE旁路手术的经验。方法从2017年到2022年,我们对168例使用EVH的LE旁路手术进行了评估。队列包括 8 家医院的 14 名血管外科医生。主要终点是 30 天手术伤口并发症。次要终点包括旁路通畅率、大截肢需求、30 天发病率和死亡率、手术时间和住院时间。伤口并发症采用 Szilagyi 方法进行测量,I 级为红斑,需要使用抗生素;II 级为引流或浅表裂开;III 级为威胁移植物完整性,需要手术干预。其中 65.48% 为男性,中位年龄为 68.4 ± 9.7 岁。没有出现与套管切除术相关的伤口并发症。22名患者(13.10%)发生了手术部位感染。7名患者(4.17%)出现一级并发症,12名患者(7.14%)出现二级并发症,3名患者(1.79%)出现三级并发症。30天的初次通畅率为96.10%,1年的初次通畅率为86.84%)。7名患者(4.17%)在30天内需要进行大截肢手术。1年无截肢生存率为89.39%。术后 30 天的中风、心肌梗死和死亡率分别为 0.60%、0.60% 和 2.38%。中位手术时间为(3.30 ± 1.18)小时。结论EVH最大程度地减少了鞘膜切除术伤口并发症,同时不影响通畅率和肢体挽救率。较早的研究表明,EVH术后的通畅率较低,这可能是受到较早的技术和缺乏经验的操作者的限制。EVH是否应该成为LE搭桥术的标准护理方法还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contemporary outcomes after endoscopic vein harvesting for lower extremity bypass in a multicenter subspecialty practice

Background

Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) is considered the standard of care for coronary bypass procedures given the lower early morbidity from surgical wound complications. However, the use of EVH for lower extremity (LE) bypass remains controversial owing to concerns about decreased graft patency. In 2022, the BEST-CLI Trial (Best Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia) demonstrated patients undergoing surgical bypass with adequate great saphenous vein quality experienced a lower incidence of major adverse limb events and mortality than those who underwent endovascular repair. Despite these results, wound complications from large harvest site incisions remain a significant barrier preventing surgical bypass as being the preferred initial treatment. To mitigate wound complications, our practice has adopted EVH as the standard approach for harvesting bypass conduit. Here, we report our recent 5-year experience using EVH for LE bypass.

Methods

One hundred sixty-eight LE bypasses with EVH were evaluated from 2017 to 2022. The cohort included 14 vascular surgeons in 8 hospitals. The primary end point was 30-day surgical wound complications. Secondary end points included bypass patency, need for major amputation, 30-day morbidity and mortality, length of operation, and length of hospitalization. Wound complications were measured using Szilagyi's method, with class I characterized by erythema necessitating antibiotics, class II having drainage or superficial dehiscence, and class III threatening graft integrity and requiring surgical intervention.

Results

A total of 168 LE bypasses with EVH were performed on 166 patients. Of these, 65.48% were male with a median age of 68.4 ± 9.7 years. There were no wound complications related to saphenectomy. Surgical site infections occurred in 22 patients (13.10%). Seven patients (4.17%) had class I complications, 12 (7.14%) had class II complications, and 3 (1.79%) had class III complications. Primary patency at 30 days was 96.10% and 86.84% at 1 year). Seven patients (4.17%) required major amputation at 30 days. The 1-year amputation-free survival was 89.39%. The 30-day postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates were 0.60%, 0.60%, and 2.38%, respectively. The median operative time was 3.30 ± 1.18 hours. The median length of hospitalization was 3.00 ± 3.56 days.

Conclusions

EVH minimizes saphenectomy wound complications without compromising patency and limb salvage rates. Older studies suggesting lower patency rates after EVH may have been limited by older technology and inexperienced operators. Whether EVH should be the standard of care for LE bypass warrants further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1