絮凝沉降技术对使用天然压舱物的浮游植物形态功能群生物量和组成的影响

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s10750-024-05664-6
Fernanda Monicelli, Fabiana Araújo, Karina Patrícia Vieira da Cunha, Juliana Deo Dias, Vanessa Becker
{"title":"絮凝沉降技术对使用天然压舱物的浮游植物形态功能群生物量和组成的影响","authors":"Fernanda Monicelli, Fabiana Araújo, Karina Patrícia Vieira da Cunha, Juliana Deo Dias, Vanessa Becker","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05664-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The different characteristics of phytoplankton species, such as morphology and the mechanism of resistance to sedimentation, can impact the effectiveness of the Floc &amp; Sink (F&amp;S) technique. In this study, we aimed to analyze the effects of the F&amp;S on biomass and phytoplankton composition, in eutrophic waters from Brazilian semiarid. We applied a chemical coagulant (polyaluminum chloride—PAC), isolated and in combination with natural ballasts (planosol, beige lime and white lime). To assess adaptive strategies, such as positive buoyancy, we applied the morphology-based functional groups (MBFG) approach. The technique effects on the phytoplankton biomass and composition varied according to the sedimentation resistance mechanism. Group IV, lacking specialized characteristics, sedimented in all treatments. The presence of a mucilage sheath and aerotopes prevented its sedimentation in all treatments, and when <i>Microcystis aeruginosa</i> was not present, Group VII sedimented after all treatments. Neither Group V (flagellates) and VI (small diatoms) exhibited sedimentation. Also, filamentous cyanobacteria (Group VIII) demonstrated enhanced resistance to sedimentation and only sedimented when there was a combination of PAC + natural ballasts. Furthermore, employing natural ballast materials provides a cost-effective alternative for removing algal biomass, being observed a drop of 70–80%. Thus, the combination of PAC + natural ballasts was more suitable to remove biomass than PAC alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Floc & Sink technique on the biomass and composition of phytoplankton morpho-functional groups using natural ballasts\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Monicelli, Fabiana Araújo, Karina Patrícia Vieira da Cunha, Juliana Deo Dias, Vanessa Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10750-024-05664-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The different characteristics of phytoplankton species, such as morphology and the mechanism of resistance to sedimentation, can impact the effectiveness of the Floc &amp; Sink (F&amp;S) technique. In this study, we aimed to analyze the effects of the F&amp;S on biomass and phytoplankton composition, in eutrophic waters from Brazilian semiarid. We applied a chemical coagulant (polyaluminum chloride—PAC), isolated and in combination with natural ballasts (planosol, beige lime and white lime). To assess adaptive strategies, such as positive buoyancy, we applied the morphology-based functional groups (MBFG) approach. The technique effects on the phytoplankton biomass and composition varied according to the sedimentation resistance mechanism. Group IV, lacking specialized characteristics, sedimented in all treatments. The presence of a mucilage sheath and aerotopes prevented its sedimentation in all treatments, and when <i>Microcystis aeruginosa</i> was not present, Group VII sedimented after all treatments. Neither Group V (flagellates) and VI (small diatoms) exhibited sedimentation. Also, filamentous cyanobacteria (Group VIII) demonstrated enhanced resistance to sedimentation and only sedimented when there was a combination of PAC + natural ballasts. Furthermore, employing natural ballast materials provides a cost-effective alternative for removing algal biomass, being observed a drop of 70–80%. Thus, the combination of PAC + natural ballasts was more suitable to remove biomass than PAC alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05664-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05664-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浮游植物物种的不同特征(如形态和抗沉积机制)会影响絮凝沉降(F&S)技术的效果。本研究旨在分析絮凝沉降技术对巴西半干旱富营养化水域生物量和浮游植物组成的影响。我们单独使用了一种化学混凝剂(聚合氯化铝-PAC),并将其与天然镇流器(planosol、米色石灰和白色石灰)结合使用。为了评估正浮力等适应策略,我们采用了基于形态的功能组(MBFG)方法。根据沉积阻力机制的不同,技术对浮游植物生物量和组成的影响也不同。第 IV 组缺乏专门特征,在所有处理中都会沉积。当铜绿微囊藻不存在时,第七组在所有处理后都会沉积。第五组(鞭毛藻)和第六组(小型硅藻)均未出现沉淀现象。此外,丝状蓝藻(第 VIII 组)表现出更强的抗沉积能力,只有在使用 PAC 和天然压舱物时才会沉积。此外,使用天然镇流器材料是去除藻类生物量的一种具有成本效益的替代方法,据观察,藻类生物量下降了 70-80%。因此,PAC 和天然镇流器的组合比单独使用 PAC 更适合去除生物量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the Floc & Sink technique on the biomass and composition of phytoplankton morpho-functional groups using natural ballasts

The different characteristics of phytoplankton species, such as morphology and the mechanism of resistance to sedimentation, can impact the effectiveness of the Floc & Sink (F&S) technique. In this study, we aimed to analyze the effects of the F&S on biomass and phytoplankton composition, in eutrophic waters from Brazilian semiarid. We applied a chemical coagulant (polyaluminum chloride—PAC), isolated and in combination with natural ballasts (planosol, beige lime and white lime). To assess adaptive strategies, such as positive buoyancy, we applied the morphology-based functional groups (MBFG) approach. The technique effects on the phytoplankton biomass and composition varied according to the sedimentation resistance mechanism. Group IV, lacking specialized characteristics, sedimented in all treatments. The presence of a mucilage sheath and aerotopes prevented its sedimentation in all treatments, and when Microcystis aeruginosa was not present, Group VII sedimented after all treatments. Neither Group V (flagellates) and VI (small diatoms) exhibited sedimentation. Also, filamentous cyanobacteria (Group VIII) demonstrated enhanced resistance to sedimentation and only sedimented when there was a combination of PAC + natural ballasts. Furthermore, employing natural ballast materials provides a cost-effective alternative for removing algal biomass, being observed a drop of 70–80%. Thus, the combination of PAC + natural ballasts was more suitable to remove biomass than PAC alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1