{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的疼痛缓解:术前局部麻醉浸润与术后局部麻醉浸润--随机对照试验","authors":"Gagan Soni, Devender Singh, Amol Sood, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Piyush Ranjan, Ankita Singh, Nitin Choudhary, Sunil Chumber","doi":"10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a widely performed procedure globally, often results in post-operative pain, which impacts the length of hospital stay and imposes financial burdens. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of pre-emptive versus post-operative local anaesthetic infiltration at port-site incisions on post-operative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Patients and methods</h3><p>This double-blinded study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital, included 50 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided into two groups: Pre-emptive analgesia (group A) and post-operative analgesia (group B). Randomization was performed with sealed envelopes, and patients were evaluated preoperatively. Pain scores, shoulder pain incidence, hospital stay duration, analgesic requirements, and return to normal activity were compared between the groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Baseline demographic profiles were comparable. Pre-emptive analgesia demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and 7 days post-operatively with no significant difference in shoulder pain incidence. Pre-emptive analgesia correlated with a markedly shorter hospital stay reduced analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal activity. Only 10% of patients from the post-operative analgesia group required additional analgesia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration at port sites yielded significant benefits, including reduced pain, lower analgesic requirements, shorter hospital stays, and earlier resumption of routine activities compared to post-operative infiltration.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial Registration</h3><p>This project is registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) CTRI Number: CTRI/2023/08/056175 [Registered on: 07/08/2023]—trial registered prospectively</p>","PeriodicalId":13391,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pre-emptive Versus Post-operative Local Anaesthetic Infiltration—A Randomized Control Trial\",\"authors\":\"Gagan Soni, Devender Singh, Amol Sood, Yashwant Singh Rathore, Piyush Ranjan, Ankita Singh, Nitin Choudhary, Sunil Chumber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a widely performed procedure globally, often results in post-operative pain, which impacts the length of hospital stay and imposes financial burdens. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of pre-emptive versus post-operative local anaesthetic infiltration at port-site incisions on post-operative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Patients and methods</h3><p>This double-blinded study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital, included 50 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided into two groups: Pre-emptive analgesia (group A) and post-operative analgesia (group B). Randomization was performed with sealed envelopes, and patients were evaluated preoperatively. Pain scores, shoulder pain incidence, hospital stay duration, analgesic requirements, and return to normal activity were compared between the groups.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Baseline demographic profiles were comparable. Pre-emptive analgesia demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and 7 days post-operatively with no significant difference in shoulder pain incidence. Pre-emptive analgesia correlated with a markedly shorter hospital stay reduced analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal activity. Only 10% of patients from the post-operative analgesia group required additional analgesia.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration at port sites yielded significant benefits, including reduced pain, lower analgesic requirements, shorter hospital stays, and earlier resumption of routine activities compared to post-operative infiltration.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Trial Registration</h3><p>This project is registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) CTRI Number: CTRI/2023/08/056175 [Registered on: 07/08/2023]—trial registered prospectively</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04127-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pre-emptive Versus Post-operative Local Anaesthetic Infiltration—A Randomized Control Trial
Introduction
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a widely performed procedure globally, often results in post-operative pain, which impacts the length of hospital stay and imposes financial burdens. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of pre-emptive versus post-operative local anaesthetic infiltration at port-site incisions on post-operative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.
Patients and methods
This double-blinded study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital, included 50 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided into two groups: Pre-emptive analgesia (group A) and post-operative analgesia (group B). Randomization was performed with sealed envelopes, and patients were evaluated preoperatively. Pain scores, shoulder pain incidence, hospital stay duration, analgesic requirements, and return to normal activity were compared between the groups.
Results
Baseline demographic profiles were comparable. Pre-emptive analgesia demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and 7 days post-operatively with no significant difference in shoulder pain incidence. Pre-emptive analgesia correlated with a markedly shorter hospital stay reduced analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal activity. Only 10% of patients from the post-operative analgesia group required additional analgesia.
Conclusion
Pre-emptive local anaesthetic infiltration at port sites yielded significant benefits, including reduced pain, lower analgesic requirements, shorter hospital stays, and earlier resumption of routine activities compared to post-operative infiltration.
Trial Registration
This project is registered under the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) CTRI Number: CTRI/2023/08/056175 [Registered on: 07/08/2023]—trial registered prospectively
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India that considers for publication articles in all fields of surgery. Issues are published bimonthly in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December.
The journal publishes Original article, Point of technique, Review article, Case report, Letter to editor, Teachers and surgeons from the past - A short (up to 500 words) bio sketch of a revered teacher or surgeon whom you hold in esteem and Images in surgery, surgical pathology, and surgical radiology.
A trusted resource for peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery
Provides a forum for surgeons in India and abroad to exchange ideas and advance the art of surgery
The official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India
92% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again
The Indian Journal of Surgery offers peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery. The Journal publishes Original articles, Points of technique, Review articles, Case reports, Letters, Images and brief biographies of influential teachers and surgeons.
The Journal spans General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Rural Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, Surgical Oncology, Radiology, Anaesthesia, Trauma Services, Minimal Access Surgery, Endocrine Surgery, GI Surgery, ENT, Colorectal Surgery, surgical practice and research.
The Journal provides a forum for surgeons from India and abroad to exchange ideas, to propagate the advancement of science and the art of surgery and to promote friendship among surgeons in India and abroad. This has been a trusted platform for surgons in communicating up-to-date scientific informeation to the community.