{"title":"选择差分剪接方法:实际考虑因素","authors":"Ben J Draper, Mark J Dunning, David C James","doi":"arxiv-2409.05458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative splicing is crucial in gene regulation, with significant\nimplications in clinical settings and biotechnology. This review article\ncompiles bioinformatics RNA-seq tools for investigating differential splicing;\noffering a detailed examination of their statistical methods, case\napplications, and benefits. A total of 22 tools are categorised by their\nstatistical family (parametric, non-parametric, and probabilistic) and level of\nanalysis (transcript, exon, and event). The central challenges in quantifying\nalternative splicing include correct splice site identification and accurate\nisoform deconvolution of transcripts. Benchmarking studies show no consensus on\ntool performance, revealing considerable variability across different\nscenarios. Tools with high citation frequency and continued developer\nmaintenance, such as DEXSeq and rMATS, are recommended for prospective\nresearchers. To aid in tool selection, a guide schematic is proposed based on\nvariations in data input and the required level of analysis. Additionally,\nadvancements in long-read RNA sequencing are expected to drive the evolution of\ndifferential splicing tools, reducing the need for isoform deconvolution and\nprompting further innovation.","PeriodicalId":501070,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Genomics","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting Differential Splicing Methods: Practical Considerations\",\"authors\":\"Ben J Draper, Mark J Dunning, David C James\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.05458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alternative splicing is crucial in gene regulation, with significant\\nimplications in clinical settings and biotechnology. This review article\\ncompiles bioinformatics RNA-seq tools for investigating differential splicing;\\noffering a detailed examination of their statistical methods, case\\napplications, and benefits. A total of 22 tools are categorised by their\\nstatistical family (parametric, non-parametric, and probabilistic) and level of\\nanalysis (transcript, exon, and event). The central challenges in quantifying\\nalternative splicing include correct splice site identification and accurate\\nisoform deconvolution of transcripts. Benchmarking studies show no consensus on\\ntool performance, revealing considerable variability across different\\nscenarios. Tools with high citation frequency and continued developer\\nmaintenance, such as DEXSeq and rMATS, are recommended for prospective\\nresearchers. To aid in tool selection, a guide schematic is proposed based on\\nvariations in data input and the required level of analysis. Additionally,\\nadvancements in long-read RNA sequencing are expected to drive the evolution of\\ndifferential splicing tools, reducing the need for isoform deconvolution and\\nprompting further innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Genomics\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alternative splicing is crucial in gene regulation, with significant
implications in clinical settings and biotechnology. This review article
compiles bioinformatics RNA-seq tools for investigating differential splicing;
offering a detailed examination of their statistical methods, case
applications, and benefits. A total of 22 tools are categorised by their
statistical family (parametric, non-parametric, and probabilistic) and level of
analysis (transcript, exon, and event). The central challenges in quantifying
alternative splicing include correct splice site identification and accurate
isoform deconvolution of transcripts. Benchmarking studies show no consensus on
tool performance, revealing considerable variability across different
scenarios. Tools with high citation frequency and continued developer
maintenance, such as DEXSeq and rMATS, are recommended for prospective
researchers. To aid in tool selection, a guide schematic is proposed based on
variations in data input and the required level of analysis. Additionally,
advancements in long-read RNA sequencing are expected to drive the evolution of
differential splicing tools, reducing the need for isoform deconvolution and
prompting further innovation.