Geng Hu, Bin Tian, Shaoli Han, Shiwei Wang, Marcus Hacker, Xiang Li, Xia Bai
{"title":"通过 11C-Choline PET/CT 成像对复发性胶质瘤进行预后评估","authors":"Geng Hu, Bin Tian, Shaoli Han, Shiwei Wang, Marcus Hacker, Xiang Li, Xia Bai","doi":"10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Glioma, a primary malignant tumor originating from glial cells, represents approximately 81% of intracranial malignant tumors. It is known for its high heterogeneity and generally poor prognosis [1,2,3]. Despite comprehensive treatment approaches, the prognosis for glioma remains grim due to its highly malignant nature [4]. Surgical intervention, primarily through routine craniotomy, has been the traditional treatment method, although it involves significant trauma and has long lacked an ideal approach. Conventional surgical treatments showed a high recurrence rate, necessitating supplementary postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy [5, 6].</p><p>Recent studies emphasize the critical role of postoperative radiotherapy, particularly intensity-modulated radiotherapy [7]. This technique offers precise targeting and dose concentration, effectively eliminating glioma while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues [7]. Traditional imaging may lead to misinterpretations of therapeutic outcomes, such as pseudo-progression, where treatment may initially seem to worsen tumor imaging or symptoms, yet these can improve if the current treatment plan is maintained [8, 9].</p><p>Innovations in PET imaging with <sup>11</sup>C or <sup>18</sup>F-labeled choline (CHO) have shown promise in tumor diagnostics. CHO enters cells via high-affinity choline transporters, is phosphorylated by choline kinase, and integrated into phosphatidylcholine, reflecting the synthesis activity of the cell membrane system [10, 11]. CHO uptake is low in normal brain tissue but significantly higher in rapidly proliferating tumor cells. Several quantitative markers, such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>), average standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub>), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion CHO uptake (TLG), and the tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio (T/N ratio), have proven crucial for correlating with glioma grading. These markers offer prognostic distinctions superior to those based on the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system [12, 13].</p><p>Utilizing <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging technology, type, location, and extent of tumors could be pinpointed more accurately. This method not only facilitates precise pre-surgical diagnoses and tumor boundary delineation but also provides insights into the tumor’s biological characteristics and invasiveness. Such detailed information is vital for crafting personalized treatment plans and for surgical planning, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing risks. Postoperatively, <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging is invaluable for monitoring treatment response, evaluating residual tumors, assessing recurrence risks, and improving overall prognosis [14, 15].</p><p>This pilot study retrospectively analyzed 38 patients with recurrent glioma, as determined by <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging. The findings affirm the significant prognostic value of this imaging technology in assessing glioma outcomes and offer a reliable reference for prognosis evaluations in clinical settings.</p><h3>Participants</h3><p>This study retrospective included participants have a histopathological confirmed diagnosis of glioma, have undergone prior treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, from January 2019 to October 2021. PET Scans were performed post-operatively and during follow-up periods for monitoring. Patients presented elevated <sup>11</sup>C-CHO uptake were retrospective recruited. Patients’ demographic and clinical information were collected. Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the imaging examinations. Patients with presence of brain metastases from other malignant tumors or non-glioma primary brain tumors were excluded.</p><h3>PET imaging agent</h3><p>The <sup>11</sup>C-CHO agent was synthesized using a Sumitomo HM-20 S cyclotron and a GE TRACERLab FX-C chemical synthesizer, with HPLC purification by Shimadzu Corporation and TLC by Bioscan Corporation. The agent, provided by the Nuclear Medicine Department, exhibited a radioactive chemical purity of over 95%. All Participants were briefed about the procedure and signed informed consent forms before imaging.</p><h3>Imaging procedure</h3><p>After administering 10–15 mCi (370–555 Mbq) of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO intravenously. A CT scan covered the skull top to base, using 140 kV, 110 mA, and a 5 mm slice thickness. PET imaging acquisition (ZOOM 2, slice thickness 5 mm) followed in three-dimensional mode within the same field of view (Biograph mCT Flow, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany) after 30–60 min. The PET images were corrected for attenuation using the CT data and then fused with the CT images.</p><h3>Image analysis</h3><p>The adjusted PET images were then processed using Euclid software (version1.0, Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) for tumor delineation. Images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine and CT specialists using a centralized reading approach using semi-automated 3D isocount volume-of-interest (VOI) tools to define tumor boundaries. Where necessary, a manual adjustment tool was used for slice-by-slice refinement when the automated tools failed to accurately define the tumor edges. Additionally, a reference VOI was set up in a mirror-image region to assist with tissue-background ratio (TBR) calculations. The system then automatically calculated the radioactive count for each ROI, determining the SUV<sub>max,</sub> SUV<sub>mean</sub>, MTV, and TLG values.</p><h3>Clinical and survival analysis</h3><p>The associations between WHO grade, IDH mutation status, and imaging parameters were analyzed. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) was defined as the time between initiating PET imaging and date of death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to study the prognostic value of PET-related parameters including SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, MTV and TLG for PRS. The surv_cutpoint function of the survminer package in R (v0.4.9) was used to determine the optimal split point for continuous variables in the Kaplan Meier analysis. <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We have included additional analysis using Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate outcome.</p><p>The cohort consisted of 38 patients with a median age of 48 years (range: 17–71). The patients’ gliomas were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, with seven patients having grade III gliomas and nine patients having grade IV gliomas. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. SUV<sub>mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79), SUV<sub>max</sub>(<i>r</i> = 0.78), and TLG(<i>r</i> = 0.49), but not MTV(<i>r</i> = 0.21), were significantly associated with WHO grade (<i>P</i> < 0.01). However, none showed a significant relationship with IDH mutation status (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"table-caption\">Table 1 Patient characteristics</b></figcaption><span>Full size table</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><h3>Clinical and survival analysis</h3><p>We divided patients into two groups based on WHO grade: a high-grade group (WHO grades III and IV) and a low-grade group (WHO grades I and II). In the high-grade group, patients with lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values had more favorable survival outcomes, with TLG showing a significant correlation with prognostic risk (<i>p</i> = 0.019). Similarly, in the low-grade group, lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values were associated with better survival outcomes. Specifically, MTV and TLG were significantly correlated with prognostic risk, with <i>p</i>-values of 0.034 and 0.023, respectively. (supplemental files). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed significant correlations between parameters such as the maximum SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG with the prognostic risk, whereas the MTV result did not demonstrate significant association. Figure 1 provides illustrative examples of representative patients. Notably, patients exhibiting lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, or TLG values exhibited more favorable survival outcomes, with respective <i>p</i>-values of 0.0055, 0.011, and 0.044, as depicted in Fig. 2.</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"figure-caption-text\">Fig. 1</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp\" type=\"image/webp\"/><img alt=\"figure 1\" aria-describedby=\"Fig1\" height=\"513\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.png\" width=\"685\"/></picture><p>Patient <b>A</b>: a 41-year-old male diagnosed with mixed oligodendroglioma (WHO grade II), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in the left frontal lobe (SUV<sub>max</sub>=2.10; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=1.22; MTV = 4.88cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Alive, survival period of 38 months</p><p>Patient <b>B</b>: a 43-year-old male diagnosed with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (WHO grade III), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in the left frontal lobe (SUV<sub>max</sub>=5.28; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=3.17; MTV = 3.01 cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Deceased, survival period of 12 months</p><p>Patient <b>C</b>: a 57-year-old male diagnosed with glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in bilateral frontal lobes and the genu of corpus callosum (SUV<sub>max</sub>=3.59; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=1.97; MTV = 24.81 cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Deceased, survival period of 6 months</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"figure-caption-text\">Fig. 2</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp\" type=\"image/webp\"/><img alt=\"figure 2\" aria-describedby=\"Fig2\" height=\"653\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig2_HTML.png\" width=\"685\"/></picture><p>Kaplan-Meier curves of OS according to the patients’ baseline PET-related parameters derived from tumor lesions of whole brain</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><p>Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate the influence of various PET parameters on post-recurrence survival. The analysis revealed that lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and MTV values did not have a statistically significant association with improved survival outcomes, as indicated by hazard ratios showing a reduced risk of mortality (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). However, contrary to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, lower TLG values were not linked to poorer survival outcomes. (supplemental files).</p><p>The findings of this retrospective analysis reinforce the substantial prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma. By providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, this study highlights the advantages of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT in facilitating more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning.</p><p><sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging has provided distinct advantages over traditional imaging modalities, particularly in its ability to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced changes such as pseudo-progression [8, 9]. This capability is crucial because it informs more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning. In this present study, by providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT not only facilitates the identification and delineation of residual disease post-surgery which potentially including targeted radiotherapy, but also proves indispensable in postoperative assessments and long-term management.</p><p>The study’s findings also underscored the superior prognostic value of PET-related parameters such as SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG. The correlation of these parameters with patient survival suggests that lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG are associated with better survival outcomes. Interestingly, MTV did not show a significant correlation with PRS, indicating that the metabolic activity reflected by SUV and TLG might be more indicative of tumor aggressiveness than the volume measured alone.</p><p>These results have important implications for the clinical management of glioma. The ability of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT to provide quantitative and qualitative data enhances the WHO grading system, offering a more nuanced approach to patient stratification and personalized treatment planning. As the integration of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT in clinical settings continues to evolve, its potential to significantly improve patient outcomes becomes increasingly apparent. This in vivo approach ensures rigorous data collection and analysis, aiming to assess the prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging in glioma recurrence and to contribute significantly to personalized patient management strategies, but its short half-life limits availability to centers with on-site cyclotrons. FET PET/CT, with a longer half-life, is more accessible. However, <sup>18</sup>F-FET may show lower uptake in low-grade gliomas, potentially underestimating residual disease.</p><p><sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging is warranted in patients with suspected recurrent glioma to confirm recurrence for tailor personalized treatment plans, potentially including targeted radiotherapy based on the metabolic activity and extent of the tumor.</p><p>While the findings of this study demonstrate the substantial prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma, several limitations should be acknowledged: The study is based on a relatively small sample size; larger, multicentric trials are needed. As a retrospective study, it is subject to inherent biases such as selection bias and information bias. While the study highlights the advantages of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT, it does not extensively compare this modality with other advanced imaging techniques such as MRI or other PET tracers.</p><p>This study demonstrated that <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT are associated with post-recurrence survival, suggesting their utility in predicting patient outcomes effectively. Future studies should focus on validating these results in a larger cohort to establish standardized protocols that leverage the prognostic capabilities of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging in managing glioma.</p><p>The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p><dl><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>PET:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Positron emission tomography</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>CT:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Computed tomography</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>\n<sup>11</sup>C-CHO:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p><sup>11</sup>C-Choline</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>SUVmax:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Maximum standardized uptake value</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>SUVmean:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Average standardized uptake value</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>MTV:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Metabolic tumor volume</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>TLG:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Total lesion CHO uptake</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>T/N ratio:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>WHO:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>World Health Organization</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>VOI:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Volume-of-interest</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>TBR:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Tissue-background ratio</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>PRS:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Post-recurrence survival</p>\n</dd></dl><ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li data-counter=\"1.\"><p>Xu H, Zhang A, Han X, et al. ITGB2 as a prognostic indicator and a predictive marker for immunotherapy in gliomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(3):645–60.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"2.\"><p>Du Q, Lin Y, Zhang W, He F, Xu Y, Chen Z. Bioinformatics analysis of LMAN1 expression, clinical characteristics, and its effects on cell proliferation and invasion in glioma. Brain Res. 2022;1789:147952.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"3.\"><p>Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"4.\"><p>Vasilev A, Sofi R, Rahman R, Smith SJ, Teschemacher AG, Kasparov S. Using light for therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Brain Sci. 2020;10(2):75. Published 2020 Jan 31.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"5.\"><p>Roda D, Veiga P, Melo JB, Carreira IM, Ribeiro IP. Principles in the management of Glioblastoma. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(4):501. Published 2024 Apr 17.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"6.\"><p>Weller M, Cloughesy T, Perry JR, Wick W. Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma–are we there yet? Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(1):4–27.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"7.\"><p>Martín-Abreu C, Fariña-Jerónimo H, Plata-Bello J. Radiological and not clinical variables Guide the Surgical Plan in patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2024;31(4):1899–912.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"8.\"><p>Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):453–61.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"9.\"><p>Knudsen-Baas KM, Moen G, Fluge Ø, Storstein A. Pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma [published correction appears in Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;127(3):e17]. <i>Acta Neurol Scand Suppl</i>. 2013;(196):31–37.</p></li><li data-counter=\"10.\"><p>Giovannini E, Lazzeri P, Milano A, Gaeta MC, Ciarmiello A. Clinical applications of choline PET/CT in brain tumors. Curr Pharm Design. 2015;21(1):121–7.</p><p>Article CAS Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"11.\"><p>Alongi P, Vetrano IG, Fiasconaro E, et al. Choline-PET/CT in the Differential diagnosis between cystic Glioblastoma and Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage. Curr Radiopharm. 2019;12(1):88–92.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"12.\"><p>Kong Z, Jiang C, Liu D, Chen W, Ma W, Cheng X, Wang Y. Quantitative features from CHO PET distinguish the WHO grades of primary diffuse glioma. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46(2):103–10.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"13.\"><p>Shi Y, Liu D, Kong Z, et al. Prognostic value of Choline and other metabolites measured using 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Gliomas: a Meta-analysis and systemic review. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1219. Published 2022 Dec 5.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"14.\"><p>Kim S, Kim D, Kim SH, Park MA, Chang JH, Yun M. The roles of 11 C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(6):1012–20.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"15.\"><p>Hu M, Zhu Y, Mu D, et al. Correlation of hypoxia as measured by fluorine-18 fluoroerythronitroimidazole (18F-FETNIM) PET/CT and overall survival in glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(6):1427–34.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>This study was funded by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (201802111).</p><span>Author notes</span><ol><li><p>Geng Hu and Bin Tian share the authorship.</p></li></ol><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, #1 Tongdao North Street.Huimin District, Hohhot, 010050, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China</p><p>Geng Hu, Bin Tian & Xia Bai</p></li><li><p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic, Capital Medical University, Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China</p><p>Xiang Li</p></li><li><p>Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria</p><p>Marcus Hacker & Xiang Li</p></li><li><p>Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China</p><p>Shaoli Han & Shiwei Wang</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Geng Hu</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Bin Tian</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Shaoli Han</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Shiwei Wang</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Marcus Hacker</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Xiang Li</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Xia Bai</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Contributions</h3><p>GH: Data curation, Writing-Original draft. BT: Investigation, Writing-Original draft. SH: Formal analysis, Visualization. SW: Investigation. MH: Supervision. XL: Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing. XB: Methodology, Resources, Project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p><h3>Corresponding authors</h3><p>Correspondence to Xiang Li or Xia Bai.</p><h3>Ethical approval</h3>\n<p>All procedures involving human participants in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University - Approval no. WZ20150014); the study protocol complied with the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki.</p>\n<h3>Consent for publication</h3>\n<p>Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for publication of this study and accompanying images.</p>\n<h3>Conflict of interest</h3>\n<p>no conflict of interest.</p>\n<h3>Consent to participate</h3>\n<p>Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.</p><h3>Publisher’s note</h3><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p><p>Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.</p><h3>Supplementary Material 1</h3><h3>Supplementary Material 2</h3><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.</p>\n<p>Reprints and permissions</p><img alt=\"Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark\" height=\"81\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\" width=\"57\"/><h3>Cite this article</h3><p>Hu, G., Tian, B., Han, S. <i>et al.</i> Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT imaging. <i>EJNMMI Res</i> <b>14</b>, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x</p><p>Download citation<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><ul data-test=\"publication-history\"><li><p>Received<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2024-06-03\">03 June 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Accepted<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2024-08-29\">29 August 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Published<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2024-09-12\">12 September 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>DOI</abbr><span>: </span><span>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x</span></p></li></ul><h3>Share this article</h3><p>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:</p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"get shareable link\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Get shareable link</button><p>Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.</p><p data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"select share url\" data-track-label=\"button\"></p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"copy share url\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Copy to clipboard</button><p> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative </p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through 11C-Choline PET/CT imaging\",\"authors\":\"Geng Hu, Bin Tian, Shaoli Han, Shiwei Wang, Marcus Hacker, Xiang Li, Xia Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Glioma, a primary malignant tumor originating from glial cells, represents approximately 81% of intracranial malignant tumors. It is known for its high heterogeneity and generally poor prognosis [1,2,3]. Despite comprehensive treatment approaches, the prognosis for glioma remains grim due to its highly malignant nature [4]. Surgical intervention, primarily through routine craniotomy, has been the traditional treatment method, although it involves significant trauma and has long lacked an ideal approach. Conventional surgical treatments showed a high recurrence rate, necessitating supplementary postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy [5, 6].</p><p>Recent studies emphasize the critical role of postoperative radiotherapy, particularly intensity-modulated radiotherapy [7]. This technique offers precise targeting and dose concentration, effectively eliminating glioma while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues [7]. Traditional imaging may lead to misinterpretations of therapeutic outcomes, such as pseudo-progression, where treatment may initially seem to worsen tumor imaging or symptoms, yet these can improve if the current treatment plan is maintained [8, 9].</p><p>Innovations in PET imaging with <sup>11</sup>C or <sup>18</sup>F-labeled choline (CHO) have shown promise in tumor diagnostics. CHO enters cells via high-affinity choline transporters, is phosphorylated by choline kinase, and integrated into phosphatidylcholine, reflecting the synthesis activity of the cell membrane system [10, 11]. CHO uptake is low in normal brain tissue but significantly higher in rapidly proliferating tumor cells. Several quantitative markers, such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>), average standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub>), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion CHO uptake (TLG), and the tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio (T/N ratio), have proven crucial for correlating with glioma grading. These markers offer prognostic distinctions superior to those based on the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system [12, 13].</p><p>Utilizing <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging technology, type, location, and extent of tumors could be pinpointed more accurately. This method not only facilitates precise pre-surgical diagnoses and tumor boundary delineation but also provides insights into the tumor’s biological characteristics and invasiveness. Such detailed information is vital for crafting personalized treatment plans and for surgical planning, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing risks. Postoperatively, <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging is invaluable for monitoring treatment response, evaluating residual tumors, assessing recurrence risks, and improving overall prognosis [14, 15].</p><p>This pilot study retrospectively analyzed 38 patients with recurrent glioma, as determined by <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging. The findings affirm the significant prognostic value of this imaging technology in assessing glioma outcomes and offer a reliable reference for prognosis evaluations in clinical settings.</p><h3>Participants</h3><p>This study retrospective included participants have a histopathological confirmed diagnosis of glioma, have undergone prior treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, from January 2019 to October 2021. PET Scans were performed post-operatively and during follow-up periods for monitoring. Patients presented elevated <sup>11</sup>C-CHO uptake were retrospective recruited. Patients’ demographic and clinical information were collected. Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the imaging examinations. Patients with presence of brain metastases from other malignant tumors or non-glioma primary brain tumors were excluded.</p><h3>PET imaging agent</h3><p>The <sup>11</sup>C-CHO agent was synthesized using a Sumitomo HM-20 S cyclotron and a GE TRACERLab FX-C chemical synthesizer, with HPLC purification by Shimadzu Corporation and TLC by Bioscan Corporation. The agent, provided by the Nuclear Medicine Department, exhibited a radioactive chemical purity of over 95%. All Participants were briefed about the procedure and signed informed consent forms before imaging.</p><h3>Imaging procedure</h3><p>After administering 10–15 mCi (370–555 Mbq) of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO intravenously. A CT scan covered the skull top to base, using 140 kV, 110 mA, and a 5 mm slice thickness. PET imaging acquisition (ZOOM 2, slice thickness 5 mm) followed in three-dimensional mode within the same field of view (Biograph mCT Flow, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany) after 30–60 min. The PET images were corrected for attenuation using the CT data and then fused with the CT images.</p><h3>Image analysis</h3><p>The adjusted PET images were then processed using Euclid software (version1.0, Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) for tumor delineation. Images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine and CT specialists using a centralized reading approach using semi-automated 3D isocount volume-of-interest (VOI) tools to define tumor boundaries. Where necessary, a manual adjustment tool was used for slice-by-slice refinement when the automated tools failed to accurately define the tumor edges. Additionally, a reference VOI was set up in a mirror-image region to assist with tissue-background ratio (TBR) calculations. The system then automatically calculated the radioactive count for each ROI, determining the SUV<sub>max,</sub> SUV<sub>mean</sub>, MTV, and TLG values.</p><h3>Clinical and survival analysis</h3><p>The associations between WHO grade, IDH mutation status, and imaging parameters were analyzed. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) was defined as the time between initiating PET imaging and date of death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to study the prognostic value of PET-related parameters including SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, MTV and TLG for PRS. The surv_cutpoint function of the survminer package in R (v0.4.9) was used to determine the optimal split point for continuous variables in the Kaplan Meier analysis. <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We have included additional analysis using Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate outcome.</p><p>The cohort consisted of 38 patients with a median age of 48 years (range: 17–71). The patients’ gliomas were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, with seven patients having grade III gliomas and nine patients having grade IV gliomas. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. SUV<sub>mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79), SUV<sub>max</sub>(<i>r</i> = 0.78), and TLG(<i>r</i> = 0.49), but not MTV(<i>r</i> = 0.21), were significantly associated with WHO grade (<i>P</i> < 0.01). However, none showed a significant relationship with IDH mutation status (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\\\"table-caption\\\">Table 1 Patient characteristics</b></figcaption><span>Full size table</span><svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></figure><h3>Clinical and survival analysis</h3><p>We divided patients into two groups based on WHO grade: a high-grade group (WHO grades III and IV) and a low-grade group (WHO grades I and II). In the high-grade group, patients with lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values had more favorable survival outcomes, with TLG showing a significant correlation with prognostic risk (<i>p</i> = 0.019). Similarly, in the low-grade group, lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values were associated with better survival outcomes. Specifically, MTV and TLG were significantly correlated with prognostic risk, with <i>p</i>-values of 0.034 and 0.023, respectively. (supplemental files). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed significant correlations between parameters such as the maximum SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG with the prognostic risk, whereas the MTV result did not demonstrate significant association. Figure 1 provides illustrative examples of representative patients. Notably, patients exhibiting lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, or TLG values exhibited more favorable survival outcomes, with respective <i>p</i>-values of 0.0055, 0.011, and 0.044, as depicted in Fig. 2.</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\\\"figure-caption-text\\\">Fig. 1</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp\\\" type=\\\"image/webp\\\"/><img alt=\\\"figure 1\\\" aria-describedby=\\\"Fig1\\\" height=\\\"513\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.png\\\" width=\\\"685\\\"/></picture><p>Patient <b>A</b>: a 41-year-old male diagnosed with mixed oligodendroglioma (WHO grade II), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in the left frontal lobe (SUV<sub>max</sub>=2.10; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=1.22; MTV = 4.88cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Alive, survival period of 38 months</p><p>Patient <b>B</b>: a 43-year-old male diagnosed with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (WHO grade III), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in the left frontal lobe (SUV<sub>max</sub>=5.28; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=3.17; MTV = 3.01 cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Deceased, survival period of 12 months</p><p>Patient <b>C</b>: a 57-year-old male diagnosed with glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging showed increased tracer uptake in bilateral frontal lobes and the genu of corpus callosum (SUV<sub>max</sub>=3.59; SUV<sub>mean</sub>=1.97; MTV = 24.81 cm<sup>3</sup>). Follow-up: Deceased, survival period of 6 months</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></figure><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\\\"figure-caption-text\\\">Fig. 2</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp\\\" type=\\\"image/webp\\\"/><img alt=\\\"figure 2\\\" aria-describedby=\\\"Fig2\\\" height=\\\"653\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13550-024-01146-x/MediaObjects/13550_2024_1146_Fig2_HTML.png\\\" width=\\\"685\\\"/></picture><p>Kaplan-Meier curves of OS according to the patients’ baseline PET-related parameters derived from tumor lesions of whole brain</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></figure><p>Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate the influence of various PET parameters on post-recurrence survival. The analysis revealed that lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and MTV values did not have a statistically significant association with improved survival outcomes, as indicated by hazard ratios showing a reduced risk of mortality (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). However, contrary to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, lower TLG values were not linked to poorer survival outcomes. (supplemental files).</p><p>The findings of this retrospective analysis reinforce the substantial prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma. By providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, this study highlights the advantages of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT in facilitating more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning.</p><p><sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging has provided distinct advantages over traditional imaging modalities, particularly in its ability to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced changes such as pseudo-progression [8, 9]. This capability is crucial because it informs more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning. In this present study, by providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT not only facilitates the identification and delineation of residual disease post-surgery which potentially including targeted radiotherapy, but also proves indispensable in postoperative assessments and long-term management.</p><p>The study’s findings also underscored the superior prognostic value of PET-related parameters such as SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG. The correlation of these parameters with patient survival suggests that lower SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG are associated with better survival outcomes. Interestingly, MTV did not show a significant correlation with PRS, indicating that the metabolic activity reflected by SUV and TLG might be more indicative of tumor aggressiveness than the volume measured alone.</p><p>These results have important implications for the clinical management of glioma. The ability of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT to provide quantitative and qualitative data enhances the WHO grading system, offering a more nuanced approach to patient stratification and personalized treatment planning. As the integration of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT in clinical settings continues to evolve, its potential to significantly improve patient outcomes becomes increasingly apparent. This in vivo approach ensures rigorous data collection and analysis, aiming to assess the prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging in glioma recurrence and to contribute significantly to personalized patient management strategies, but its short half-life limits availability to centers with on-site cyclotrons. FET PET/CT, with a longer half-life, is more accessible. However, <sup>18</sup>F-FET may show lower uptake in low-grade gliomas, potentially underestimating residual disease.</p><p><sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging is warranted in patients with suspected recurrent glioma to confirm recurrence for tailor personalized treatment plans, potentially including targeted radiotherapy based on the metabolic activity and extent of the tumor.</p><p>While the findings of this study demonstrate the substantial prognostic value of <sup>11</sup>C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma, several limitations should be acknowledged: The study is based on a relatively small sample size; larger, multicentric trials are needed. As a retrospective study, it is subject to inherent biases such as selection bias and information bias. While the study highlights the advantages of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT, it does not extensively compare this modality with other advanced imaging techniques such as MRI or other PET tracers.</p><p>This study demonstrated that <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT are associated with post-recurrence survival, suggesting their utility in predicting patient outcomes effectively. Future studies should focus on validating these results in a larger cohort to establish standardized protocols that leverage the prognostic capabilities of <sup>11</sup>C-CHO PET/CT imaging in managing glioma.</p><p>The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p><dl><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>PET:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Positron emission tomography</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>CT:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Computed tomography</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>\\n<sup>11</sup>C-CHO:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p><sup>11</sup>C-Choline</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>SUVmax:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Maximum standardized uptake value</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>SUVmean:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Average standardized uptake value</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>MTV:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Metabolic tumor volume</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>TLG:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Total lesion CHO uptake</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>T/N ratio:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>WHO:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>World Health Organization</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>VOI:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Volume-of-interest</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>TBR:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Tissue-background ratio</p>\\n</dd><dt style=\\\"min-width:50px;\\\"><dfn>PRS:</dfn></dt><dd>\\n<p>Post-recurrence survival</p>\\n</dd></dl><ol data-track-component=\\\"outbound reference\\\" data-track-context=\\\"references section\\\"><li data-counter=\\\"1.\\\"><p>Xu H, Zhang A, Han X, et al. ITGB2 as a prognostic indicator and a predictive marker for immunotherapy in gliomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(3):645–60.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"2.\\\"><p>Du Q, Lin Y, Zhang W, He F, Xu Y, Chen Z. Bioinformatics analysis of LMAN1 expression, clinical characteristics, and its effects on cell proliferation and invasion in glioma. Brain Res. 2022;1789:147952.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"3.\\\"><p>Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"4.\\\"><p>Vasilev A, Sofi R, Rahman R, Smith SJ, Teschemacher AG, Kasparov S. Using light for therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Brain Sci. 2020;10(2):75. Published 2020 Jan 31.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"5.\\\"><p>Roda D, Veiga P, Melo JB, Carreira IM, Ribeiro IP. Principles in the management of Glioblastoma. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(4):501. Published 2024 Apr 17.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"6.\\\"><p>Weller M, Cloughesy T, Perry JR, Wick W. Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma–are we there yet? Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(1):4–27.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"7.\\\"><p>Martín-Abreu C, Fariña-Jerónimo H, Plata-Bello J. Radiological and not clinical variables Guide the Surgical Plan in patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2024;31(4):1899–912.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"8.\\\"><p>Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):453–61.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"9.\\\"><p>Knudsen-Baas KM, Moen G, Fluge Ø, Storstein A. Pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma [published correction appears in Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;127(3):e17]. <i>Acta Neurol Scand Suppl</i>. 2013;(196):31–37.</p></li><li data-counter=\\\"10.\\\"><p>Giovannini E, Lazzeri P, Milano A, Gaeta MC, Ciarmiello A. Clinical applications of choline PET/CT in brain tumors. Curr Pharm Design. 2015;21(1):121–7.</p><p>Article CAS Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"11.\\\"><p>Alongi P, Vetrano IG, Fiasconaro E, et al. Choline-PET/CT in the Differential diagnosis between cystic Glioblastoma and Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage. Curr Radiopharm. 2019;12(1):88–92.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"12.\\\"><p>Kong Z, Jiang C, Liu D, Chen W, Ma W, Cheng X, Wang Y. Quantitative features from CHO PET distinguish the WHO grades of primary diffuse glioma. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46(2):103–10.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"13.\\\"><p>Shi Y, Liu D, Kong Z, et al. Prognostic value of Choline and other metabolites measured using 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Gliomas: a Meta-analysis and systemic review. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1219. Published 2022 Dec 5.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"14.\\\"><p>Kim S, Kim D, Kim SH, Park MA, Chang JH, Yun M. The roles of 11 C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(6):1012–20.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\\\"15.\\\"><p>Hu M, Zhu Y, Mu D, et al. Correlation of hypoxia as measured by fluorine-18 fluoroerythronitroimidazole (18F-FETNIM) PET/CT and overall survival in glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(6):1427–34.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>This study was funded by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (201802111).</p><span>Author notes</span><ol><li><p>Geng Hu and Bin Tian share the authorship.</p></li></ol><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, #1 Tongdao North Street.Huimin District, Hohhot, 010050, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China</p><p>Geng Hu, Bin Tian & Xia Bai</p></li><li><p>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic, Capital Medical University, Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China</p><p>Xiang Li</p></li><li><p>Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria</p><p>Marcus Hacker & Xiang Li</p></li><li><p>Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China</p><p>Shaoli Han & Shiwei Wang</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Geng Hu</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Bin Tian</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Shaoli Han</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Shiwei Wang</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Marcus Hacker</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Xiang Li</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Xia Bai</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Contributions</h3><p>GH: Data curation, Writing-Original draft. BT: Investigation, Writing-Original draft. SH: Formal analysis, Visualization. SW: Investigation. MH: Supervision. XL: Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing. XB: Methodology, Resources, Project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p><h3>Corresponding authors</h3><p>Correspondence to Xiang Li or Xia Bai.</p><h3>Ethical approval</h3>\\n<p>All procedures involving human participants in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University - Approval no. WZ20150014); the study protocol complied with the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki.</p>\\n<h3>Consent for publication</h3>\\n<p>Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for publication of this study and accompanying images.</p>\\n<h3>Conflict of interest</h3>\\n<p>no conflict of interest.</p>\\n<h3>Consent to participate</h3>\\n<p>Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.</p><h3>Publisher’s note</h3><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p><p>Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.</p><h3>Supplementary Material 1</h3><h3>Supplementary Material 2</h3><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.</p>\\n<p>Reprints and permissions</p><img alt=\\\"Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark\\\" height=\\\"81\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"\\\" width=\\\"57\\\"/><h3>Cite this article</h3><p>Hu, G., Tian, B., Han, S. <i>et al.</i> Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT imaging. <i>EJNMMI Res</i> <b>14</b>, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x</p><p>Download citation<svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></p><ul data-test=\\\"publication-history\\\"><li><p>Received<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2024-06-03\\\">03 June 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Accepted<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2024-08-29\\\">29 August 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Published<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2024-09-12\\\">12 September 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>DOI</abbr><span>: </span><span>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x</span></p></li></ul><h3>Share this article</h3><p>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:</p><button data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"get shareable link\\\" data-track-external=\\\"\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\" type=\\\"button\\\">Get shareable link</button><p>Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.</p><p data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"select share url\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\"></p><button data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"copy share url\\\" data-track-external=\\\"\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\" type=\\\"button\\\">Copy to clipboard</button><p> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
创作共用 "许可协议允许以任何媒介或格式进行非商业性使用、共享、分发和复制,但必须注明原作者和来源,提供 "创作共用 "许可协议的链接,并说明是否修改了许可材料。根据本许可协议,您无权分享源自本文或本文部分内容的改编材料。本文中的图片或其他第三方材料均包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中,除非在材料的信用栏中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中,且您打算使用的材料不符合法律规定或超出了许可使用范围,则您需要直接获得版权所有者的许可。如需查看该许可的副本,请访问 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.Reprints and permissionsCite this articleHu, G., Tian, B., Han, S. et al. Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through 11C-Choline PET/CT imaging.EJNMMI Res 14, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-xDownload citationReceived:03 June 2024Accepted: 29 August 2024Published: 12 September 2024DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-xShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through 11C-Choline PET/CT imaging
Glioma, a primary malignant tumor originating from glial cells, represents approximately 81% of intracranial malignant tumors. It is known for its high heterogeneity and generally poor prognosis [1,2,3]. Despite comprehensive treatment approaches, the prognosis for glioma remains grim due to its highly malignant nature [4]. Surgical intervention, primarily through routine craniotomy, has been the traditional treatment method, although it involves significant trauma and has long lacked an ideal approach. Conventional surgical treatments showed a high recurrence rate, necessitating supplementary postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy [5, 6].
Recent studies emphasize the critical role of postoperative radiotherapy, particularly intensity-modulated radiotherapy [7]. This technique offers precise targeting and dose concentration, effectively eliminating glioma while minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues [7]. Traditional imaging may lead to misinterpretations of therapeutic outcomes, such as pseudo-progression, where treatment may initially seem to worsen tumor imaging or symptoms, yet these can improve if the current treatment plan is maintained [8, 9].
Innovations in PET imaging with 11C or 18F-labeled choline (CHO) have shown promise in tumor diagnostics. CHO enters cells via high-affinity choline transporters, is phosphorylated by choline kinase, and integrated into phosphatidylcholine, reflecting the synthesis activity of the cell membrane system [10, 11]. CHO uptake is low in normal brain tissue but significantly higher in rapidly proliferating tumor cells. Several quantitative markers, such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion CHO uptake (TLG), and the tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio (T/N ratio), have proven crucial for correlating with glioma grading. These markers offer prognostic distinctions superior to those based on the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system [12, 13].
Utilizing 11C-CHO PET/CT imaging technology, type, location, and extent of tumors could be pinpointed more accurately. This method not only facilitates precise pre-surgical diagnoses and tumor boundary delineation but also provides insights into the tumor’s biological characteristics and invasiveness. Such detailed information is vital for crafting personalized treatment plans and for surgical planning, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing risks. Postoperatively, 11C-CHO PET/CT imaging is invaluable for monitoring treatment response, evaluating residual tumors, assessing recurrence risks, and improving overall prognosis [14, 15].
This pilot study retrospectively analyzed 38 patients with recurrent glioma, as determined by 11C-CHO PET/CT imaging. The findings affirm the significant prognostic value of this imaging technology in assessing glioma outcomes and offer a reliable reference for prognosis evaluations in clinical settings.
Participants
This study retrospective included participants have a histopathological confirmed diagnosis of glioma, have undergone prior treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, from January 2019 to October 2021. PET Scans were performed post-operatively and during follow-up periods for monitoring. Patients presented elevated 11C-CHO uptake were retrospective recruited. Patients’ demographic and clinical information were collected. Ethical approval was granted by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the imaging examinations. Patients with presence of brain metastases from other malignant tumors or non-glioma primary brain tumors were excluded.
PET imaging agent
The 11C-CHO agent was synthesized using a Sumitomo HM-20 S cyclotron and a GE TRACERLab FX-C chemical synthesizer, with HPLC purification by Shimadzu Corporation and TLC by Bioscan Corporation. The agent, provided by the Nuclear Medicine Department, exhibited a radioactive chemical purity of over 95%. All Participants were briefed about the procedure and signed informed consent forms before imaging.
Imaging procedure
After administering 10–15 mCi (370–555 Mbq) of 11C-CHO intravenously. A CT scan covered the skull top to base, using 140 kV, 110 mA, and a 5 mm slice thickness. PET imaging acquisition (ZOOM 2, slice thickness 5 mm) followed in three-dimensional mode within the same field of view (Biograph mCT Flow, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany) after 30–60 min. The PET images were corrected for attenuation using the CT data and then fused with the CT images.
Image analysis
The adjusted PET images were then processed using Euclid software (version1.0, Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) for tumor delineation. Images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine and CT specialists using a centralized reading approach using semi-automated 3D isocount volume-of-interest (VOI) tools to define tumor boundaries. Where necessary, a manual adjustment tool was used for slice-by-slice refinement when the automated tools failed to accurately define the tumor edges. Additionally, a reference VOI was set up in a mirror-image region to assist with tissue-background ratio (TBR) calculations. The system then automatically calculated the radioactive count for each ROI, determining the SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG values.
Clinical and survival analysis
The associations between WHO grade, IDH mutation status, and imaging parameters were analyzed. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) was defined as the time between initiating PET imaging and date of death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to study the prognostic value of PET-related parameters including SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG for PRS. The surv_cutpoint function of the survminer package in R (v0.4.9) was used to determine the optimal split point for continuous variables in the Kaplan Meier analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We have included additional analysis using Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate outcome.
The cohort consisted of 38 patients with a median age of 48 years (range: 17–71). The patients’ gliomas were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, with seven patients having grade III gliomas and nine patients having grade IV gliomas. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. SUVmean (r = 0.79), SUVmax(r = 0.78), and TLG(r = 0.49), but not MTV(r = 0.21), were significantly associated with WHO grade (P < 0.01). However, none showed a significant relationship with IDH mutation status (P > 0.05).
Clinical and survival analysis
We divided patients into two groups based on WHO grade: a high-grade group (WHO grades III and IV) and a low-grade group (WHO grades I and II). In the high-grade group, patients with lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values had more favorable survival outcomes, with TLG showing a significant correlation with prognostic risk (p = 0.019). Similarly, in the low-grade group, lower SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, or TLG values were associated with better survival outcomes. Specifically, MTV and TLG were significantly correlated with prognostic risk, with p-values of 0.034 and 0.023, respectively. (supplemental files). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed significant correlations between parameters such as the maximum SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG with the prognostic risk, whereas the MTV result did not demonstrate significant association. Figure 1 provides illustrative examples of representative patients. Notably, patients exhibiting lower SUVmax, SUVmean, or TLG values exhibited more favorable survival outcomes, with respective p-values of 0.0055, 0.011, and 0.044, as depicted in Fig. 2.
Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate the influence of various PET parameters on post-recurrence survival. The analysis revealed that lower SUVmax, SUVmean, and MTV values did not have a statistically significant association with improved survival outcomes, as indicated by hazard ratios showing a reduced risk of mortality (p value > 0.05). However, contrary to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, lower TLG values were not linked to poorer survival outcomes. (supplemental files).
The findings of this retrospective analysis reinforce the substantial prognostic value of 11C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma. By providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, this study highlights the advantages of 11C-CHO PET/CT in facilitating more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning.
11C-CHO PET/CT imaging has provided distinct advantages over traditional imaging modalities, particularly in its ability to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced changes such as pseudo-progression [8, 9]. This capability is crucial because it informs more accurate clinical decision-making and treatment planning. In this present study, by providing detailed insights into the metabolic activity of glioma cells, 11C-CHO PET/CT not only facilitates the identification and delineation of residual disease post-surgery which potentially including targeted radiotherapy, but also proves indispensable in postoperative assessments and long-term management.
The study’s findings also underscored the superior prognostic value of PET-related parameters such as SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG. The correlation of these parameters with patient survival suggests that lower SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG are associated with better survival outcomes. Interestingly, MTV did not show a significant correlation with PRS, indicating that the metabolic activity reflected by SUV and TLG might be more indicative of tumor aggressiveness than the volume measured alone.
These results have important implications for the clinical management of glioma. The ability of 11C-CHO PET/CT to provide quantitative and qualitative data enhances the WHO grading system, offering a more nuanced approach to patient stratification and personalized treatment planning. As the integration of 11C-CHO PET/CT in clinical settings continues to evolve, its potential to significantly improve patient outcomes becomes increasingly apparent. This in vivo approach ensures rigorous data collection and analysis, aiming to assess the prognostic value of 11C-CHO PET/CT imaging in glioma recurrence and to contribute significantly to personalized patient management strategies, but its short half-life limits availability to centers with on-site cyclotrons. FET PET/CT, with a longer half-life, is more accessible. However, 18F-FET may show lower uptake in low-grade gliomas, potentially underestimating residual disease.
11C-CHO PET/CT imaging is warranted in patients with suspected recurrent glioma to confirm recurrence for tailor personalized treatment plans, potentially including targeted radiotherapy based on the metabolic activity and extent of the tumor.
While the findings of this study demonstrate the substantial prognostic value of 11C-choline PET/CT imaging in managing recurrent glioma, several limitations should be acknowledged: The study is based on a relatively small sample size; larger, multicentric trials are needed. As a retrospective study, it is subject to inherent biases such as selection bias and information bias. While the study highlights the advantages of 11C-CHO PET/CT, it does not extensively compare this modality with other advanced imaging techniques such as MRI or other PET tracers.
This study demonstrated that 11C-CHO PET/CT are associated with post-recurrence survival, suggesting their utility in predicting patient outcomes effectively. Future studies should focus on validating these results in a larger cohort to establish standardized protocols that leverage the prognostic capabilities of 11C-CHO PET/CT imaging in managing glioma.
The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PET:
Positron emission tomography
CT:
Computed tomography
11C-CHO:
11C-Choline
SUVmax:
Maximum standardized uptake value
SUVmean:
Average standardized uptake value
MTV:
Metabolic tumor volume
TLG:
Total lesion CHO uptake
T/N ratio:
Tumor-to-normal contralateral cortical activity ratio
WHO:
World Health Organization
VOI:
Volume-of-interest
TBR:
Tissue-background ratio
PRS:
Post-recurrence survival
Xu H, Zhang A, Han X, et al. ITGB2 as a prognostic indicator and a predictive marker for immunotherapy in gliomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(3):645–60.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Du Q, Lin Y, Zhang W, He F, Xu Y, Chen Z. Bioinformatics analysis of LMAN1 expression, clinical characteristics, and its effects on cell proliferation and invasion in glioma. Brain Res. 2022;1789:147952.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Vasilev A, Sofi R, Rahman R, Smith SJ, Teschemacher AG, Kasparov S. Using light for therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Brain Sci. 2020;10(2):75. Published 2020 Jan 31.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Roda D, Veiga P, Melo JB, Carreira IM, Ribeiro IP. Principles in the management of Glioblastoma. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(4):501. Published 2024 Apr 17.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weller M, Cloughesy T, Perry JR, Wick W. Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma–are we there yet? Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(1):4–27.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Martín-Abreu C, Fariña-Jerónimo H, Plata-Bello J. Radiological and not clinical variables Guide the Surgical Plan in patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol. 2024;31(4):1899–912.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):453–61.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Knudsen-Baas KM, Moen G, Fluge Ø, Storstein A. Pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma [published correction appears in Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;127(3):e17]. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;(196):31–37.
Giovannini E, Lazzeri P, Milano A, Gaeta MC, Ciarmiello A. Clinical applications of choline PET/CT in brain tumors. Curr Pharm Design. 2015;21(1):121–7.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Alongi P, Vetrano IG, Fiasconaro E, et al. Choline-PET/CT in the Differential diagnosis between cystic Glioblastoma and Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage. Curr Radiopharm. 2019;12(1):88–92.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kong Z, Jiang C, Liu D, Chen W, Ma W, Cheng X, Wang Y. Quantitative features from CHO PET distinguish the WHO grades of primary diffuse glioma. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46(2):103–10.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Shi Y, Liu D, Kong Z, et al. Prognostic value of Choline and other metabolites measured using 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Gliomas: a Meta-analysis and systemic review. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1219. Published 2022 Dec 5.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim S, Kim D, Kim SH, Park MA, Chang JH, Yun M. The roles of 11 C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(6):1012–20.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hu M, Zhu Y, Mu D, et al. Correlation of hypoxia as measured by fluorine-18 fluoroerythronitroimidazole (18F-FETNIM) PET/CT and overall survival in glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(6):1427–34.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Download references
Not applicable.
This study was funded by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (201802111).
Author notes
Geng Hu and Bin Tian share the authorship.
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, #1 Tongdao North Street.Huimin District, Hohhot, 010050, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China
Geng Hu, Bin Tian & Xia Bai
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic, Capital Medical University, Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China
Xiang Li
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Marcus Hacker & Xiang Li
Evomics Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
Shaoli Han & Shiwei Wang
Authors
Geng HuView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bin TianView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shaoli HanView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shiwei WangView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Marcus HackerView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Xiang LiView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Xia BaiView author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
GH: Data curation, Writing-Original draft. BT: Investigation, Writing-Original draft. SH: Formal analysis, Visualization. SW: Investigation. MH: Supervision. XL: Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing. XB: Methodology, Resources, Project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Xiang Li or Xia Bai.
Ethical approval
All procedures involving human participants in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University - Approval no. WZ20150014); the study protocol complied with the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for publication of this study and accompanying images.
Conflict of interest
no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article
Hu, G., Tian, B., Han, S. et al. Prognostic evaluation in recurrent glioma through 11C-Choline PET/CT imaging. EJNMMI Res14, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01146-x
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
EJNMMI ResearchRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies.
The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.