智障法医病人的创伤和逆境:风险评估报告回顾

Adrian Ierna, Heather Tolland, Abi McGinley, Laura Mathieson
{"title":"智障法医病人的创伤和逆境:风险评估报告回顾","authors":"Adrian Ierna, Heather Tolland, Abi McGinley, Laura Mathieson","doi":"10.1108/jidob-08-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>People with intellectual disabilities are at a significantly higher risk than the general population for experiencing a wide range of adverse and potentially traumatic events. This paper aims to explore the incidence of experiences of lifetime trauma across this population in one Forensic Intellectual Disability Service. Risk management recommendations and psychological risk formulations were also examined for their consideration of traumatic experiences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Risk assessment reports (<em>n</em> = 39) were reviewed for evidence of traumatic experiences and the consideration of trauma in patient risk formulations and risk management treatment recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Trauma was rated as present or partially present in 84.6% (<em>n</em> = 33) of risk assessment reports reviewed. None of the patients had received a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. Recommendations regarding trauma were identified in 39.4% (<em>n</em> = 13) of the risk assessment reports where trauma was rated either “present” or “partially present”.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Findings suggest a need for diagnostic tools to be used to measure trauma symptoms and potential cases of PTSD to best support needs of patients. Trauma-focused interventions should also be considered. Further investigation is needed to clarify the disparity between the consideration of trauma in formulations and treatment recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study highlights the different traumatic experiences that forensic patients across three settings have been exposed to during their lifetimes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Ierna, Heather Tolland, Abi McGinley, Laura Mathieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jidob-08-2023-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>People with intellectual disabilities are at a significantly higher risk than the general population for experiencing a wide range of adverse and potentially traumatic events. This paper aims to explore the incidence of experiences of lifetime trauma across this population in one Forensic Intellectual Disability Service. Risk management recommendations and psychological risk formulations were also examined for their consideration of traumatic experiences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Risk assessment reports (<em>n</em> = 39) were reviewed for evidence of traumatic experiences and the consideration of trauma in patient risk formulations and risk management treatment recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Trauma was rated as present or partially present in 84.6% (<em>n</em> = 33) of risk assessment reports reviewed. None of the patients had received a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. Recommendations regarding trauma were identified in 39.4% (<em>n</em> = 13) of the risk assessment reports where trauma was rated either “present” or “partially present”.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Findings suggest a need for diagnostic tools to be used to measure trauma symptoms and potential cases of PTSD to best support needs of patients. Trauma-focused interventions should also be considered. Further investigation is needed to clarify the disparity between the consideration of trauma in formulations and treatment recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study highlights the different traumatic experiences that forensic patients across three settings have been exposed to during their lifetimes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":43468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-08-2023-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-08-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的智障人士经历各种不利和潜在创伤事件的风险明显高于普通人群。本文旨在探讨一个智障法医服务机构的智障人士一生中经历创伤的发生率。本文还研究了风险管理建议和心理风险制定中对创伤经历的考虑。研究结果84.6%的风险评估报告(n = 33)将创伤评定为存在或部分存在。没有一名患者被诊断为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。在39.4%(n=13)的风险评估报告中,心理创伤被评为 "存在 "或 "部分存在",这些报告提出了有关心理创伤的建议。此外,还应考虑采取以创伤为重点的干预措施。需要进一步调查,以澄清在治疗方案和治疗建议中对创伤的考虑之间存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports

Purpose

People with intellectual disabilities are at a significantly higher risk than the general population for experiencing a wide range of adverse and potentially traumatic events. This paper aims to explore the incidence of experiences of lifetime trauma across this population in one Forensic Intellectual Disability Service. Risk management recommendations and psychological risk formulations were also examined for their consideration of traumatic experiences.

Design/methodology/approach

Risk assessment reports (n = 39) were reviewed for evidence of traumatic experiences and the consideration of trauma in patient risk formulations and risk management treatment recommendations.

Findings

Trauma was rated as present or partially present in 84.6% (n = 33) of risk assessment reports reviewed. None of the patients had received a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. Recommendations regarding trauma were identified in 39.4% (n = 13) of the risk assessment reports where trauma was rated either “present” or “partially present”.

Practical implications

Findings suggest a need for diagnostic tools to be used to measure trauma symptoms and potential cases of PTSD to best support needs of patients. Trauma-focused interventions should also be considered. Further investigation is needed to clarify the disparity between the consideration of trauma in formulations and treatment recommendations.

Originality/value

This study highlights the different traumatic experiences that forensic patients across three settings have been exposed to during their lifetimes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye Demographic, forensic and service involvement characteristics related to adults referred to a community-based learning disability forensic team pre- and post-COVID-19 The relationship between institutional climate and constructive deviance A feasibility study to identify the presence of autism specific risk factors in secure services using an autism specific framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1