术后持续使用阿片类药物的风险因素:有别于慢性术后疼痛的一个实体

Sama Ramo, Stephan Frangakis, Jennifer F Waljee, Mark C Bicket
{"title":"术后持续使用阿片类药物的风险因素:有别于慢性术后疼痛的一个实体","authors":"Sama Ramo, Stephan Frangakis, Jennifer F Waljee, Mark C Bicket","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a decline in opioid prescriptions over the past decade, patients commonly receive opioid analgesics as a treatment for postoperative pain in the USA. One complication that patients may experience after surgery is persistent postoperative opioid use (PPOU), or opioid use beyond the typical recovery period. Often defined as beyond 3 months postsurgery, PPOU is frequently conflated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), where pain persists well after the expected healing time following surgery. This narrative review explores the distinct risk factors for each condition, their interrelation, and potential future research directions. For PPOU, major risk factors include the risky use of substances including misuse and use disorders; depression and other mental health disorders; a history of chronic pain before surgery including back pain; and certain surgical types (ie, total knee arthropathy, open cholecystectomy, total hip arthropathy). Conversely, CPSP risk factors include the type of surgery (ie, thoracic and breast surgeries), mental health conditions (particularly catastrophizing), and pain in both the preoperative and postoperative phases. Despite the overlap of some factors, studies typically employ different frameworks when examining PPOU and CPSP, with a biopsychosocial model applied for CPSP and little emphasis on an individual’s social environment employed for PPOU. Additionally, existing studies predominantly rely on retrospective insurance claims data, which may not capture the full scope of risk factors. To fill gaps in understanding, investigations may prospectively assess and analyze patient-reported outcomes, implement similar frameworks, and concurrently measure both conditions to advance the scientific understanding of PPOU and CPSP. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use: an entity distinct from chronic postsurgical pain\",\"authors\":\"Sama Ramo, Stephan Frangakis, Jennifer F Waljee, Mark C Bicket\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite a decline in opioid prescriptions over the past decade, patients commonly receive opioid analgesics as a treatment for postoperative pain in the USA. One complication that patients may experience after surgery is persistent postoperative opioid use (PPOU), or opioid use beyond the typical recovery period. Often defined as beyond 3 months postsurgery, PPOU is frequently conflated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), where pain persists well after the expected healing time following surgery. This narrative review explores the distinct risk factors for each condition, their interrelation, and potential future research directions. For PPOU, major risk factors include the risky use of substances including misuse and use disorders; depression and other mental health disorders; a history of chronic pain before surgery including back pain; and certain surgical types (ie, total knee arthropathy, open cholecystectomy, total hip arthropathy). Conversely, CPSP risk factors include the type of surgery (ie, thoracic and breast surgeries), mental health conditions (particularly catastrophizing), and pain in both the preoperative and postoperative phases. Despite the overlap of some factors, studies typically employ different frameworks when examining PPOU and CPSP, with a biopsychosocial model applied for CPSP and little emphasis on an individual’s social environment employed for PPOU. Additionally, existing studies predominantly rely on retrospective insurance claims data, which may not capture the full scope of risk factors. To fill gaps in understanding, investigations may prospectively assess and analyze patient-reported outcomes, implement similar frameworks, and concurrently measure both conditions to advance the scientific understanding of PPOU and CPSP. No data are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管阿片类药物的处方量在过去十年中有所下降,但在美国,患者通常还是会接受阿片类镇痛药来治疗术后疼痛。患者术后可能出现的一种并发症是术后阿片类药物的持续使用(PPOU),或者说阿片类药物的使用超过了典型的恢复期。PPOU 通常被定义为术后 3 个月以上,经常与慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)相混淆,后者是指术后疼痛在预期愈合时间后仍持续存在。这篇叙述性综述探讨了每种情况的不同风险因素、它们之间的相互关系以及未来潜在的研究方向。就 PPOU 而言,主要风险因素包括药物的危险使用,包括滥用和使用障碍;抑郁症和其他精神疾病;手术前的慢性疼痛史,包括背痛;以及某些手术类型(即全膝关节病、开放性胆囊切除术、全髋关节病)。相反,CPSP 风险因素包括手术类型(即胸部和乳房手术)、精神健康状况(尤其是灾难化)以及术前和术后疼痛。尽管某些因素存在重叠,但在研究 PPOU 和 CPSP 时,研究通常采用不同的框架,CPSP 采用生物心理社会模型,而 PPOU 很少强调个人的社会环境。此外,现有研究主要依赖于回顾性保险理赔数据,这可能无法捕捉到全部风险因素。为了填补认识上的空白,调查可以对患者报告的结果进行前瞻性评估和分析,实施类似的框架,并同时测量两种情况,以促进对 PPOU 和 CPSP 的科学认识。暂无数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use: an entity distinct from chronic postsurgical pain
Despite a decline in opioid prescriptions over the past decade, patients commonly receive opioid analgesics as a treatment for postoperative pain in the USA. One complication that patients may experience after surgery is persistent postoperative opioid use (PPOU), or opioid use beyond the typical recovery period. Often defined as beyond 3 months postsurgery, PPOU is frequently conflated with chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), where pain persists well after the expected healing time following surgery. This narrative review explores the distinct risk factors for each condition, their interrelation, and potential future research directions. For PPOU, major risk factors include the risky use of substances including misuse and use disorders; depression and other mental health disorders; a history of chronic pain before surgery including back pain; and certain surgical types (ie, total knee arthropathy, open cholecystectomy, total hip arthropathy). Conversely, CPSP risk factors include the type of surgery (ie, thoracic and breast surgeries), mental health conditions (particularly catastrophizing), and pain in both the preoperative and postoperative phases. Despite the overlap of some factors, studies typically employ different frameworks when examining PPOU and CPSP, with a biopsychosocial model applied for CPSP and little emphasis on an individual’s social environment employed for PPOU. Additionally, existing studies predominantly rely on retrospective insurance claims data, which may not capture the full scope of risk factors. To fill gaps in understanding, investigations may prospectively assess and analyze patient-reported outcomes, implement similar frameworks, and concurrently measure both conditions to advance the scientific understanding of PPOU and CPSP. No data are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1