尸体研究需要技术和成像之间的准确性和一致性:我们是否错过了 "靶心"?

Mauricio Forero, Alvaro Diaz Rodriguez, Rami Adel Kamel
{"title":"尸体研究需要技术和成像之间的准确性和一致性:我们是否错过了 \"靶心\"?","authors":"Mauricio Forero, Alvaro Diaz Rodriguez, Rami Adel Kamel","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have read with interest the article by Luchsinger et al ,[1][1] investigating the spread of 20 mL of injectate after the performance of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the T9 level in cadavers. Lingering doubts need to be clarified. The study concludes that the ventral rami were not","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the need for accuracy and consistency in cadaveric studies between technique and imaging: are we missing “bull’s eye”?\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Forero, Alvaro Diaz Rodriguez, Rami Adel Kamel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have read with interest the article by Luchsinger et al ,[1][1] investigating the spread of 20 mL of injectate after the performance of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the T9 level in cadavers. Lingering doubts need to be clarified. The study concludes that the ventral rami were not\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Luchsinger 等人的文章,[1][1] 研究了在尸体 T9 水平进行竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)后 20 毫升注射液的扩散情况。尚存在的疑问有待澄清。该研究得出结论,腹侧韧带并没有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the need for accuracy and consistency in cadaveric studies between technique and imaging: are we missing “bull’s eye”?
We have read with interest the article by Luchsinger et al ,[1][1] investigating the spread of 20 mL of injectate after the performance of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the T9 level in cadavers. Lingering doubts need to be clarified. The study concludes that the ventral rami were not
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1