Lauren Daley, Prabhjyot Saini, Harrison Watters, Yasmine Bassil, Eric Schumacher, Lynn Marie Trotti, Shella Keilholz
{"title":"睡眠障碍患者的功能连接和时空动态变化","authors":"Lauren Daley, Prabhjyot Saini, Harrison Watters, Yasmine Bassil, Eric Schumacher, Lynn Marie Trotti, Shella Keilholz","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.28.610147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a sleep disorder characterized by highly disruptive symptoms. Like narcolepsy type 1, a well-characterized sleep disorder, individuals with IH suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness, though there is little overlap in metabolic or neural biomarkers across these two disorders. This lack of common pathophysiology, combined with the clear overlap in symptoms presents an ideal paradigm for better understanding the impact of IH on an individual's functional activity and organization, and potentially, the underlying pathophysiology. This study examines the observed functional connectivity in patients with IH, and patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against healthy control individuals. Static functional connectivity is compared, as are quasi-periodic patterns, acquired from the BOLD timecourse, for all groups. In addition to baseline data comparison, the study also included a post-nap condition, where the individuals included in this analysis napped for at least 10 minutes prior to the scanning session, to explore why individuals with IH do not feel refreshed after a nap like individuals with NT1 do. Assessing the groups' spatiotemporal patterns revealed key differences across both disorders and conditions: static connectivity revealed at baseline higher subcortical connectivity in the NT1 group. There was also observably less connectivity in the IH group both at baseline and post-nap, though none of these static analyses survived multiple comparisons correction to reach significance. The QPP results however found significant differences in the IH group in key networks, particularly the DAN/FPCN correlation is significantly different at baseline vs. post-nap, a trend not observed in either the control or NT1 groups. The DAN and FPCN are drastically altered both at baseline and post-nap when compared to the other groups, and may likely be a disorder-specific result. This study demonstrates that key networks for arousal are more heavily disrupted in IH patients, who are less affected by a nap, confirmed through both subject reporting and functional evidence through spatiotemporal patterns.","PeriodicalId":501471,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Pathology","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered functional connectivity and spatiotemporal dynamics in individuals with sleep disorders\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Daley, Prabhjyot Saini, Harrison Watters, Yasmine Bassil, Eric Schumacher, Lynn Marie Trotti, Shella Keilholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.28.610147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a sleep disorder characterized by highly disruptive symptoms. Like narcolepsy type 1, a well-characterized sleep disorder, individuals with IH suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness, though there is little overlap in metabolic or neural biomarkers across these two disorders. This lack of common pathophysiology, combined with the clear overlap in symptoms presents an ideal paradigm for better understanding the impact of IH on an individual's functional activity and organization, and potentially, the underlying pathophysiology. This study examines the observed functional connectivity in patients with IH, and patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against healthy control individuals. Static functional connectivity is compared, as are quasi-periodic patterns, acquired from the BOLD timecourse, for all groups. In addition to baseline data comparison, the study also included a post-nap condition, where the individuals included in this analysis napped for at least 10 minutes prior to the scanning session, to explore why individuals with IH do not feel refreshed after a nap like individuals with NT1 do. Assessing the groups' spatiotemporal patterns revealed key differences across both disorders and conditions: static connectivity revealed at baseline higher subcortical connectivity in the NT1 group. There was also observably less connectivity in the IH group both at baseline and post-nap, though none of these static analyses survived multiple comparisons correction to reach significance. The QPP results however found significant differences in the IH group in key networks, particularly the DAN/FPCN correlation is significantly different at baseline vs. post-nap, a trend not observed in either the control or NT1 groups. The DAN and FPCN are drastically altered both at baseline and post-nap when compared to the other groups, and may likely be a disorder-specific result. This study demonstrates that key networks for arousal are more heavily disrupted in IH patients, who are less affected by a nap, confirmed through both subject reporting and functional evidence through spatiotemporal patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Pathology\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.610147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.610147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
特发性嗜睡症(IH)是一种以高度破坏性症状为特征的睡眠障碍。与嗜睡症 1 型(一种特征明显的睡眠障碍)一样,IH 患者也会白天过度嗜睡,但这两种疾病的代谢或神经生物标志物几乎没有重叠。这种缺乏共同病理生理学的现象,再加上症状的明显重叠,为更好地了解 IH 对个体功能活动和组织的影响,以及潜在的病理生理学提供了一个理想的范例。本研究观察了 IH 患者和 1 型嗜睡症(NT1)患者与健康对照者之间的功能连接。对所有组别的静态功能连通性以及从 BOLD 时间序列获得的准周期模式进行了比较。除了基线数据比较外,研究还包括小睡后条件,即分析对象在扫描前至少小睡 10 分钟,以探索为什么 IH 患者在小睡后不会像 NT1 患者那样感到精神焕发。对各组的时空模式进行评估后发现,这两种疾病和情况之间存在关键差异:静态连通性显示,NT1 组的基线皮层下连通性较高。IH 组在基线和小睡后的连通性也明显较低,不过这些静态分析都没有经过多重比较校正,没有达到显著性。然而,QPP 结果发现,IH 组在关键网络中存在显著差异,尤其是 DAN/FPCN 相关性在基线与小睡后存在显著差异,而这一趋势在对照组或 NT1 组均未观察到。与其他组相比,DAN 和 FPCN 在基线和小睡后都发生了巨大变化,这可能是失调症的特异性结果。这项研究通过受试者的报告和时空模式的功能证据证实,唤醒关键网络在 IH 患者中受到的干扰更严重,而小睡对他们的影响较小。
Altered functional connectivity and spatiotemporal dynamics in individuals with sleep disorders
Idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a sleep disorder characterized by highly disruptive symptoms. Like narcolepsy type 1, a well-characterized sleep disorder, individuals with IH suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness, though there is little overlap in metabolic or neural biomarkers across these two disorders. This lack of common pathophysiology, combined with the clear overlap in symptoms presents an ideal paradigm for better understanding the impact of IH on an individual's functional activity and organization, and potentially, the underlying pathophysiology. This study examines the observed functional connectivity in patients with IH, and patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against healthy control individuals. Static functional connectivity is compared, as are quasi-periodic patterns, acquired from the BOLD timecourse, for all groups. In addition to baseline data comparison, the study also included a post-nap condition, where the individuals included in this analysis napped for at least 10 minutes prior to the scanning session, to explore why individuals with IH do not feel refreshed after a nap like individuals with NT1 do. Assessing the groups' spatiotemporal patterns revealed key differences across both disorders and conditions: static connectivity revealed at baseline higher subcortical connectivity in the NT1 group. There was also observably less connectivity in the IH group both at baseline and post-nap, though none of these static analyses survived multiple comparisons correction to reach significance. The QPP results however found significant differences in the IH group in key networks, particularly the DAN/FPCN correlation is significantly different at baseline vs. post-nap, a trend not observed in either the control or NT1 groups. The DAN and FPCN are drastically altered both at baseline and post-nap when compared to the other groups, and may likely be a disorder-specific result. This study demonstrates that key networks for arousal are more heavily disrupted in IH patients, who are less affected by a nap, confirmed through both subject reporting and functional evidence through spatiotemporal patterns.