Seyda Öney, Moataz Abdelaal, Kuno Kurzhals, Paul Betz, Cordula Kropp, Daniel Weiskopf
{"title":"测试测试:评估领域专家可视化素养时的观察结果","authors":"Seyda Öney, Moataz Abdelaal, Kuno Kurzhals, Paul Betz, Cordula Kropp, Daniel Weiskopf","doi":"arxiv-2409.08101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization\nliteracy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is\nnot taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation\nwhere participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is\nespecially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We\nconducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the\nMini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our\nparticipants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the\nquestions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly\nhad an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to\nthe test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could\nbe integrated into existing evaluation procedures.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts\",\"authors\":\"Seyda Öney, Moataz Abdelaal, Kuno Kurzhals, Paul Betz, Cordula Kropp, Daniel Weiskopf\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization\\nliteracy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is\\nnot taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation\\nwhere participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is\\nespecially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We\\nconducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the\\nMini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our\\nparticipants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the\\nquestions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly\\nhad an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to\\nthe test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could\\nbe integrated into existing evaluation procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing the Test: Observations When Assessing Visualization Literacy of Domain Experts
Various standardized tests exist that assess individuals' visualization
literacy. Their use can help to draw conclusions from studies. However, it is
not taken into account that the test itself can create a pressure situation
where participants might fear being exposed and assessed negatively. This is
especially problematic when testing domain experts in design studies. We
conducted interviews with experts from different domains performing the
Mini-VLAT test for visualization literacy to identify potential problems. Our
participants reported that the time limit per question, ambiguities in the
questions and visualizations, and missing steps in the test procedure mainly
had an impact on their performance and content. We discuss possible changes to
the test design to address these issues and how such assessment methods could
be integrated into existing evaluation procedures.