滑膜对齐对瓣上自扩张经导管主动脉瓣血液动力学性能的影响

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31201
Ignacio J. Amat-Santos MD, PhD, FESC, Javier Gómez-Herrero MD, Pablo Pinon MD, Luis Nombela-Franco MD, PhD, Raúl Moreno MD, PhD, Antonio J. Munoz-García MD, Alfredo Redondo MD, Antonio Gómez-Menchero MD, PhD, Itziar Gómez-Salvador MD, J. Alberto San Román MD, PhD
{"title":"滑膜对齐对瓣上自扩张经导管主动脉瓣血液动力学性能的影响","authors":"Ignacio J. Amat-Santos MD, PhD, FESC,&nbsp;Javier Gómez-Herrero MD,&nbsp;Pablo Pinon MD,&nbsp;Luis Nombela-Franco MD, PhD,&nbsp;Raúl Moreno MD, PhD,&nbsp;Antonio J. Munoz-García MD,&nbsp;Alfredo Redondo MD,&nbsp;Antonio Gómez-Menchero MD, PhD,&nbsp;Itziar Gómez-Salvador MD,&nbsp;J. Alberto San Román MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hemodynamic impact of commissural alignment (CA) with self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves (TAVR) has not been investigated yet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To determine hemodynamic impact of CA with self-expandable TAVR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multicentric ambispective study comparing patients who underwent self-expandable TAVR in seven centers with the Evolut Pro/Pro+ (EP) (Medtronic) and Acurate neo2 (AN2) (Boston Scientific) with and without CA strategies. The degree of commissural misalignment (CMA) was assessed by computed tomography/angiography and 1-year transvalvular gradients/regurgitation evaluated by echocardiography. A matched comparison according to annular dimensions/eccentricity, prosthesis size/type, and baseline left ventricular function and gradients was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 557 patients, mean age 80.7 ± 6.6 years, 61.4% men, and STS score of 4.3 ± 3.1% were analyzed. A CA technique was attempted in 215 patients (38.6%), including 113 patients with AN2 and 102 patients with EP. None/mild CMA was found in 158 (73.5% vs. 43.6% if no CA attempted, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with no differences between devices (AN2:75.2%; EP:71.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.545). Patients with moderate/severe CMA had a greater aortic peak gradient (22.3 ± 8.7 vs. 19.7 ± 8.5, <i>p</i> = 0.001), significantly greater progression of both peak (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and mean gradients (<i>p</i> = 0.001) after matching, and higher rate of central aortic regurgitation (1.2% vs. 0.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) at 1-year, but not a greater proportion of patients with mean gradient ≥ 10 mmHg.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of CA strategies significantly reduced the rate of CMA for the self-expandable TAVR devices ACN2 and EP which was associated to lower transvalvular gradients and intra-prosthetic regurgitation progression at 1-year although no criteria of structural deterioration were met at this follow up. Clinicaltrials.org: NCT05097183.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 5","pages":"1060-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of commissural alignment on the hemodynamic performance of supra-annular self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio J. Amat-Santos MD, PhD, FESC,&nbsp;Javier Gómez-Herrero MD,&nbsp;Pablo Pinon MD,&nbsp;Luis Nombela-Franco MD, PhD,&nbsp;Raúl Moreno MD, PhD,&nbsp;Antonio J. Munoz-García MD,&nbsp;Alfredo Redondo MD,&nbsp;Antonio Gómez-Menchero MD, PhD,&nbsp;Itziar Gómez-Salvador MD,&nbsp;J. Alberto San Román MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hemodynamic impact of commissural alignment (CA) with self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves (TAVR) has not been investigated yet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine hemodynamic impact of CA with self-expandable TAVR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multicentric ambispective study comparing patients who underwent self-expandable TAVR in seven centers with the Evolut Pro/Pro+ (EP) (Medtronic) and Acurate neo2 (AN2) (Boston Scientific) with and without CA strategies. The degree of commissural misalignment (CMA) was assessed by computed tomography/angiography and 1-year transvalvular gradients/regurgitation evaluated by echocardiography. A matched comparison according to annular dimensions/eccentricity, prosthesis size/type, and baseline left ventricular function and gradients was performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 557 patients, mean age 80.7 ± 6.6 years, 61.4% men, and STS score of 4.3 ± 3.1% were analyzed. A CA technique was attempted in 215 patients (38.6%), including 113 patients with AN2 and 102 patients with EP. None/mild CMA was found in 158 (73.5% vs. 43.6% if no CA attempted, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with no differences between devices (AN2:75.2%; EP:71.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.545). Patients with moderate/severe CMA had a greater aortic peak gradient (22.3 ± 8.7 vs. 19.7 ± 8.5, <i>p</i> = 0.001), significantly greater progression of both peak (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and mean gradients (<i>p</i> = 0.001) after matching, and higher rate of central aortic regurgitation (1.2% vs. 0.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005) at 1-year, but not a greater proportion of patients with mean gradient ≥ 10 mmHg.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of CA strategies significantly reduced the rate of CMA for the self-expandable TAVR devices ACN2 and EP which was associated to lower transvalvular gradients and intra-prosthetic regurgitation progression at 1-year although no criteria of structural deterioration were met at this follow up. Clinicaltrials.org: NCT05097183.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"1060-1070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尚未研究自体可扩张经导管主动脉瓣(TAVR)的滑膜对位(CA)对血流动力学的影响。方法多中心前瞻性研究比较了在七个中心接受自体可扩张TAVR的患者,他们分别使用了Evolut Pro/Pro+ (EP) (Medtronic) 和Acurate neo2 (AN2) (Boston Scientific),使用和不使用CA策略。通过计算机断层扫描/血管造影评估了滑膜错位(CMA)程度,并通过超声心动图评估了1年的跨瓣梯度/反流情况。根据瓣环尺寸/偏心、假体尺寸/类型、基线左心室功能和瓣坡进行了配对比较。结果 共分析了557例患者,平均年龄(80.7 ± 6.6)岁,61.4%为男性,STS评分(4.3 ± 3.1%)。215名患者(38.6%)尝试了CA技术,其中包括113名AN2患者和102名EP患者。158例患者(73.5% 对未尝试 CA 的 43.6%,p < 0.001)未发现/轻度 CMA,不同设备之间无差异(AN2:75.2%;EP:71.6%,p = 0.545)。中度/重度 CMA 患者的主动脉峰值梯度更大(22.3 ± 8.7 vs. 19.7 ± 8.5,p = 0.001),匹配后峰值梯度(p = 0.002)和平均梯度(p = 0.001)的进展显著更大,1 年后中央主动脉瓣反流率更高(1.2% vs. 0.4%,p = 0.005),但平均梯度≥ 10 mmHg 的患者比例并不更高。结论 CA策略的使用显著降低了自扩张TAVR器械ACN2和EP的CMA发生率,这与1年后较低的跨瓣梯度和假体内反流进展有关,尽管在此次随访中未达到结构恶化的标准。临床试验网(Clinicaltrials.org):NCT05097183。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of commissural alignment on the hemodynamic performance of supra-annular self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves

Background

Hemodynamic impact of commissural alignment (CA) with self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves (TAVR) has not been investigated yet.

Aims

To determine hemodynamic impact of CA with self-expandable TAVR.

Methods

Multicentric ambispective study comparing patients who underwent self-expandable TAVR in seven centers with the Evolut Pro/Pro+ (EP) (Medtronic) and Acurate neo2 (AN2) (Boston Scientific) with and without CA strategies. The degree of commissural misalignment (CMA) was assessed by computed tomography/angiography and 1-year transvalvular gradients/regurgitation evaluated by echocardiography. A matched comparison according to annular dimensions/eccentricity, prosthesis size/type, and baseline left ventricular function and gradients was performed.

Results

A total of 557 patients, mean age 80.7 ± 6.6 years, 61.4% men, and STS score of 4.3 ± 3.1% were analyzed. A CA technique was attempted in 215 patients (38.6%), including 113 patients with AN2 and 102 patients with EP. None/mild CMA was found in 158 (73.5% vs. 43.6% if no CA attempted, p < 0.001) with no differences between devices (AN2:75.2%; EP:71.6%, p = 0.545). Patients with moderate/severe CMA had a greater aortic peak gradient (22.3 ± 8.7 vs. 19.7 ± 8.5, p = 0.001), significantly greater progression of both peak (p = 0.002) and mean gradients (p = 0.001) after matching, and higher rate of central aortic regurgitation (1.2% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.005) at 1-year, but not a greater proportion of patients with mean gradient ≥ 10 mmHg.

Conclusions

The use of CA strategies significantly reduced the rate of CMA for the self-expandable TAVR devices ACN2 and EP which was associated to lower transvalvular gradients and intra-prosthetic regurgitation progression at 1-year although no criteria of structural deterioration were met at this follow up. Clinicaltrials.org: NCT05097183.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a Fully Angiography-Derived Versus a Hybrid of Angiography and Pressure-Wire-Derived Approach to Assess Coronary Microvascular Resistance: The Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction Hybrid (OxAMI-HYBRID) Study. Intravascular Lithotripsy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Procedural and One-Year Clinical Outcomes From the BENELUX-IVL Registry. Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study. Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post Myocardial Infarct Ventricular Septal Rupture After Surgical Patch Dehiscence. Acute Stent Thrombosis Following Reprotrusion of a Calcified Nodule in the Left Main Coronary Artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1