新辅助免疫化疗对可切除I-III期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析

Bo li, Yujia Gu, Weixing Zhao, Zirui Li, Wanjing Guo, Xinxin Lu, Jun Jiang
{"title":"新辅助免疫化疗对可切除I-III期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Bo li, Yujia Gu, Weixing Zhao, Zirui Li, Wanjing Guo, Xinxin Lu, Jun Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03704-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05–2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05–268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28–0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00–1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68–1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65–1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61–1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":10166,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bo li, Yujia Gu, Weixing Zhao, Zirui Li, Wanjing Guo, Xinxin Lu, Jun Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03704-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05–2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05–268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28–0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00–1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68–1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65–1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61–1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03704-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03704-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景新辅助免疫化疗(NICT)是一种治疗可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的新方法。方法我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和国际会议上搜索了将NICT与新辅助化疗(NCT)进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果纳入了3387名患者、六种治疗组合和两种模式的研究。Meta分析表明,NICT的pCR和EFS率高于NCT。托利帕利单抗-化疗组合的手术切除率(OR = 1.68,95% CI:1.05-2.73)、pCR(OR = 38.84,95% CI:11.05-268.19)和EFS(HR = 0.40,95% CI:0.28-0.58)最高。对于PD-L1高表达和NSCLC患者,新辅助nivolumab联合化疗的疗效最好。治疗相关不良事件的发生率随着治疗周期的延长而增加,围手术期nivolumab联合化疗的安全性最差(RR=1.32,95% CI:1.00-1.76),而新辅助nivolumab单独联合化疗的安全性最好(RR=0.91,95% CI:0.68-1.21)。间接比较显示,新辅助-辅助免疫疗法没有生存获益(HR = 0.93,95% CI:0.65-1.35)。在两种免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的间接比较中,虽然EFS没有显著差异(HR=0.81,95% CI:0.61-1.08),但PD-1抑制剂仍可能是最有效的治疗方案。最佳治疗组合通常是托瑞帕单抗和化疗。建议根据 PD-L1 表达和病理类型进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment.

Methods

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results

RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05–2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05–268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28–0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00–1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68–1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65–1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61–1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option.

Conclusions

NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
lncSNHG16 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma development by inhibiting autophagy Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary malignancy and associations between peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and clinical outcomes Emerging immunologic approaches as cancer anti-angiogenic therapies Safety profile of trastuzumab originator vs biosimilars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Construction and clinical significance of prognostic risk markers based on cancer driver genes in lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1