评估冷冻档案 DNA 样品完整性的新方法:短线程和长线程 16S rRNA 基因序列的阿尔法多样性比率

IF 6.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Methods in Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/2041-210x.14411
K. M. Sumby, J. R. Stephen, J. J. Austin, R. K. Schilling, T. R. Cavagnaro
{"title":"评估冷冻档案 DNA 样品完整性的新方法:短线程和长线程 16S rRNA 基因序列的阿尔法多样性比率","authors":"K. M. Sumby, J. R. Stephen, J. J. Austin, R. K. Schilling, T. R. Cavagnaro","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.14411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Archival DNA samples collected and analysed for a range of research and applied questions have accumulated in the laboratories of universities, government agencies and commercial service providers for decades. These DNA archives represent a valuable, yet largely un‐tapped repository of genomic information. With lowering costs of, and increasing access to, high‐throughput sequencing, we predict an increase in retrospective research to explore the wealth of information that resides in these archival samples. However, for this to occur, we need confidence in the integrity of the DNA samples, often stored under suboptimal conditions and their fitness of purpose for downstream genomic analysis.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we borrow from a well‐established concept in ancient DNA to evaluate sample integrity, defined as loss of information content in recovered amplicons, of frozen DNA samples and based on the ratio of ⍺‐diversity of short‐ and long‐read 16S rRNA gene sequences.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The 16S rRNA variable region of 87 stored DNA samples, extracted from soil, collected from western and southern agricultural regions of Australia between 2001 and 2021 were sequenced using both PacBio full length reads (V1–V9, 1.5 kbp) and Illumina short‐reads (V3–V4, 200–450 bp). When ⍺‐diversity ratios were calculated between the long and short reads to assess DNA degradation, the ratio of ⍺‐diversity did not decrease in older samples versus younger samples.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We suggest this as a novel method to confirm integrity of DNA before embarking on large‐scale diversity profiling projects using archival DNA.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":208,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel method to assess the integrity of frozen archival DNA samples: Alpha‐diversity ratios of short‐ and long‐read 16S rRNA gene sequences\",\"authors\":\"K. M. Sumby, J. R. Stephen, J. J. Austin, R. K. Schilling, T. R. Cavagnaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2041-210x.14411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Archival DNA samples collected and analysed for a range of research and applied questions have accumulated in the laboratories of universities, government agencies and commercial service providers for decades. These DNA archives represent a valuable, yet largely un‐tapped repository of genomic information. With lowering costs of, and increasing access to, high‐throughput sequencing, we predict an increase in retrospective research to explore the wealth of information that resides in these archival samples. However, for this to occur, we need confidence in the integrity of the DNA samples, often stored under suboptimal conditions and their fitness of purpose for downstream genomic analysis.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we borrow from a well‐established concept in ancient DNA to evaluate sample integrity, defined as loss of information content in recovered amplicons, of frozen DNA samples and based on the ratio of ⍺‐diversity of short‐ and long‐read 16S rRNA gene sequences.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The 16S rRNA variable region of 87 stored DNA samples, extracted from soil, collected from western and southern agricultural regions of Australia between 2001 and 2021 were sequenced using both PacBio full length reads (V1–V9, 1.5 kbp) and Illumina short‐reads (V3–V4, 200–450 bp). When ⍺‐diversity ratios were calculated between the long and short reads to assess DNA degradation, the ratio of ⍺‐diversity did not decrease in older samples versus younger samples.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We suggest this as a novel method to confirm integrity of DNA before embarking on large‐scale diversity profiling projects using archival DNA.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,在大学、政府机构和商业服务提供商的实验室中积累了为一系列研究和应用问题收集和分析的 DNA 档案样本。这些 DNA 档案是宝贵的基因组信息库,但在很大程度上尚未得到开发利用。随着高通量测序成本的降低和获取途径的增加,我们预测回溯性研究将会增加,以探索这些档案样本中蕴藏的丰富信息。然而,要做到这一点,我们需要对 DNA 样本的完整性有信心,因为这些样本通常是在不理想的条件下保存的,而且它们也不适合用于下游基因组分析。在此,我们借鉴古 DNA 中一个成熟的概念来评估样本的完整性,即冷冻 DNA 样本中恢复的扩增子信息含量的损失,并基于短线程和长线程 16S rRNA 基因序列的⍺-多样性比率。使用 PacBio 全长读数(V1-V9,1.5 kbp)和 Illumina 短读数(V3-V4,200-450 bp)对 2001 年至 2021 年期间从澳大利亚西部和南部农业区采集的 87 个从土壤中提取的储存 DNA 样本的 16S rRNA 可变区进行测序。当计算长读码和短读码的多样性比值以评估DNA降解情况时,年龄较大的样本与年龄较小的样本相比,多样性比值并没有降低。我们建议将此作为一种新方法,在利用档案 DNA 开展大规模多样性分析项目之前确认 DNA 的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel method to assess the integrity of frozen archival DNA samples: Alpha‐diversity ratios of short‐ and long‐read 16S rRNA gene sequences
Archival DNA samples collected and analysed for a range of research and applied questions have accumulated in the laboratories of universities, government agencies and commercial service providers for decades. These DNA archives represent a valuable, yet largely un‐tapped repository of genomic information. With lowering costs of, and increasing access to, high‐throughput sequencing, we predict an increase in retrospective research to explore the wealth of information that resides in these archival samples. However, for this to occur, we need confidence in the integrity of the DNA samples, often stored under suboptimal conditions and their fitness of purpose for downstream genomic analysis. Here, we borrow from a well‐established concept in ancient DNA to evaluate sample integrity, defined as loss of information content in recovered amplicons, of frozen DNA samples and based on the ratio of ⍺‐diversity of short‐ and long‐read 16S rRNA gene sequences. The 16S rRNA variable region of 87 stored DNA samples, extracted from soil, collected from western and southern agricultural regions of Australia between 2001 and 2021 were sequenced using both PacBio full length reads (V1–V9, 1.5 kbp) and Illumina short‐reads (V3–V4, 200–450 bp). When ⍺‐diversity ratios were calculated between the long and short reads to assess DNA degradation, the ratio of ⍺‐diversity did not decrease in older samples versus younger samples. We suggest this as a novel method to confirm integrity of DNA before embarking on large‐scale diversity profiling projects using archival DNA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: A British Ecological Society journal, Methods in Ecology and Evolution (MEE) promotes the development of new methods in ecology and evolution, and facilitates their dissemination and uptake by the research community. MEE brings together papers from previously disparate sub-disciplines to provide a single forum for tracking methodological developments in all areas. MEE publishes methodological papers in any area of ecology and evolution, including: -Phylogenetic analysis -Statistical methods -Conservation & management -Theoretical methods -Practical methods, including lab and field -This list is not exhaustive, and we welcome enquiries about possible submissions. Methods are defined in the widest terms and may be analytical, practical or conceptual. A primary aim of the journal is to maximise the uptake of techniques by the community. We recognise that a major stumbling block in the uptake and application of new methods is the accessibility of methods. For example, users may need computer code, example applications or demonstrations of methods.
期刊最新文献
sabinaNSDM: An R package for spatially nested hierarchical species distribution modelling Introducing a unique animal ID and digital life history museum for wildlife metadata tidysdm: Leveraging the flexibility of tidymodels for species distribution modelling in R Robust characterisation of forest structure from airborne laser scanning—A systematic assessment and sample workflow for ecologists Spatial confounding in joint species distribution models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1