范围综述:什么样的内置社交工具能让学生留在 MOOC 中?

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3
Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer
{"title":"范围综述:什么样的内置社交工具能让学生留在 MOOC 中?","authors":"Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number of Massive Open Online Courses’ (MOOCs) participants has been increasing over the years but its completion rate is extremely low. Social support/social interaction is one of the key factors that has a huge impact on students’ learning motivation in both online and offline environments, but difficult to maintain in MOOCs due to its asynchronicity. Built-in social tools are therefore important in the MOOCs learning context because they can provide opportunities for students to interact with both other students and instructors. Present scoping review focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs and aimed to find out: What theories have been utilised to guide or explain how built-in social tools in MOOCs might support students? What kind of built-in social tools have been applied in MOOCs? What kind of outcomes have been investigated in research that focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs? Seventy articles have been included in this review and we found that (1) the majority of the research did not use any theories or models to guide the study design or explain the findings (2) Forum is dominating in numbers compared to other built-in social tools (3) Most studies focused on observed data such as number and content of posts in the forum, and their relationships with course grade and completion rate. However, no research has focused on how built-in social tools might affect students’ belongingness, which is considered to have a significant influence on students’ motivation to learn. Suggestions to address the research gaps were given.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review: what kind of built-in social tools keep students in MOOCs?\",\"authors\":\"Juming Jiang, Luke K. Fryer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The number of Massive Open Online Courses’ (MOOCs) participants has been increasing over the years but its completion rate is extremely low. Social support/social interaction is one of the key factors that has a huge impact on students’ learning motivation in both online and offline environments, but difficult to maintain in MOOCs due to its asynchronicity. Built-in social tools are therefore important in the MOOCs learning context because they can provide opportunities for students to interact with both other students and instructors. Present scoping review focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs and aimed to find out: What theories have been utilised to guide or explain how built-in social tools in MOOCs might support students? What kind of built-in social tools have been applied in MOOCs? What kind of outcomes have been investigated in research that focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs? Seventy articles have been included in this review and we found that (1) the majority of the research did not use any theories or models to guide the study design or explain the findings (2) Forum is dominating in numbers compared to other built-in social tools (3) Most studies focused on observed data such as number and content of posts in the forum, and their relationships with course grade and completion rate. However, no research has focused on how built-in social tools might affect students’ belongingness, which is considered to have a significant influence on students’ motivation to learn. Suggestions to address the research gaps were given.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12987-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)的参与人数不断增加,但完成率却极低。无论是在线还是离线环境,社交支持/社交互动都是对学生学习动机产生巨大影响的关键因素之一,但在 MOOCs 中,由于其异步性,社交支持/社交互动很难维持。因此,内置社交工具在 MOOCs 学习环境中非常重要,因为它们可以为学生提供与其他学生和教师互动的机会。本次范围界定审查的重点是 MOOC 中的内置社交工具,旨在了解有哪些理论被用来指导或解释MOOC中的内置社交工具如何为学生提供支持?在 MOOC 中应用了哪些内置社交工具?以 MOOC 中的内置社交工具为重点的研究调查了哪些结果?我们发现:(1) 大多数研究没有使用任何理论或模型来指导研究设计或解释研究结果;(2) 与其他内置社交工具相比,论坛在数量上占优势;(3) 大多数研究侧重于观察数据,如论坛帖子的数量和内容,以及它们与课程成绩和完成率的关系。然而,没有研究关注内置社交工具如何影响学生的归属感,而归属感被认为对学生的学习动机有重要影响。针对这些研究空白提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A scoping review: what kind of built-in social tools keep students in MOOCs?

The number of Massive Open Online Courses’ (MOOCs) participants has been increasing over the years but its completion rate is extremely low. Social support/social interaction is one of the key factors that has a huge impact on students’ learning motivation in both online and offline environments, but difficult to maintain in MOOCs due to its asynchronicity. Built-in social tools are therefore important in the MOOCs learning context because they can provide opportunities for students to interact with both other students and instructors. Present scoping review focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs and aimed to find out: What theories have been utilised to guide or explain how built-in social tools in MOOCs might support students? What kind of built-in social tools have been applied in MOOCs? What kind of outcomes have been investigated in research that focused on built-in social tools in MOOCs? Seventy articles have been included in this review and we found that (1) the majority of the research did not use any theories or models to guide the study design or explain the findings (2) Forum is dominating in numbers compared to other built-in social tools (3) Most studies focused on observed data such as number and content of posts in the forum, and their relationships with course grade and completion rate. However, no research has focused on how built-in social tools might affect students’ belongingness, which is considered to have a significant influence on students’ motivation to learn. Suggestions to address the research gaps were given.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1