碳交易的市场失灵

Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu
{"title":"碳交易的市场失灵","authors":"Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu","doi":"arxiv-2408.06497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism\nthat internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces\npollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market,\nwe evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis\nof the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System\nin 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon\nemissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended\nconsequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of\nfirms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the\nsurrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are\nthe months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This\nsurrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about\nEuro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the\nregulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in\nspeculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private\ninformation. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8\nbillion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the\nsample period.","PeriodicalId":501372,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Failures of Carbon Trading\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.06497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism\\nthat internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces\\npollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market,\\nwe evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis\\nof the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System\\nin 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon\\nemissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended\\nconsequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of\\nfirms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the\\nsurrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are\\nthe months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This\\nsurrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about\\nEuro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the\\nregulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in\\nspeculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private\\ninformation. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8\\nbillion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the\\nsample period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经济学理论中,限额交易制度是一种基于市场的制度机制,它将经济活动对环境的影响内部化,并以最小的成本减少污染。鉴于碳交易是一个金融市场,我们使用金融和资产定价工具来评估其效率。我们对 2005-2020 年欧盟碳排放交易体系中的所有交易进行了分析,结果表明,这个著名的碳排放总量控制与交易体系效率极低,因为它产生了一系列意想不到的后果,极大地损害了其目的。首先,约 40% 的企业在特定年份从未进行过交易。其次,许多企业只在交税月份进行交易,而在这些月份,企业必须立即履约。我们还发现,在这些月份,排放配额的价格可以预测会很高。仅这种退保交易模式就给受监管企业造成了约 50 亿欧元的损失,约占样本期内受监管企业交易量的 2%。第三,一些经营者从事投机交易,通过利用市场私人信息获利。我们估计,这些经营者总共获利约 80 亿欧元,约占样本期内受监管公司交易量的 3.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Market Failures of Carbon Trading
In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism that internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces pollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market, we evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis of the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System in 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended consequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of firms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the surrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are the months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This surrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about Euro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in speculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private information. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8 billion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the sample period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Asymmetry Index: The View of Market Analysts Market Failures of Carbon Trading Hydrogen Development in China and the EU: A Recommended Tian Ji's Horse Racing Strategy Applying the Nash Bargaining Solution for a Reasonable Royalty II Auction theory and demography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1