{"title":"碳交易的市场失灵","authors":"Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu","doi":"arxiv-2408.06497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism\nthat internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces\npollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market,\nwe evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis\nof the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System\nin 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon\nemissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended\nconsequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of\nfirms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the\nsurrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are\nthe months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This\nsurrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about\nEuro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the\nregulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in\nspeculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private\ninformation. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8\nbillion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the\nsample period.","PeriodicalId":501372,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Failures of Carbon Trading\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Borri, Yukun Liu, Aleh Tsyvinski, Xi Wu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.06497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism\\nthat internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces\\npollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market,\\nwe evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis\\nof the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System\\nin 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon\\nemissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended\\nconsequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of\\nfirms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the\\nsurrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are\\nthe months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This\\nsurrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about\\nEuro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the\\nregulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in\\nspeculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private\\ninformation. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8\\nbillion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the\\nsample period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In economic theory, a cap-and-trade system is a market-based system mechanism
that internalizes the environmental impact of economic activity and reduces
pollution with minimal costs. Given that carbon trading is a financial market,
we evaluate its efficiency using finance and asset-pricing tools. Our analysis
of the universe of transactions in the European Union Emission Trading System
in 2005-2020 demonstrates that this prominent cap-and-trade system for carbon
emissions is dramatically inefficient because of a number of unintended
consequences that significantly undermine its purposes. First, about 40% of
firms never trade in a given year. Second, many firms only trade in the
surrendering months, when compliance is immediate. We also show that these are
the months where the price of emission allowances is predictably high. This
surrendering trading pattern alone leads to a total estimated loss of about
Euro 5 billion for the regulated firms, or about 2% of the traded volume of the
regulated firms in the sample period. Third, a number of operators engage in
speculative trading and profit by exploiting the market with private
information. We estimate that these operators in total make about Euro 8
billion, or about 3.5% of the traded volume of the regulated firms in the
sample period.