术前康复训练对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后虚弱的影响

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353
Fuyu Yang, Ye Yuan, Wenwen Liu, Chenglin Tang, Fan He, Defei Chen, Junjie Xiong, Guoquan Huang, Kun Qian
{"title":"术前康复训练对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后虚弱的影响","authors":"Fuyu Yang, Ye Yuan, Wenwen Liu, Chenglin Tang, Fan He, Defei Chen, Junjie Xiong, Guoquan Huang, Kun Qian","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundTo improve perioperative frailty status in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCCS), we explored a new intensive prehabilitation program that combines prehabilitation exercises with standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and explored its impact.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Between April 2021 to August 2021, patients undergoing elective LCCS were randomized into the standardized ERAS (S-ERAS) group or ERAS based on prehabilitation (group PR-ERAS). Patients in the PR-ERAS group undergoing prehabilitation exercises in the perioperative period in addition to standard enhanced recovery after surgery. We explored the effects of this prehabilitation protocol on frailty, short-term quality of recovery (QoR), psychological status, postoperative functional capacity, postoperative outcomes, and pain.ResultsIn total, 125 patients were evaluated, and 95 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to the S-ERAS (n = 45) and PR-ERAS (n = 50) groups. The Fried score was higher in the PR-ERAS group on postoperative day (7 (2(2,3) vs. 3(2,4), P = 0.012). The QoR-9 was higher in the PR-ERAS group than in the S-ERAS group on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. The PR-ERAS group had an earlier time to first ambulation (P &amp;lt; 0.050) and time to first flatus (P &amp;lt; 0.050).ConclusionPrehabilitation exercises can improve postoperative frailty and accelerate recovery in patients undergoing LCCS but may not improve surgical safety. Therefore, better and more targeted prehabilitation recovery protocols should be explored.Clinical trial registration<jats:ext-link>www.clinicaltrials.org</jats:ext-link>, identifier NCT04964856.","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of prehabilitation exercises on postoperative frailty in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery\",\"authors\":\"Fuyu Yang, Ye Yuan, Wenwen Liu, Chenglin Tang, Fan He, Defei Chen, Junjie Xiong, Guoquan Huang, Kun Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundTo improve perioperative frailty status in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCCS), we explored a new intensive prehabilitation program that combines prehabilitation exercises with standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and explored its impact.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Between April 2021 to August 2021, patients undergoing elective LCCS were randomized into the standardized ERAS (S-ERAS) group or ERAS based on prehabilitation (group PR-ERAS). Patients in the PR-ERAS group undergoing prehabilitation exercises in the perioperative period in addition to standard enhanced recovery after surgery. We explored the effects of this prehabilitation protocol on frailty, short-term quality of recovery (QoR), psychological status, postoperative functional capacity, postoperative outcomes, and pain.ResultsIn total, 125 patients were evaluated, and 95 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to the S-ERAS (n = 45) and PR-ERAS (n = 50) groups. The Fried score was higher in the PR-ERAS group on postoperative day (7 (2(2,3) vs. 3(2,4), P = 0.012). The QoR-9 was higher in the PR-ERAS group than in the S-ERAS group on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. The PR-ERAS group had an earlier time to first ambulation (P &amp;lt; 0.050) and time to first flatus (P &amp;lt; 0.050).ConclusionPrehabilitation exercises can improve postoperative frailty and accelerate recovery in patients undergoing LCCS but may not improve surgical safety. Therefore, better and more targeted prehabilitation recovery protocols should be explored.Clinical trial registration<jats:ext-link>www.clinicaltrials.org</jats:ext-link>, identifier NCT04964856.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为了改善腹腔镜结直肠癌手术(LCCS)患者围手术期的虚弱状态,我们探索了一种新的强化康复前计划,该计划将康复前锻炼与标准术后增强恢复(ERAS)相结合,并探讨了其影响。2021 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,接受择期 LCCS 手术的患者被随机分为标准化 ERAS(S-ERAS)组或基于术前康复的 ERAS(PR-ERAS 组)。PR-ERAS组的患者在围手术期除了接受标准的术后强化康复训练外,还接受了术前康复训练。我们探讨了这一预康复方案对虚弱程度、短期康复质量(QoR)、心理状态、术后功能能力、术后结果和疼痛的影响。结果共对 125 名患者进行了评估,95 名符合条件的患者被纳入并随机分配到 S-ERAS 组(n = 45)和 PR-ERAS 组(n = 50)。PR-ERAS 组术后第 7 天的 Fried 评分更高(2(2,3) vs. 3(2,4),P = 0.012)。术后第 1、2、3 和 7 天,PR-ERAS 组的 QoR-9 均高于 S-ERAS 组。结论康复训练可以改善 LCCS 患者的术后虚弱状况并加速其恢复,但可能无法提高手术安全性。因此,应该探索更好、更有针对性的术前康复方案。临床试验注册www.clinicaltrials.org,标识符为NCT04964856。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of prehabilitation exercises on postoperative frailty in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
BackgroundTo improve perioperative frailty status in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCCS), we explored a new intensive prehabilitation program that combines prehabilitation exercises with standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and explored its impact.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Between April 2021 to August 2021, patients undergoing elective LCCS were randomized into the standardized ERAS (S-ERAS) group or ERAS based on prehabilitation (group PR-ERAS). Patients in the PR-ERAS group undergoing prehabilitation exercises in the perioperative period in addition to standard enhanced recovery after surgery. We explored the effects of this prehabilitation protocol on frailty, short-term quality of recovery (QoR), psychological status, postoperative functional capacity, postoperative outcomes, and pain.ResultsIn total, 125 patients were evaluated, and 95 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to the S-ERAS (n = 45) and PR-ERAS (n = 50) groups. The Fried score was higher in the PR-ERAS group on postoperative day (7 (2(2,3) vs. 3(2,4), P = 0.012). The QoR-9 was higher in the PR-ERAS group than in the S-ERAS group on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. The PR-ERAS group had an earlier time to first ambulation (P &lt; 0.050) and time to first flatus (P &lt; 0.050).ConclusionPrehabilitation exercises can improve postoperative frailty and accelerate recovery in patients undergoing LCCS but may not improve surgical safety. Therefore, better and more targeted prehabilitation recovery protocols should be explored.Clinical trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.org, identifier NCT04964856.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
2-methoxyestradiol inhibits the malignant behavior of triple negative breast cancer cells by altering their miRNome Effect of prehabilitation exercises on postoperative frailty in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery Biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: update ABHD5 as a friend or an enemy in cancer biology? Clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes among Syrian patients with advanced breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1