塔木德》中的计划生育数学

Simon Blatt, Uta Freiberg, Vladimir Shikhman
{"title":"塔木德》中的计划生育数学","authors":"Simon Blatt, Uta Freiberg, Vladimir Shikhman","doi":"arxiv-2408.09387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the\nfamily planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain\nnumbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of\nBeit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai\nurges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average\nfamily sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show\nmore that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth\nodds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical\ntechniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and\nbrute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously\nmotivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematics of Family Planning in Talmud\",\"authors\":\"Simon Blatt, Uta Freiberg, Vladimir Shikhman\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.09387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the\\nfamily planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain\\nnumbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of\\nBeit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai\\nurges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average\\nfamily sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show\\nmore that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth\\nodds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical\\ntechniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and\\nbrute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously\\nmotivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在犹太教《塔木德经》承诺的激励下,我们考虑了家庭计划规则,这些规则要求一对夫妇在达到一定数量的男孩和女孩之前必须要孩子。例如,比特希勒尔(Beit Hillel)拉比学派认为必须有一个男孩和一个女孩,而比特沙迈(Beit Shammaiurges)则认为必须有两个男孩。令人惊讶的是,虽然两种情况下相应的平均家庭规模不同,但性别比例却保持不变。我们还证明,对于任何计划生育规则,性别比例都等于出生率。这一结果的证明采用了不同的数学方法,如归纳法原理、杜布可选停止定理和蛮力法。我们得出的结论是,尽管出于宗教动机的计划生育规则可能存在不对称性,但它们既没有歧视男孩,也没有歧视女孩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mathematics of Family Planning in Talmud
Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the family planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain numbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of Beit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai urges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average family sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show more that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth odds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical techniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and brute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously motivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Roger Godement et les fonctions de type positif Winning Lights Out with Fibonacci A Mathematical Model of The Effects of Strike On Nigerian Universities Generalized Carlos Scales Samgamagrāma Mādhava: An Updated Biography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1