{"title":"塔木德》中的计划生育数学","authors":"Simon Blatt, Uta Freiberg, Vladimir Shikhman","doi":"arxiv-2408.09387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the\nfamily planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain\nnumbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of\nBeit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai\nurges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average\nfamily sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show\nmore that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth\nodds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical\ntechniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and\nbrute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously\nmotivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematics of Family Planning in Talmud\",\"authors\":\"Simon Blatt, Uta Freiberg, Vladimir Shikhman\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.09387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the\\nfamily planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain\\nnumbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of\\nBeit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai\\nurges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average\\nfamily sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show\\nmore that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth\\nodds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical\\ntechniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and\\nbrute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously\\nmotivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Motivated by the commitments from the Talmud in Judaism, we consider the
family planning rules which require a couple to get children till certain
numbers of boys and girls are reached. For example, the rabbinical school of
Beit Hillel says that one boy and one girl are necessary, whereas Beit Shammai
urges for two boys. Surprisingly enough, although the corresponding average
family sizes differ in both cases, the gender ratios remain constant. We show
more that for any family planning rule the gender ratio is equal to the birth
odds. The proof of this result is given by using different mathematical
techniques, such as induction principle, Doob's optional-stopping theorem, and
brute-force. We conclude that, despite possible asymmetries in the religiously
motivated family planning rules, they discriminate neither boys nor girls.