{"title":"作为实践原则的持久性","authors":"Iulian D. Toader","doi":"arxiv-2408.08547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The\nargument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th\ncentury by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others.\nTypically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was\nunderstood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of\npractical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was\nused in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial\ncalculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering\nHahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as\na logically necessary principle.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Permanence as a Principle of Practice\",\"authors\":\"Iulian D. Toader\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.08547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The\\nargument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th\\ncentury by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others.\\nTypically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was\\nunderstood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of\\npractical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was\\nused in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial\\ncalculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering\\nHahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as\\na logically necessary principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The
argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th
century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others.
Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was
understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of
practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was
used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial
calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering
Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as
a logically necessary principle.