作为实践原则的持久性

Iulian D. Toader
{"title":"作为实践原则的持久性","authors":"Iulian D. Toader","doi":"arxiv-2408.08547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The\nargument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th\ncentury by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others.\nTypically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was\nunderstood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of\npractical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was\nused in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial\ncalculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering\nHahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as\na logically necessary principle.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Permanence as a Principle of Practice\",\"authors\":\"Iulian D. Toader\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.08547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The\\nargument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th\\ncentury by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others.\\nTypically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was\\nunderstood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of\\npractical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was\\nused in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial\\ncalculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering\\nHahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as\\na logically necessary principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.08547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了皮亚诺关于保留熟悉符号的论点。该论证加强了永久性原则,该原则在 19 世纪初由皮科克提出,后经汉克尔调整,并被其他许多人所采用。永久性原则通常被视为理论理性原则,但皮亚诺继马赫之后,反对舒伯特,将其理解为实践理性原则。本文探讨了这样理解的永恒性如何被用于证明布拉里-福尔蒂和马科隆戈的矢量微积分符号的合理性,以及如何被用于反对弗雷格的逻辑符号,最后还探讨了哈恩对皮亚诺论证的复兴,反对普林塞姆将永恒性解读为逻辑上必要的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Permanence as a Principle of Practice
The paper discusses Peano's argument for preserving familiar notations. The argument reinforces the principle of permanence, articulated in the early 19th century by Peacock, then adjusted by Hankel and adopted by many others. Typically regarded as a principle of theoretical rationality, permanence was understood by Peano, following Mach, and against Schubert, as a principle of practical rationality. The paper considers how permanence, thus understood, was used in justifying Burali-Forti and Marcolongo's notation for vectorial calculus, and in rejecting Frege's logical notation, and closes by considering Hahn's revival of Peano's argument against Pringsheim' reading of permanence as a logically necessary principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Roger Godement et les fonctions de type positif Winning Lights Out with Fibonacci A Mathematical Model of The Effects of Strike On Nigerian Universities Generalized Carlos Scales Samgamagrāma Mādhava: An Updated Biography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1