iCount:针对阴道拭子滞留问题的人因工程解决方案--早期创新报告

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Innovations Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248
Ahmed Nader Elgharably, Kiran Desai, Alan Michael Nevill, Aaron Vance, Jon Lester, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Andrew Forrester, Peter Ogrodnik, Jeffrey Faint, Tom Clutton-Brock, Aditi Desai
{"title":"iCount:针对阴道拭子滞留问题的人因工程解决方案--早期创新报告","authors":"Ahmed Nader Elgharably, Kiran Desai, Alan Michael Nevill, Aaron Vance, Jon Lester, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Andrew Forrester, Peter Ogrodnik, Jeffrey Faint, Tom Clutton-Brock, Aditi Desai","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"### WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS #### HOW MIGHT IT IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE IN THE FUTURE Although uncommon, unintentionally retained surgical items remain a persistent and poorly understood medical error with the potential to cause significant harm. They are termed patient safety ‘never events’ and are considered unacceptable and largely preventable.1 The most commonly retained surgical item is the surgical swab, also known as ‘sponge’ in the USA, with the highest rates of swab retention found in the maternity setting. The UK never events database identifies vaginal swabs (used during perineal trauma repair) as the source of the largest number of swab retention events.2 3 NHS England data identifies 338 separate incidents of vaginal swab retention between 2012 and 2022 with evidence of global under-reporting due to the significant reputational impacts of these incidents as well as the difficulty in diagnosis and identification of error.1 3–6 This long-standing problem, also called ‘Gossypiboma’, was first reported in 1884 by the American Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Dr Wilson. …","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Nader Elgharably, Kiran Desai, Alan Michael Nevill, Aaron Vance, Jon Lester, Emma Bonfiglio, Colin Rigby, Andrew Forrester, Peter Ogrodnik, Jeffrey Faint, Tom Clutton-Brock, Aditi Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"### WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS #### HOW MIGHT IT IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE IN THE FUTURE Although uncommon, unintentionally retained surgical items remain a persistent and poorly understood medical error with the potential to cause significant harm. They are termed patient safety ‘never events’ and are considered unacceptable and largely preventable.1 The most commonly retained surgical item is the surgical swab, also known as ‘sponge’ in the USA, with the highest rates of swab retention found in the maternity setting. The UK never events database identifies vaginal swabs (used during perineal trauma repair) as the source of the largest number of swab retention events.2 3 NHS England data identifies 338 separate incidents of vaginal swab retention between 2012 and 2022 with evidence of global under-reporting due to the significant reputational impacts of these incidents as well as the difficulty in diagnosis and identification of error.1 3–6 This long-standing problem, also called ‘Gossypiboma’, was first reported in 1884 by the American Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Dr Wilson. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":53454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

#### 新发现是什么 #### 这可能对未来的医疗保健产生怎样的影响?虽然意外滞留的手术物品并不常见,但仍是一种长期存在且鲜为人知的医疗差错,有可能造成重大伤害。1 最常见的滞留手术物品是手术棉签,在美国也被称为 "海绵",在产科环境中棉签滞留率最高。英国从未发生过的事件数据库显示,阴道拭子(会阴创伤修复时使用)是造成最多拭子滞留事件的原因。3 英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的数据显示,2012 年至 2022 年间共发生 338 起阴道拭子滞留事件,由于这些事件对声誉造成重大影响,且难以诊断和识别错误,因此有证据表明全球存在报告不足的情况。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report
### WHAT ARE THE NEW FINDINGS #### HOW MIGHT IT IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE IN THE FUTURE Although uncommon, unintentionally retained surgical items remain a persistent and poorly understood medical error with the potential to cause significant harm. They are termed patient safety ‘never events’ and are considered unacceptable and largely preventable.1 The most commonly retained surgical item is the surgical swab, also known as ‘sponge’ in the USA, with the highest rates of swab retention found in the maternity setting. The UK never events database identifies vaginal swabs (used during perineal trauma repair) as the source of the largest number of swab retention events.2 3 NHS England data identifies 338 separate incidents of vaginal swab retention between 2012 and 2022 with evidence of global under-reporting due to the significant reputational impacts of these incidents as well as the difficulty in diagnosis and identification of error.1 3–6 This long-standing problem, also called ‘Gossypiboma’, was first reported in 1884 by the American Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Dr Wilson. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Innovations
BMJ Innovations Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical analysis of delivering chest compressions in virtual reality simulation: preliminary insights into fidelity and validity of virtual reality as a means of delivering life support training iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report Spreading and scaling innovation and improvement: understanding why the differences matter Role of twinnings in scaling up innovative solutions across Europe Wings of Healing: regulatory landscape, case studies and the Indian prologue of drones in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1