微创外翻手术中不同螺钉固定方法的生物力学比较研究:有限元分析

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001
T L Lewis,H Mansur,G F Ferreira,M V P Filho,L R Battaglion,R Zambelli,R Ray,G A Nunes
{"title":"微创外翻手术中不同螺钉固定方法的生物力学比较研究:有限元分析","authors":"T L Lewis,H Mansur,G F Ferreira,M V P Filho,L R Battaglion,R Zambelli,R Ray,G A Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere are different screw configurations utilised for minimally invasive hallux valgus (HV) deformity despite limited biomechanical data assessing the stability and strength of each construct. We aimed to compare the strength of various screw configurations for minimally invasive HV surgery using finite element analysis (FEA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA FEA model was developed from a CT of a female with moderate HV deformity. Five screw configurations utilizing one or two bicortical or intramedullary screws were tested. Stress analysis considered osteotomy displacement, maximum and minimum principal stresses, and von Mises stress for both implants and bone for each screw configuration.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFixation with two screws (one bicortical and one intramedullary) demonstrated the lowest values for osteotomy displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and equivalent von Mises stress on the bone and screws in both loading conditions.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe optimal configuration when performing minimally invasive surgery for moderate HV is one bicortical and one intramedullary screw.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nLevel III.","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"4 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative biomechanical study of different screw fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: A finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"T L Lewis,H Mansur,G F Ferreira,M V P Filho,L R Battaglion,R Zambelli,R Ray,G A Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThere are different screw configurations utilised for minimally invasive hallux valgus (HV) deformity despite limited biomechanical data assessing the stability and strength of each construct. We aimed to compare the strength of various screw configurations for minimally invasive HV surgery using finite element analysis (FEA).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA FEA model was developed from a CT of a female with moderate HV deformity. Five screw configurations utilizing one or two bicortical or intramedullary screws were tested. Stress analysis considered osteotomy displacement, maximum and minimum principal stresses, and von Mises stress for both implants and bone for each screw configuration.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nFixation with two screws (one bicortical and one intramedullary) demonstrated the lowest values for osteotomy displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and equivalent von Mises stress on the bone and screws in both loading conditions.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe optimal configuration when performing minimally invasive surgery for moderate HV is one bicortical and one intramedullary screw.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nLevel III.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管评估每种结构稳定性和强度的生物力学数据有限,但用于微创外翻(HV)畸形的螺钉配置却各不相同。我们旨在使用有限元分析(FEA)比较微创 HV 手术中各种螺钉配置的强度。测试了使用一根或两根双皮质螺钉或髓内螺钉的五种螺钉配置。应力分析考虑了每种螺钉配置的截骨位移、最大和最小主应力以及植入物和骨的冯米斯应力。结果使用两根螺钉(一根双皮质螺钉和一根髓内螺钉)进行固定,在两种加载条件下,截骨位移、最小和最大总应力以及骨和螺钉的等效冯米斯应力的值都是最低的。结论在对中度 HV 进行微创手术时,最佳配置是一颗双皮质螺钉和一颗髓内螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative biomechanical study of different screw fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: A finite element analysis.
BACKGROUND There are different screw configurations utilised for minimally invasive hallux valgus (HV) deformity despite limited biomechanical data assessing the stability and strength of each construct. We aimed to compare the strength of various screw configurations for minimally invasive HV surgery using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS A FEA model was developed from a CT of a female with moderate HV deformity. Five screw configurations utilizing one or two bicortical or intramedullary screws were tested. Stress analysis considered osteotomy displacement, maximum and minimum principal stresses, and von Mises stress for both implants and bone for each screw configuration. RESULTS Fixation with two screws (one bicortical and one intramedullary) demonstrated the lowest values for osteotomy displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and equivalent von Mises stress on the bone and screws in both loading conditions. CONCLUSION The optimal configuration when performing minimally invasive surgery for moderate HV is one bicortical and one intramedullary screw. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Integrating weightbearing CT findings into evaluation of conventional radiographs in progressive collapsing foot deformity. Open and all-inside arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould for chronic lateral ankle instability: A comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curves. Impact of dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment and biomechanics of patients with insertional achilles tendinopathy; A weightbearing CT-based simulation study. A systematic review of outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with INBONE II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1