用于厌氧消化的纺织废物预处理:综述和技术可行性研究

IF 2.8 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1002/jctb.7728
Naveenrajah Tharmarajah, Kaveh Shahbaz, Saeid Baroutian
{"title":"用于厌氧消化的纺织废物预处理:综述和技术可行性研究","authors":"Naveenrajah Tharmarajah,&nbsp;Kaveh Shahbaz,&nbsp;Saeid Baroutian","doi":"10.1002/jctb.7728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing volume of textile waste in landfills and incineration poses severe environmental challenges. Waste valorisation of textile waste via anaerobic digestion (AD) is preferable, as it offers economic and environmental benefits, but it is hindered by textile complexity, necessitating effective pretreatment technologies to improve biogas production. This study aims to evaluate various pretreatment technologies for biogas production from textile fibres via AD. A weighted-scoring analysis (WSA) assessed pretreatment methods based on technical, economic, environmental and operational criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment emerged as the most technically effective method, scoring 140 owing to its substantial methane enhancement. Economically, shredding was the most viable option, scoring 125, as a consequence of low capital and O&amp;M cost. Environmentally, hydrothermal and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatments were top performers with 100 points owing to low environmental impact and positive heat reactions. In a case study conducted in the Auckland region, the potential environmental impact (PEI) obtained from hydrothermal and DES were 169 and 92 per year, respectively, resulting in minimal environmental impact. Operationally, ultrasonic and biological pretreatments scored highest owing to their ease of operation, and minimal health and safety requirements. Overall, hydrothermal pretreatment achieved the highest WSA score of 340, reflecting its balanced performance across all criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment is the most promising technology for enhancing biogas production from textile waste. Its technical efficiency, economic feasibility and environmental benefits regarding the WSA score make it suitable for upscaling and providing a viable solution for managing textile waste in the AD plant. © 2024 The Author(s). <i>Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).</p>","PeriodicalId":15335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology","volume":"99 11","pages":"2213-2227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jctb.7728","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textile waste pretreatment for anaerobic digestion: a review and technology feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Naveenrajah Tharmarajah,&nbsp;Kaveh Shahbaz,&nbsp;Saeid Baroutian\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jctb.7728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increasing volume of textile waste in landfills and incineration poses severe environmental challenges. Waste valorisation of textile waste via anaerobic digestion (AD) is preferable, as it offers economic and environmental benefits, but it is hindered by textile complexity, necessitating effective pretreatment technologies to improve biogas production. This study aims to evaluate various pretreatment technologies for biogas production from textile fibres via AD. A weighted-scoring analysis (WSA) assessed pretreatment methods based on technical, economic, environmental and operational criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment emerged as the most technically effective method, scoring 140 owing to its substantial methane enhancement. Economically, shredding was the most viable option, scoring 125, as a consequence of low capital and O&amp;M cost. Environmentally, hydrothermal and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatments were top performers with 100 points owing to low environmental impact and positive heat reactions. In a case study conducted in the Auckland region, the potential environmental impact (PEI) obtained from hydrothermal and DES were 169 and 92 per year, respectively, resulting in minimal environmental impact. Operationally, ultrasonic and biological pretreatments scored highest owing to their ease of operation, and minimal health and safety requirements. Overall, hydrothermal pretreatment achieved the highest WSA score of 340, reflecting its balanced performance across all criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment is the most promising technology for enhancing biogas production from textile waste. Its technical efficiency, economic feasibility and environmental benefits regarding the WSA score make it suitable for upscaling and providing a viable solution for managing textile waste in the AD plant. © 2024 The Author(s). <i>Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"99 11\",\"pages\":\"2213-2227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jctb.7728\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jctb.7728\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jctb.7728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

垃圾填埋和焚烧产生的纺织废物数量不断增加,给环境带来了严峻的挑战。通过厌氧消化(AD)对纺织废弃物进行废物价值化是可取的,因为它具有经济和环境效益,但它受到纺织品复杂性的阻碍,需要有效的预处理技术来提高沼气产量。本研究旨在评估通过 AD 从纺织纤维中生产沼气的各种预处理技术。加权评分分析法(WSA)根据技术、经济、环境和操作标准对预处理方法进行了评估。热水解预处理是技术上最有效的方法,得分 140 分,因为它能大量增加甲烷。在经济上,粉碎是最可行的选择,得分为 125 分,因为资本和运营及维护成本较低。在环境方面,水热法和深共晶溶剂(DES)预处理法因对环境影响小和热反应积极而表现最佳,得分为 100 分。在奥克兰地区进行的一项案例研究中,水热法和 DES 每年对环境的潜在影响(PEI)分别为 169 分和 92 分,对环境的影响极小。在操作方面,超声波预处理和生物预处理得分最高,因为它们易于操作,对健康和安全的要求最低。总体而言,热液预处理的 WSA 得分最高,为 340 分,反映了其在所有标准中的均衡表现。热液预处理是最有希望提高纺织废料沼气产量的技术。它的技术效率、经济可行性和 WSA 分数方面的环境效益使其适合升级,并为厌氧消化(AD)工厂管理纺织废物提供了可行的解决方案。作者:© 2024。化学技术和生物技术期刊》由约翰威利和桑斯有限公司代表化学工业学会(SCI)出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Textile waste pretreatment for anaerobic digestion: a review and technology feasibility study

The increasing volume of textile waste in landfills and incineration poses severe environmental challenges. Waste valorisation of textile waste via anaerobic digestion (AD) is preferable, as it offers economic and environmental benefits, but it is hindered by textile complexity, necessitating effective pretreatment technologies to improve biogas production. This study aims to evaluate various pretreatment technologies for biogas production from textile fibres via AD. A weighted-scoring analysis (WSA) assessed pretreatment methods based on technical, economic, environmental and operational criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment emerged as the most technically effective method, scoring 140 owing to its substantial methane enhancement. Economically, shredding was the most viable option, scoring 125, as a consequence of low capital and O&M cost. Environmentally, hydrothermal and deep eutectic solvent (DES) pretreatments were top performers with 100 points owing to low environmental impact and positive heat reactions. In a case study conducted in the Auckland region, the potential environmental impact (PEI) obtained from hydrothermal and DES were 169 and 92 per year, respectively, resulting in minimal environmental impact. Operationally, ultrasonic and biological pretreatments scored highest owing to their ease of operation, and minimal health and safety requirements. Overall, hydrothermal pretreatment achieved the highest WSA score of 340, reflecting its balanced performance across all criteria. Hydrothermal pretreatment is the most promising technology for enhancing biogas production from textile waste. Its technical efficiency, economic feasibility and environmental benefits regarding the WSA score make it suitable for upscaling and providing a viable solution for managing textile waste in the AD plant. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
268
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology(JCTB) is an international, inter-disciplinary peer-reviewed journal concerned with the application of scientific discoveries and advancements in chemical and biological technology that aim towards economically and environmentally sustainable industrial processes.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information In Focus: Materials and the Environment Symposium (XXXI IMRC México) Issue Information Adsorption behavior of graphite‐like walnut shell biochar modified with ammonia for ciprofloxacin in aqueous solution Eco‐friendly approaches for synthesis of indolyl 1H‐pyrroles using rice‐husk‐derived carbonaceous sulfonation as the green catalyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1